IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9549-d1780688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability in Eco-Concrete with Seashell Waste: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Karina D. Véliz

    (Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Diego Portales, Ejército Libertador Av. 441, Santiago 8370191, Chile)

  • Elizabeth Wagemann

    (Facultad de Arquitectura, Arte y Diseño, Universidad Diego Portales, República Av. 180, Santiago 8370074, Chile)

  • Lorena Espinoza

    (Facultad de Arquitectura, Arte y Diseño, Universidad Diego Portales, República Av. 180, Santiago 8370074, Chile)

  • Alejandro Prieto

    (Facultad de Arquitectura, Arte y Diseño, Universidad Diego Portales, República Av. 180, Santiago 8370074, Chile)

  • Nicolás Cabargas

    (Facultad de Arquitectura, Arte y Diseño, Universidad Diego Portales, República Av. 180, Santiago 8370074, Chile)

  • Leonardo Brescia-Norambuena

    (Departamento de Ingeniería en Obras Civiles, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Victor Jara Av. 3659, Santiago 9170124, Chile)

  • Claudio Fredes

    (Facultad de Arquitectura, Arte y Diseño, Universidad Diego Portales, República Av. 180, Santiago 8370074, Chile)

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic literature review of articles that include a life cycle assessment and sustainability assessment to measure the potential impacts of seashell waste usage in concrete production, the geographical context, and existing knowledge gaps. Concrete’s extensive production has significant environmental impacts due to resource depletion and ecosystem threats. Sustainable alternatives, like seashell waste, are explored, with life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis aiding in evaluating their environmental performance and promoting circular economy principles. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive review of eco-concrete with seashell waste was conducted. Search strategies were refined to include related terms, and rigorous screening processes were employed for article selection and data extraction. A literature search yielded 66 articles on seashell waste in concrete, with 33 selected for review through initial and secondary screenings of studies. Studies primarily focused on seashells as an aggregate or cement substitute. Findings indicate that seashell waste as a construction material has been studied to a limited extent, with few studies utilizing life cycle assessment tools. However, some existing quantitative and qualitative sustainability analyses suggest seashell waste could be a promising and sustainable option for construction materials. Geographically, Spain leads in research, with China and Iran also prominent. Furthermore, we conducted a content analysis using Leximancer software to identify and evaluate concept maps through current research domains and emerging trends. Life cycle assessment, environment, and sustainability are common themes among the articles studied. This review also identifies limitations in bias, article heterogeneity, and search scope. Opportunities exist for a circular economy approach in cement production using seashell waste, but future research should explore its economic, environmental, and social impacts. Recommendations include expanding life cycle assessment studies, improving sustainability analyses, and using tools like the Integrated value model for sustainable evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Karina D. Véliz & Elizabeth Wagemann & Lorena Espinoza & Alejandro Prieto & Nicolás Cabargas & Leonardo Brescia-Norambuena & Claudio Fredes, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainability in Eco-Concrete with Seashell Waste: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-30, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9549-:d:1780688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9549-:d:1780688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.