IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9617-d1782256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Maize Forage Production: Effect of Organic Amendments Combined with Microbial Biofertilizers Across Different Soil Textures

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Serrapica

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Ida Di Mola

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Eugenio Cozzolino

    (Research Center for Cereal and Industrial Crops, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), 81100 Caserta, Italy)

  • Lucia Ottaiano

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Fiorella Sarubbi

    (Institute for the Animal Production System in the Mediterranean Environment, National Research Council, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Giannicola Pezzullo

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Antonio Di Francia

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Mauro Mori

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Felicia Masucci

    (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80055 Portici, Italy)

Abstract

This study aimed to assess whether the fertilizing effects of compost (Com) and vermicompost (VCom) applied to a preceding wheat crop, either alone or in combination with microbial biofertilizers (MBF; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacteria), could sustain forage maize yield across contrasting soil textures. A split–split plot trial was conducted in 2023 in sandy, loamy, and clay soils. Treatments included Com, VCom, standard mineral nitrogen fertilization, and unfertilized control, each tested with or without MBF inoculation. Maize was harvested at the milk–dough stage and assessed for biomass yield, dry matter partitioning, chemical composition, and in vitro digestibility. Interactions among factors were frequent, particularly with soil texture, but overall, Com and VCom sustained biomass yield and forage quality, especially when combined with MBF. Notably, in loamy soil, VCom coupled with MBF (38.4 t ha −1 ) outperformed mineral fertilization (32.9 t ha −1 ). Across soils, loam produced the highest dry matter yield (27.0 t ha −1 ) and sand the lowest (23.7 t ha −1 ), while clay showed variable responses depending on the amendment–MBFs combination. All plots treated with the MBFconsistently exhibited higher yields compared to their respective controls, with an average increase of 52.6% across texture and fertilization strategies. Fertilization strategy and soil texture slightly yet significantly affected maize chemical composition, while digestibility remained largely preserved. Crude protein concentration peaked under mineral fertilization in loamy soil (8.3% dry matter). These findings highlight the potential of bio-based fertilizers, especially when integrated with microbial inoculants, to reduce mineral nitrogen dependency and support the sustainable intensification of forage maize.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Serrapica & Ida Di Mola & Eugenio Cozzolino & Lucia Ottaiano & Fiorella Sarubbi & Giannicola Pezzullo & Antonio Di Francia & Mauro Mori & Felicia Masucci, 2025. "Sustainable Maize Forage Production: Effect of Organic Amendments Combined with Microbial Biofertilizers Across Different Soil Textures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9617-:d:1782256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9617/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9617/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9617-:d:1782256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.