IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9009-d1768922.html

Optimizing Spatial Scales for Evaluating High-Resolution CO 2 Fossil Fuel Emissions: Multi-Source Data and Machine Learning Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yujun Fang

    (Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Rong Li

    (Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Jun Cao

    (School of Architecture and Engineering, Wuhan City Polytechnic, Wuhan 430064, China)

Abstract

High-resolution CO 2 fossil fuel emission data are critical for developing targeted mitigation policies. As a key approach for estimating spatial distributions of CO 2 emissions, top–down methods typically rely upon spatial proxies to disaggregate administrative-level emission to finer spatial scales. However, conventional linear regression models may fail to capture complex non-linear relationships between proxies and emissions. Furthermore, methods relying on nighttime light data are mostly inadequate in representing emissions for both industrial and rural zones. To address these limitations, this study developed a multiple proxy framework integrating nighttime light, points of interest (POIs), population, road networks, and impervious surface area data. Seven machine learning algorithms—Extra-Trees, Random Forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, Gradient Boosting Decision Trees, LightGBM, and Support Vector Regression—were comprehensively incorporated to estimate high-resolution CO 2 fossil fuel emissions. Comprehensive evaluation revealed that the multiple proxy Extra-Trees model significantly outperformed the single-proxy nighttime light linear regression model at the county scale, achieving R 2 = 0.96 (RMSE = 0.52 MtCO 2 ) in cross-validation and R 2 = 0.92 (RMSE = 0.54 MtCO 2 ) on the independent test set. Feature importance analysis identified brightness of nighttime light (40.70%) and heavy industrial density (21.11%) as the most critical spatial proxies. The proposed approach also showed strong spatial consistency with the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China, exhibiting correlation coefficients of 0.82–0.84. This study demonstrates that integrating local multiple proxy data with machine learning corrects spatial biases inherent in traditional top–down approaches, establishing a transferable framework for high-resolution emissions mapping.

Suggested Citation

  • Yujun Fang & Rong Li & Jun Cao, 2025. "Optimizing Spatial Scales for Evaluating High-Resolution CO 2 Fossil Fuel Emissions: Multi-Source Data and Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9009-:d:1768922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9009/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9009/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Detlef P. van Vuuren & Steve J. Smith & Keywan Riahi, 2010. "Downscaling socioeconomic and emissions scenarios for global environmental change research: a review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(3), pages 393-404, May.
    2. Cai, Bofeng & Zhang, Lixiao, 2014. "Urban CO2 emissions in China: Spatial boundary and performance comparison," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 557-567.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen Li & Heng Li & Xionghe Qin, 2022. "Spatial Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions and Its Influencing Factors in China: Evidence from 286 Prefecture-Level Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Waldemar BOJAR & Leszek KNOPIK & Jacek ŻARSKI & Renata KUŚMIEREK-TOMASZEWSKA, 2015. "Integrated assessment of crop productivity based on the food supply forecasting," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(11), pages 502-510.
    3. Cai, Bofeng & Liu, Helin & Zhang, Xiaoling & Pan, Haozhi & Zhao, Mengxue & Zheng, Tianming & Nie, Jingxin & Du, Mengbing & Dhakal, Shobhakar, 2022. "High-resolution accounting of urban emissions in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    4. Chen, Qianli & Cai, Bofeng & Dhakal, Shobhakar & Pei, Sha & Liu, Chunlan & Shi, Xiaoping & Hu, Fangfang, 2017. "CO2 emission data for Chinese cities," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 198-208.
    5. Xuecheng Wang & Xu Tang & Zhenhua Feng & Yi Zhang, 2019. "Characterizing the Embodied Carbon Emissions Flows and Ecological Relationships among Four Chinese Megacities and Other Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Wei Shi & Zhiquan Sha & Fuwei Qiao & Wenwen Tang & Chuyu Luo & Yali Zheng & Chunli Wang & Jun Ge, 2023. "Study on the Temporal and Spatial Evolution of China’s Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Its Emission Reduction Path," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Wang, Saige & Chen, Bin, 2018. "Three-Tier carbon accounting model for cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 163-175.
    8. Jiansheng Qu & Tek Maraseni & Lina Liu & Zhiqiang Zhang & Talal Yusaf, 2015. "A Comparison of Household Carbon Emission Patterns of Urban and Rural China over the 17 Year Period (1995–2011)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Shi, Kaifang & Chen, Yun & Li, Linyi & Huang, Chang, 2018. "Spatiotemporal variations of urban CO2 emissions in China: A multiscale perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 218-229.
    10. Hui Wang & Guifen Liu & Kaifang Shi, 2019. "What Are the Driving Forces of Urban CO 2 Emissions in China? A Refined Scale Analysis between National and Urban Agglomeration Levels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Cai, Bofeng & Guo, Huanxiu & Ma, Zipeng & Wang, Zhixuan & Dhakal, Shobhakar & Cao, Libin, 2019. "Benchmarking carbon emissions efficiency in Chinese cities: A comparative study based on high-resolution gridded data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 994-1009.
    12. Xiaofeng Lv & Kun Lin & Lingshan Chen & Yongzhong Zhang, 2022. "Does Retirement Affect Household Energy Consumption Structure? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Sferra, Fabio & Krapp, Mario & Roming, Niklas & Schaeffer, Michiel & Malik, Aman & Hare, Bill & Brecha, Robert, 2019. "Towards optimal 1.5° and 2 °C emission pathways for individual countries: A Finland case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Shan Yuan & Hong-Ze Gang & Yi-Fan Liu & Lei Zhou & Muhammad Irfan & Shi-Zhong Yang & Bo-Zhong Mu, 2022. "Adsorption and Diffusion Behaviors of CO 2 and CH 4 Mixtures in Different Types of Kerogens and Their Roles in Enhanced Energy Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    15. Jinwei Guo & Yanbing Qi & Jiaqi Luo & Guohong Du & Jingyan Sun & Xin Wei & Mukesh Kumar Soothar, 2025. "Carbon Emission Status and Regional Differences of China: High-Resolution Estimation of Spatially Explicit Carbon Emissions at the Prefecture Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-27, January.
    16. Balazs Pager & Zsuzsanna Zsibókb, 2020. "Regionalizing National-Level Growth Projections in the Visegrad Countries – The Issue Of Ex-Post Rescaling," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, JUNE.
    17. Zhang, Pengfei & Cai, Wenqiu & Yao, Mingtao & Wang, Zhiyou & Yang, Luzhen & Wei, Wendong, 2020. "Urban carbon emissions associated with electricity consumption in Beijing and the driving factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    18. Sheng Zheng & Yukuan Huang & Yu Sun, 2022. "Effects of Urban Form on Carbon Emissions in China: Implications for Low-Carbon Urban Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Arun Agrawal & Robin Mearns & Nicolas Perrin & Minna Kononen, 2011. "Area-Based Development, Local Institutions and Climate Adaptation," World Bank Publications - Reports 27313, The World Bank Group.
    20. Hermine Mitter & Anja-K Techene & Franz Sinabell & Katharina Helming & Kasper Kok & Jörg A Priess & Erwin Schmid & Benjamin L. Bodirsky & Ian Holman & Heikki Lehtonen & Adrian Leip & Chantal Le Mouël , 2019. "A protocol to develop Shared Socio-economic Pathways for European agriculture," Post-Print hal-02619037, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9009-:d:1768922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.