IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9680-d1783543.html

Calculation and Sustainability Evaluation of Grain Virtual Water Flow Among Provinces in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaodan Wu

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Le Zhao

    (Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Leqian Deng

    (School of Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK)

Abstract

Under the spatial distribution of water resources, with more water resources in the southern regions and less in the northern regions, and the “north–south grain transport” pattern, calculating the virtual water flow in food trade between provinces in China and analyzing its sustainability is crucial for ensuring the country’s water resources and food security. By considering various products and consumption types, the virtual water flow in inter-provincial grain trade is estimated using the Minimum Transport Cost Method and the Penman-Monteith formula. The sustainability of this virtual water flow is evaluated at the provincial level. (1) The results show that the top three provinces with the largest net virtual water outflow from inter-provincial grain trade are Heilongjiang, Henan, and Anhui, with net outflows of 43.166 billion m 3 , 18.974 billion m 3 , and 13.089 billion m 3 , respectively. The top three provinces with the largest net virtual water inflows are Hebei, Guangxi, and Liaoning, with net inflows of 18.875 billion m 3 , 10.076 billion m 3 , and 8.795 billion m 3 , respectively. (2) The largest inter-provincial virtual water flow occurs from Henan to Hebei (15.06 billion m 3 ), followed by Inner Mongolia to Hunan (9.57 billion m 3 ), and Heilongjiang to Hubei (9.04 billion m 3 ). (3) Overall, the current pattern of virtual water flow in China’s grain trade is sustainable, though several exporting provinces are under greater stress. In the actual scenario, the average water resource pressure index across all provinces is 0.43, 17.31% lower than the average of 0.52 in the scenario without inter-provincial grain trade. Compared with the scenario without inter-provincial grain product trade, in the actual scenario, Heilongjiang, Jilin, and Inner Mongolia show a higher increase in water resource pressure index, with increases of 94.74%, 73.68%, and 48%, respectively; Beijing, Shanghai, and Qinghai show a greater decrease in water resource pressure index, with reductions of 94.64%, 79.41%, and 66.67%, individually. And then, efforts should be made to adjust and optimize the structure of grain production and circulation; provinces with virtual water net outflow (such as Heilongjiang, Henan, Anhui, etc.) need to adjust their grain cultivation types and grain export structures.; provinces with virtual water net inflow (such as Hebei, Guangxi, Liaoning, etc.) can appropriately expand the scale of grain cultivation, while adjusting their diets to reduce the demand for water-intensive grains.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaodan Wu & Le Zhao & Leqian Deng, 2025. "Calculation and Sustainability Evaluation of Grain Virtual Water Flow Among Provinces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9680-:d:1783543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9680/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9680/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9680-:d:1783543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.