IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9806-d1786771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Enhancement of Landscape Resilience in Mountain–Water Towns from the Perspective of Cultural and Tourism Integration: Case Study of Yinji Town, Wugang City

Author

Listed:
  • Huaijing Wu

    (School of Human Settlements, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Shuo Liu

    (School of Human Settlements, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Hu Li

    (School of Human Settlements, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Wenqi Wang

    (School of Human Settlements, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Lijuan Niu

    (School of Human Settlements, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Hong Zhang

    (School of Human Settlements, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

Abstract

Rural tourism in China is advancing rapidly, with cultural and tourism integration (CTI) becoming a vital pathway for sustainability. Mountain–water towns, given their special geographical conditions, face numerous challenges in CTI development, which need to enhance landscape resilience. This study proposes the theoretical framework of landscape resilience in mountain–water towns from the perspective of CTI. Taking Yinji Town of Wugang City as an example, it constructs a resilience evaluation system including three dimensions: cultural landscape, natural landscape, and social systems. The study uses the AHP–Entropy Weight combined method to determine indicator weights. Indicator scores are obtained through field research and GIS analysis, which are substituted into the preparedness–vulnerability resilience model to calculate resilience level, and the Jenks Natural Breaks method is used for level classification. Finally, the Obstacle Degree Model is applied to identify the primary obstacle factors affecting landscape resilience. The results indicate the following: (1) The average landscape resilience (RI) score of the 19 villages in Yinji Town is 0.84 (RI < 1), indicating a generally low level. Two villages are in the high-level range, while four villages are in the low-level range. (2) Cultural landscape resilience is the primary weakness, with the lowest average score (0.70), while natural landscape resilience is the highest (1.03). (3) Major obstacles include such as the number of cultural inheritors, the degree of susceptibility to natural disasters, and the distance to core mountain–water resources. The study contributes a CTI-based evaluation framework and methodology for assessing landscape resilience, offering enhancement strategies through increased preparedness and reduced vulnerability.

Suggested Citation

  • Huaijing Wu & Shuo Liu & Hu Li & Wenqi Wang & Lijuan Niu & Hong Zhang, 2025. "Evaluation and Enhancement of Landscape Resilience in Mountain–Water Towns from the Perspective of Cultural and Tourism Integration: Case Study of Yinji Town, Wugang City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9806-:d:1786771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9806/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9806/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9806-:d:1786771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.