IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p8984-d1768199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting Sustainable Development of Inter-Regional Higher Education Through a Rationality-Based Evaluation of Development Gaps—Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Jia

    (Graduate School of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Haotian Xu

    (Graduate School of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

Abstract

How to keep inter-regional gaps in higher-education development within a reasonable range is a shared global challenge, yet much of the literature still treats zero gap as the benchmark. Grounded in the education-led development perspective, we posit that a gap is “reasonable” when education disparities are smaller than contemporaneous economic disparities. Based on this concept, this study develops a Development Equilibrium Index (DEI) framework. Using panel data for 31 Chinese provinces from 2003 to 2020, we find the following: (i) N-DEI is positive in most years, indicating that, overall, education gaps are smaller than economic gaps—consistent with higher education’s leading role in compressing economic gaps and supporting sustainability; (ii) At the provincial level, only 4 of 31 provinces (12.9%) show negative P-DEI , while the vast majority are positive, suggesting more supportive conditions to sustainable development. Furthermore, a median-based quadrant analysis for 2020 groups the 31 provinces into seven descriptive types, helping to interpret the variations in P-DEI signs and magnitudes and to inform targeted policy recommendations. The DEI thus reframes assessment from “narrowing gaps per se” to the goal of keeping education gaps below economic ones, providing a concise diagnostic tool for planning cohesive, resilient higher-education systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Jia & Haotian Xu, 2025. "Promoting Sustainable Development of Inter-Regional Higher Education Through a Rationality-Based Evaluation of Development Gaps—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:8984-:d:1768199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/8984/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/8984/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:8984-:d:1768199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.