IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9709-d1784164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Environmental Insights into Additive Manufacturing in Sand Casting and Investment Casting: Pathways to Net-Zero Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Alok Yadav

    (Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar 144008, India)

  • Rajiv Kumar Garg

    (Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar 144008, India)

  • Anish Sachdeva

    (Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology, Jalandhar 144008, India)

  • Karishma M. Qureshi

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Parul Institute of Technology, Parul University, Waghodia 391760, India)

  • Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Muhammad Musa Al-Qahtani

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

As manufacturing industries pursue net-zero emission (NZE) goals, hybrid manufacturing processes that integrate additive manufacturing (AM) with traditional casting techniques are gaining traction for their sustainability potential across the globe. Therefore, this work presents a “gate-to-gate” life cycle assessment (LCA) comparing AM-assisted sand casting (AM-SC) and AM-assisted investment casting (AM-IC), for Al-Si5-Cu3 alloy as a case material, under various energy scenarios including a conventional grid mix and renewable sources (wind, solar, hydro, and biomass). This study compares multiple environmental impact categories based on the CML 2001 methodology. The outcomes show that AM-SC consistently outperforms AM-IC in most impact categories. Under the grid mix scenario, AM-SC achieves 31.57% lower GWP, 19.28% lower AP, and 21.15% lower EP compared to AM-IC. AM-SC exhibits a 90.5% reduction in “Terrestrial Ecotoxicity Potential” and 75.73% in “Marine Ecotoxicity Potential”. Wind energy delivers the most significant emission reduction across both processes, reducing GWP by up to 98.3%, while AM-IC performs slightly better in HTP. These outcomes of the study offer site-specific empirical insights that support strategic decision-making for process selection and energy optimisation in casting. By quantifying environmental trade-offs aligned with India’s current energy mix and future renewable targets, the study provides a practical benchmark for tracking incremental gains toward the NZE goal. This work followed international standards (ISO 14040 and 14044), and the data were validated with both foundry records and field measurements; this study ensures reliable methods. The findings provide practical applications for making sustainable choices in the manufacturing process and show that the AM-assisted conventional manufacturing process is a promising route toward net-zero goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Alok Yadav & Rajiv Kumar Garg & Anish Sachdeva & Karishma M. Qureshi & Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi & Muhammad Musa Al-Qahtani, 2025. "Comparative Environmental Insights into Additive Manufacturing in Sand Casting and Investment Casting: Pathways to Net-Zero Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9709-:d:1784164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9709/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9709/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9709-:d:1784164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.