IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9196-d1773205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Stakeholder Agile Governance Mechanism of AI Based on Credit Entropy

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Cheng

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
    China Mobile Communications Corporation, Beijing 100033, China)

  • Wenjing Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China)

  • Ruoyu Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China)

  • Chen Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China)

Abstract

Driven by the rapid evolution of AI technology, compatible management mechanisms have become a systematic project involving the participation of multiple stakeholders. However, constrained by the rigidity and lag of traditional laws, the “one-size-fits-all” regulatory model will exacerbate the vulnerability of the complex system of AI governance, hinder the sustainable evolution of the AI ecosystem that relies on the dynamic balance between innovation and responsibility, and ultimately fall into the dilemma of “chaos when laissez-faire, stagnation when over-regulated”. To address this challenge, this study takes the multi-stakeholder collaborative mechanism co-established by governments, enterprises, and third-party technical audit institutions as its research object and centers on the issue of “strategic fluctuations” caused by key factor disturbances. From the perspective of the full life cycle of technological development, the study integrates the historical compliance performance of stakeholders and develops a nonlinear dynamic reward and punishment mechanism based on Credit Entropy. Through evolutionary game simulation, it further examines this mechanism as a realization path to promote the transformation from passive campaign-style AI supervision to agile governance of AI, which is characterized by rapid response and minimal intervention, thereby laying a foundation for the sustainable development of AI technology that aligns with long-term social well-being, resource efficiency, and inclusive growth. Finally, the study puts forward specific governance suggestions, such as setting access thresholds for third-party institutions and strengthening their independence and professionalism, to ensure that the iterative development of AI makes positive contributions to the sustainability of socio-technical systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Cheng & Wenjing Chen & Ruoyu Li & Chen Zhang, 2025. "Multi-Stakeholder Agile Governance Mechanism of AI Based on Credit Entropy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9196-:d:1773205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9196-:d:1773205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.