Author
Listed:
- Mengyu Qu
(School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing 100083, China)
- Likun Cai
(School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing 100083, China)
- Jinrong Li
(Pastoral Water Conservancy Science Research Institute, The Ministry of Water Resources, Hohhot 010020, China
Eco–Environmental Change and Integrated Management Field Observation and Research Station of Inner Mongolia, Yellow River Great Bend Region, Bayannur 015000, China)
- Guodong Ding
(School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing 100083, China)
- Xiaoping Guo
(School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing 100083, China)
Abstract
Wind and sand disaster prevention is a critical challenge for global environmental sustainability, with mechanical wind fences being key engineering measures. Current fences, including solid and permeable types, often struggle to balance environmental impact, windbreak efficiency, and stability. Solid fences provide effective sand control but have limited windbreak efficiency, while permeable fences improve airflow but require deep burial and are prone to erosion on uneven terrain. This study proposes a novel composite wind fence with a polylactic acid (PLA) sandbag base and a fiber mesh top, combining stability and permeability. We assessed windbreak performance using computational fluid dynamics simulations and verified results through wind tunnel experiments. Results show that the novel composite wind fence enhances windbreak efficiency and stability by optimizing airflow distribution, with the PLA sandbag base suppressing high–speed airflow and mesh fence weakening of leeward side vortices. Under wind speeds of 10 m/s, 18 m/s, and 28 m/s, the effective protection distance of the novel composite wind fence improved by 22.33% to 36.51%, 10.96% to 34.22%, and 0.94% to 28.98%, respectively, compared to single PLA and mesh wind fence. The optimal row spacing for the novel wind fences in three rows is 12 h when the incoming wind speed is 10 m/s, while the recommended spacings are 8 h and 6 h for wind speeds of 18 m/s and 28 m/s, respectively, ensuring continuous and effective protection. These findings present a novel wind fence technology with improved wind resistance, a more stable structure, and prolonged protective effects, offering an effective solution for environmental conservation initiatives aimed at preventing wind and sand disasters while promoting the sustainability of ecosystems.
Suggested Citation
Mengyu Qu & Likun Cai & Jinrong Li & Guodong Ding & Xiaoping Guo, 2025.
"Innovative Design of PLA Sandbag–Fiber Mesh Composite Wind Fences and Synergistic Windbreak Performance,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9418-:d:1777944
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Mahamat Nour Issa Abdallah & Tan Qulin & Mohamed Ramadan & Providence Habumuremyi, 2025.
"Mitigation Measures for Wind Erosion and Sand Deposition in Desert Railways: A Geospatial Analysis of Sand Accumulation Risk,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, April.
- Fang Wang & Shixiao Liu & Yujia Jiang & Weijia Duan, 2023.
"Research on the Effect of Sand Barriers on Highways in Desert Areas on Sand Control,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-13, September.
- Jiahao Li & Ming Cui & Qi Cai & Yuguo Liu & Wenjing Bo, 2024.
"Spatiotemporal Patterns and Drivers of Trade-Offs and Synergy in the Beijing–Tianjin Sand Source Control Project: A Bayesian Belief Network-Based Analysis,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9418-:d:1777944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.