IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9574-d1781252.html

Life Cycle Assessment of Adjustable Permanent Magnet Drives for a Low-Carbon Transition in China’s Coal-Fired Power Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Yutang Zeng

    (State Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China)

  • Jingjin Pan

    (China Electronics Standardization Institute, Beijing 100007, China)

  • Meng Gao

    (CSG Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510700, China)

  • Dong Liang

    (International Copper Association Asia, Beijing 100020, China)

  • Ran Zhuo

    (CSG Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510700, China)

  • Chuanbin Zhou

    (State Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China)

  • Bin Lu

    (State Key Laboratory of Regional and Urban Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China)

Abstract

The industrial motor systems account for 45% of global electricity consumption. A life cycle model is established to quantify the potential environmental benefits of typical adjustable permanent magnet drives (APMDs, 1250 kW) versus variable frequency drives (VFDs) in China. The model covers mining of metals, manufacturing, operation, and recycling phases of APMDs, incorporating empirical data from China’s 3232 coal-fired units. Four scenarios are set up: business-as-usual, moderate, aggressive, and full-retrofit. Key findings demonstrate that APMDs reduce operational energy consumption by 94.5% compared to VFDs through significantly declining frequency conversion losses and cooling requirements. The life cycle carbon emissions of APMDs (29.7 tonnes CO 2 _eq) represent merely 5% of VFDs emissions (570 tonnes CO 2 _eq), achieving a 95% reduction. Within APMDs’ footprint, recycling contributes a 45% emission offset (−13.3 tonnes CO 2 -eq), while operational efficiency drives the majority of the reduction. Sensitivity analysis identifies electricity emission factors, NdFeB production emissions, and metal recycling rates as primary sensitivity drivers (sensitivity index ST = 0.80). Scenario simulations confirm that the aggressive retrofit strategy (covering high- and moderate-potential units) could reduce annual GHG emissions of 3.12 million tonnes CO 2 _eq., with corresponding 89% decreases in particulate matter (PM). This research demonstrates that APMDs are an effective pathway for the low-carbon transition in coal power systems. Their large-scale implementation can potentially necessitate breakthroughs in tiered retrofit policies, thereby providing crucial technological support for industrial carbon neutrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Yutang Zeng & Jingjin Pan & Meng Gao & Dong Liang & Ran Zhuo & Chuanbin Zhou & Bin Lu, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment of Adjustable Permanent Magnet Drives for a Low-Carbon Transition in China’s Coal-Fired Power Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9574-:d:1781252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9574/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9574/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9574-:d:1781252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.