IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9744-d1784755.html

Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Changseog Oh

    (Department of Environmental Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), Goyang 10223, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyun Je Oh

    (Department of Environmental Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), Goyang 10223, Republic of Korea)

  • Seungjae Yeon

    (Department of Environmental Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), Goyang 10223, Republic of Korea)

  • Bokjin Lee

    (Department of Environmental Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), Goyang 10223, Republic of Korea)

  • Jusuk An

    (Department of Environmental Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), Goyang 10223, Republic of Korea
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study compares the operational performance of membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) and circulation-MCDI (C-MCDI) under symmetric (2/2, 3/3, 4/4 min) and asymmetric (5/2, 5/3, 5/4 min) adsorption/desorption cycles to identify efficient operating conditions at the pilot scale. A pilot system was tested with a NaCl solution of about 1000 mg/L, and 15 consecutive cycles were conducted to evaluate removal efficiency, specific energy consumption (SEC), and stability. MCDI consistently achieved over 90% removal efficiency with SEC below 0.6 kWh/m 3 across all modes, maintaining stable performance over 15 cycles. The 2/2 condition provided the shortest cycle time and the highest treated water productivity, making it the most efficient condition for the pilot-scale MCDI tested. C-MCDI showed stronger dependence on operating conditions, with the number of stable cycles ranging from 3 to 7 depending on desorption duration. Nevertheless, the 5/2 condition achieved about 91% removal efficiency with 0.58 kWh/m 3 SEC, and its extended adsorption period yielded about 2.5 times more treated water per cycle than the 2/2 case. Overall, this work provides a comparative pilot-scale evaluation of MCDI and C-MCDI, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and potential applications, and offering practical insights for energy-efficient and sustainable desalination strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Changseog Oh & Hyun Je Oh & Seungjae Yeon & Bokjin Lee & Jusuk An, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of MCDI and Circulation-MCDI Performance Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Cycle Modes at Pilot Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9744-:d:1784755
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9744-:d:1784755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.