IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9011-d1768908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

30-Year Dynamics of Vegetation Loss in China’s Surface Coal Mines: A Comparative Evaluation of CCDC and LandTrendr Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Wanxi Liu

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    China Coal Green Energy Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing 100032, China)

  • Yaling Xu

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Huizhen Xie

    (Satellite Application Center for Ecology and Environment, MEE, Beijing 100094, China)

  • Han Zhang

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Li Guo

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jun Li

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Chengye Zhang

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Large-scale vegetation loss induced by surface coal mining constitutes a critical driver of regional ecological degradation. However, the applicability of existing change detection methodologies based on remote sensing within complex mining areas under diverse climatic conditions remains systematically unverified. To address this gap and reveal nationwide disturbance patterns, this study systematically evaluates the performance of two algorithms—Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) and Landsat-based Detection of Trends in Disturbance and Recovery (LandTrendr)—in identifying vegetation loss across three major climatic zones of China (the humid, semi-humid, and semi-arid zones). Based on the optimal algorithm, the vegetation loss year and loss magnitude across all of China’s surface coal mining areas from 1990 to 2020 were accurately identified, enabling the reconstruction of the comprehensive, nationwide spatio-temporal pattern of mining-induced vegetation loss over the past 30 years. The results show that: (1) CCDC demonstrated superior stability and significantly higher accuracy (OA = 0.82) than LandTrendr (OA = 0.31) in identifying loss years across all zones. (2) The cumulative vegetation loss area reached 1429.68 km 2 , with semi-arid zones accounting for 86.76%. Temporal analysis revealed a continuous expansion of the loss area from 2003 to 2013, followed by a distinct inflection point and decline during 2014–2016 attributable to policy-driven regulations. (3) Further analysis revealed significant variations in the average magnitude of loss across different climatic zones, namely semi-arid (0.11), semi-humid (0.21), and humid (0.25). These findings underscore the imperative for region-specific restoration strategies to ensure effective conservation outcomes. This study provides a systematic quantification and analysis of long-term, nationwide evolution patterns and regional differentiation characteristics of vegetation loss induced by surface coal mining in China, offering critical support for sustainable development decision-making in balancing energy development and ecological conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanxi Liu & Yaling Xu & Huizhen Xie & Han Zhang & Li Guo & Jun Li & Chengye Zhang, 2025. "30-Year Dynamics of Vegetation Loss in China’s Surface Coal Mines: A Comparative Evaluation of CCDC and LandTrendr Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9011-:d:1768908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9011/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9011/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9011-:d:1768908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.