Climate Emotions and Readiness to Change: Evidences from Generalized Additive Models

The growing negative consequences of climate change support the need to deepen and investigate factors that may sustain the engagement of pro-environmental behaviors. In this scenario, eco-emotions represent a key factor that can potentially shape sustainable behaviors. In keeping with this, the present study aimed at observing the potential relationships between eco-emotions and readiness to change (RTC), namely a psychological construct closely related to pro-environmental behaviors. Specifically the RTC dimensions were the following: perceived importance of the problem, motivation, self-efficacy, effectiveness of the proposed solution, social support, action, and perceived readiness. In detail, Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) were performed in order to detect both linear and non-linear associations between eco-emotions and the dimensions of RTC by assuming a complex perspective. The final sample was composed of 252 participants (mean age = 32.99, SD = 14.640). The results pointed out several significant associations (both linear and non-linear) between eco-emotions and the RTC dimensions. In detail, the perceived importance of the problem was linearly associated with anger and anxiety, while sorrow and enthusiasm showed non-linear effects. Furthermore, motivation was linearly linked to anger and guilt and non-linearly to contempt, enthusiasm, and sorrow. In terms of self-efficacy, anger, enthusiasm, and sorrow showed linear relationships, whereas isolation showed a non-linear association. Perceived effectiveness of the proposed solution was linearly related to enthusiasm and sorrow and non-linearly to anger, powerlessness, isolation, and anxiety. Similarly, social support was linearly connected with enthusiasm, isolation, and sorrow, and non-linearly with powerlessness and anxiety. Moreover, action was primarily driven by anger in a linear relationship, while enthusiasm, powerlessness, guilt, and anxiety showed non-linear associations. Finally, perceived readiness was linearly related to anxiety and non-linearly to anger, contempt, enthusiasm, powerlessness, guilt, and sorrow. These findings should be interpreted in light of the study’s limitations, including its cross-sectional nature, reliance on self-reported measures, use of snowball sampling, and sample demographic characteristics, all of which may affect the generalizability of the results. Nevertheless, the results pointed out the presence of several significant linear (e.g., anxiety and the perceived importance of the problem) and non-linear (e.g., contempt and motivation) associations between various eco-emotions and RTC factors. The findings underscore the need for a complex approach to this field of research, suggesting that further studies, policies, and environmental awareness programs should consider the multifaceted nature of these phenomena in order to develop effective and valuable interventions.