IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9793-d1786651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deepfake-Style AI Tutors in Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Review and Governance Framework for Sustainable Digital Education

Author

Listed:
  • Hanan Sharif

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Lahore Garrison University, Lahore 5400, Pakistan)

  • Amara Atif

    (School of Computer Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, Australia)

  • Arfan Ali Nagra

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Lahore Garrison University, Lahore 5400, Pakistan)

Abstract

Deepfake-style AI tutors are emerging in online education, offering personalized and multilingual instruction while introducing risks to integrity, privacy, and trust. This study aims to understand their pedagogical potential and governance needs for responsible integration. A PRISMA-guided, systematic review of 42 peer-reviewed studies (2015–early 2025) was conducted from 362 screened records, complemented by semi-structured questionnaires with 12 assistant professors (mean experience = 7 years). Thematic analysis using deductive codes achieved strong inter-coder reliability (κ = 0.81). Four major themes were identified: personalization and engagement, detection challenges and integrity risks, governance and policy gaps, and ethical and societal implications. The results indicate that while deepfake AI tutors enhance engagement, adaptability, and scalability, they also pose risks of impersonation, assessment fraud, and algorithmic bias. Current detection approaches based on pixel-level artifacts, frequency features, and physiological signals remain imperfect. To mitigate these challenges, a four-pillar governance framework is proposed, encompassing Transparency and Disclosure, Data Governance and Privacy, Integrity and Detection, and Ethical Oversight and Accountability, supported by a policy checklist, responsibility matrix, and risk-tier model. Deepfake AI tutors hold promise for expanding access to education, but fairness-aware detection, robust safeguards, and AI literacy initiatives are essential to sustain trust and ensure equitable adoption. These findings not only strengthen the ethical and governance foundations for generative AI in higher education but also contribute to the broader agenda of sustainable digital education. By promoting transparency, fairness, and equitable access, the proposed framework advances the long-term sustainability of learning ecosystems and aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) through responsible innovation and institutional resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanan Sharif & Amara Atif & Arfan Ali Nagra, 2025. "Deepfake-Style AI Tutors in Higher Education: A Mixed-Methods Review and Governance Framework for Sustainable Digital Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-27, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9793-:d:1786651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9793/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9793/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9793-:d:1786651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.