IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p8973-d1767931.html

Port Sustainability and Probabilistic Assessment of Ship Moorings at Port Terminal Quays

Author

Listed:
  • Vytautas Paulauskas

    (Marine Engineering Department, Klaipeda University, H. Manto Str. 84, LT-92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

  • Donatas Paulauskas

    (Marine Engineering Department, Klaipeda University, H. Manto Str. 84, LT-92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

  • Vytas Paulauskas

    (Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Kaunas Technological University, Studentu Str. 48, LT-51368 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

The sustainability of a port is directly related to the time spent by ships in terminals and depends on the terminal, the technologies used in it, and external conditions. Currently used sustainable port terminal technologies allow a significant increase in the intensity of ship loading operations and, at the same time, shorten the time spent by ships at the quays. Since port construction processes take a lot of time, many ports have many quays every day that are not moored by ships. Ports try to attract passenger and cargo flows, but they are also not infinite. In individual port terminals, for example, container and Ro–Ro terminals, most of the time is spent on cargo processing inside the terminal, and only part of the time is spent on ship loading operations. Probabilistic assessment of ship mooring at quays allows an understanding of not only the optimal need for quays and modernization of their equipment, but at the same time for a more purposeful assessment of the possibilities of using quays, accepting diversification options and, therefore, optimizing the ports themselves as a sustainable port entity. The article presents a methodology for assessing berth occupancy focused on the development of a sustainable port based on probabilistic methods that would allow calculating potential berth occupancy. The developed methodology, compared to existing methodologies and models, allows for a more realistic assessment of the expected berth occupancy, using actual port and ship data. The presented theoretical and experimental research results confirm the suitability of the developed methodology for the development of a sustainable port and the possibilities of applying the developed methodology in any port, adapting it to specific port conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Vytautas Paulauskas & Donatas Paulauskas & Vytas Paulauskas, 2025. "Port Sustainability and Probabilistic Assessment of Ship Moorings at Port Terminal Quays," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:8973-:d:1767931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/8973/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/8973/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ziaul Haque Munim & Hans-Joachim Schramm, 2018. "The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Clark, Ximena & Dollar, David & Micco, Alejandro, 2004. "Port efficiency, maritime transport costs, and bilateral trade," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 417-450, December.
    3. Tiago A. Santos, 2025. "Sustainable Port Operations: Pollution Prevention and Mitigation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Sinan Gürel & Aysan Shadmand, 2019. "A heterogeneous fleet liner ship scheduling problem with port time uncertainty," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(4), pages 1153-1175, December.
    5. Caimao Tan & Junliang He, 2025. "Integrated proactive and reactive strategies for sustainable berth allocation and quay crane assignment under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 349(2), pages 879-910, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Courage Mlambo, 2021. "The Impact of Port Performance on Trade: The Case of Selected African States," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Amarendra Sahoo & Victor Nechifor & Emanuele Ferrari & Valeria Ferreira & Damit Serge Didier Amany, 2025. "On the positive economic impacts of port infrastructure development and seaborne trade efficiencies in Sub-Saharan Africa: the case of Senegal," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 27(3), pages 525-548, September.
    3. Imran Ur Rahman & Mohsin Shafi & Liu Junrong & Enitilina Tatiani M.K. Fetuu & Shah Fahad & Buddhi Prasad Sharma, 2021. "Infrastructure and Trade: An Empirical Study Based on China and Selected Asian Economies," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    4. David Bogataj & Francisco Campuzano-Bolarin & José Andrés Moreno Nicolás & Suresh P. Sethi, 2025. "Gravity modelling of intercontinental supply chains considering a new port location," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 33(4), pages 1227-1250, December.
    5. Metri F. Mdanat & Mohammad Al Hur & Omar M. Bwaliez & Ghazi A. Samawi & Raed Khasawneh, 2024. "Drivers of Port Competitiveness Among Low-, Upper-, and High-Income Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Elisa Barbieri & Luigi Capoani, 2025. "Renewable Energy, Resilience, Digitalization, and Industrial Policies in Seaborne Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Enock Kojo Ayesu & Daniel Sakyi & Alexander Bilson Darku, 2023. "Seaport efficiency, port throughput, and economic growth in Africa," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(3), pages 479-498, September.
    8. Alassane D. Yeo & Aimin Deng & Todine Y. Nadiedjoa, 2020. "The Effect of Infrastructure and Logistics Performance on Economic Performance: The Mediation Role of International Trade," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 55(4), pages 450-465, November.
    9. Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman, 2010. "Services Trade and Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(3), pages 642-692, September.
    10. Ismail Gbolahan Dere & Joel Ademola Ojekunle & Lekan Mohammed Sanni, 2025. "Analysis of the effects of berth characteristics on operational performance of Nigerian seaports," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Sun, Xiaolei & Liu, Chang & Wang, Jun & Li, Jianping, 2020. "Assessing the extreme risk spillovers of international commodities on maritime markets: A GARCH-Copula-CoVaR approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. SangHyun Cheon & Dong-Wook Song & Sungjin Park, 2018. "Does more competition result in better port performance?," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 433-455, September.
    13. Carlos Pestana Barros & Zhongfei Chen & Peter Wanke, 2016. "Efficiency in Chinese seaports: 2002–2012," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 18(3), pages 295-316, September.
    14. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Tei, Alessio, 2014. "Ports and regional development: A spatial analysis on a panel of European regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    15. Derek Kellenberg & Arik Levinson, 2019. "Misreporting trade: Tariff evasion, corruption, and auditing standards," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 106-129, February.
    16. Blyde, Juan & Molina, Danielken, 2015. "Logistic infrastructure and the international location of fragmented production," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 319-332.
    17. Patrick Plane, 2021. "What Factors Drive transport and Logistics Costs in Africa ?," Working Papers hal-03198081, HAL.
    18. Balie, Jean & Strutt, Anna & Nelgen, Signe & Narayanan, 2018. "Infrastructure investments for improved market access in subSaharan Africa: A CGE analysis," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(2), June.
    19. Gregory Whitten & Xiaoyi Dai & Simon Fan & Yu Pang, 2020. "Do political relations affect international trade? Evidence from China’s twelve trading partners," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, December.
    20. Jan Hoffmann & Naima Saeed & Sigbjørn Sødal, 2020. "Liner shipping bilateral connectivity and its impact on South Africa’s bilateral trade flows," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 473-499, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:8973-:d:1767931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.