IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9216-d1773700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Equity and Perceived Learning Effect in Dual-Teacher Classroom Under Education for Sustainable Development: A Comparative Study of Student Engagement Mechanisms Through the Opportunity-to-Learn Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Guangwei Hu

    (Elementary Education College, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Yonghai Zhu

    (AI Education Institute, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Di Liu

    (Elementary Education College, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Ziling Liu

    (Elementary Education College, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

Ensuring equitable access to quality education is essential for Education for Sustainable Development. However, the efficacy of innovative Education for Sustainable Development models like the Dual-Teacher Classroom in promoting teaching equity has not been sufficiently studied. Grounded in the Opportunity to Learn (OTL) theory—a theoretical framework that provides observational constructs for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), which are operationalized as empirical measures in this study—this study investigates the mechanisms through which teaching equity influences perceived learning effect, with learning engagement as a mediator, among elementary students in Beijing, China. Data were collected from 278 participants using a validated questionnaire. The results reveal significant disparities between urban and rural students, with urban students demonstrating higher levels of teaching equity, learning engagement, and perceived learning effect. Mediation analysis indicated that learning engagement acts as a partial mediator for urban students, whereas it serves as a full mediator for rural students. These findings highlight the importance of context-sensitive instructional strategies to enhance equity and engagement in the Dual-Teacher Classroom. The study contributes to the discourse on educational sustainability by emphasizing the role of equitable teaching practices in fostering inclusive and effective learning environments. Practical implications for teacher collaboration and real-time feedback mechanisms are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangwei Hu & Yonghai Zhu & Di Liu & Ziling Liu, 2025. "Teaching Equity and Perceived Learning Effect in Dual-Teacher Classroom Under Education for Sustainable Development: A Comparative Study of Student Engagement Mechanisms Through the Opportunity-to-Lea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9216-:d:1773700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerald Fry, 1983. "Empirical indicators of educational equity and equality: A thai case study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 199-215, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentino Larcinese, 2008. "A Discrepancy Index for the Study of Participation with an Application to the Case of Higher Education in Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 88(3), pages 483-496, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9216-:d:1773700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.