IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9648-d1783021.html

What Do We Focus on? Investigating Chinese Public Preferences for CSR Initiatives in Professional Sports Clubs

Author

Listed:
  • Chenxu Wang

    (College of P.E. and Sport, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100080, China)

  • Jiatong Song

    (College of P.E. and Sport, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100080, China)

  • Zhiwen Wang

    (College of P.E. and Sport, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100080, China)

Abstract

Purpose : This study examines the Chinese public’s preferences for corporate social responsibility (CSR) measures implemented by professional sports clubs, with a focus on identifying priority dimensions and heterogeneity across demographic groups. Approach : A choice-based conjoint analysis was conducted with 1043 residents across 22 Chinese cities hosting professional basketball or football clubs. Participants evaluated hypothetical CSR scenarios comprising six dimensions and 20 attribute levels. Cluster analysis was employed to analyze preference heterogeneity. Findings : Labor rights protection emerged as the most influential CSR dimension, ac-counting for 28.64% of the total importance. Subsequent dimensions, including Product/Service Quality (19.51%), Fair Sportsmanship (17.01%), Sports Development (14.07%), Economic Impact (12.73%), and Community Engagement (8.05%), also exerted substantial influence. Cluster analysis revealed five distinct preference segments: Labor Rights Prioritizers (24.5%), Performance-Driven Advocates (20.6%), Ethics-Focused Supporters (24.8%), Community-Embedded Participants (16.0%), and Economy-Boost Enthusiasts (15.1%). Notably, negative CSR practices (e.g., wage delays, match-fixing) significantly diminished public support, while proactive measures (e.g., employee development, community programs) enhanced preferences. Innovation : This study makes three incremental contributions compared with existing literature. First, it integrates both positive and negative CSR practices into a unified framework, whereas most prior studies examine only positive practices. Second, it expands CSR research beyond fan groups to include the broader public, thus enriching stakeholder theory applications in sports. Third, it adds empirical insights from developing countries to the academic community, thereby contextualizing CSR preferences within China’s unique institutional and cultural environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Chenxu Wang & Jiatong Song & Zhiwen Wang, 2025. "What Do We Focus on? Investigating Chinese Public Preferences for CSR Initiatives in Professional Sports Clubs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9648-:d:1783021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9648-:d:1783021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.