IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p8967-d1767739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Digital Skills Affect Rural Households’ Incomes in China? An Explanation Derived from Factor Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Wang

    (Business School, Chizhou University, Chizhou 247000, China
    College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Zhijian Cai

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Zhen Zeng

    (Business School, Chizhou University, Chizhou 247000, China)

  • Chang Liu

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Raising rural household income is central to narrowing the rural–urban gap and advancing common prosperity. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), this study examines the impact of digital skills, a key for human capital, on rural Chinese households’ income and uses a fixed-effects model and the instrumental variable method to address endogeneity. The study finds that digital skills raise total household income, and each additional skill is associated with an increase of CNY 1678. By skill type, online business skills have the largest effect, followed by work–study skills, while entertainment–social skills are negatively associated with income. Heterogeneity analyses indicate larger gains for households with lower educational attainment and lower income, showing that a stronger regional digital environment amplifies these effects. Mechanism tests point to factor reallocation toward the nonfarm sector, via higher probabilities of off-farm employment and entrepreneurship and improved access to formal credit, as the primary pathway. Consistent with these channels, digital skills increase wages and operating income and reduce inequality in these components, as well as benefitting total income, but they have no detectable effect on property or transfer income or their dispersion. These findings point to key implications for boosting rural income growth and reducing inequality, namely strengthening digital skill development and optimizing the digital environment to enhance rural households’ endogenous income-generating capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Wang & Zhijian Cai & Zhen Zeng & Chang Liu, 2025. "How Do Digital Skills Affect Rural Households’ Incomes in China? An Explanation Derived from Factor Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:8967-:d:1767739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/8967/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/8967/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Xitong & He, Peiming & Liao, Honglin & Liu, Jindan & Chen, Litai, 2024. "Does network infrastructure construction reduce urban–rural income inequality? Based on the “Broadband China” policy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Xiumei Wang & Yongjian Huang & Yingying Zhao & Jingxuan Feng, 2023. "Digital Revolution and Employment Choice of Rural Labor Force: Evidence from the Perspective of Digital Skills," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Kelley, Erin M. & Ksoll, Christopher & Magruder, Jeremy, 2024. "How do digital platforms affect employment and job search? Evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Xie, Huilong & Zhang, Jiashu & Shao, Jingwen, 2023. "Difference in the influence of internet use on the relative poverty among farmers with different income structures," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 561-570.
    5. Zhenli Zhang & Yong Xia & Kahaer Abula, 2023. "How Digital Skills Affect Rural Labor Employment Choices? Evidence from Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Dzator, Janet & Acheampong, Alex O. & Appiah-Otoo, Isaac & Dzator, Michael, 2023. "Leveraging digital technology for development: Does ICT contribute to poverty reduction?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4).
    7. Fossen, Frank M. & Sorgner, Alina, 2022. "New digital technologies and heterogeneous wage and employment dynamics in the United States: Evidence from individual-level data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    8. Robert E. Hall & Charles I. Jones, 1999. "Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(1), pages 83-116.
    9. Hidalgo, Antonio & Gabaly, Samuel & Morales-Alonso, Gustavo & Urueña, Alberto, 2020. "The digital divide in light of sustainable development: An approach through advanced machine learning techniques," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid & Garcia-Perez, Alexeis & Candelo, Elena & Couturier, Jerome, 2021. "Exploring the impact of digital transformation on technology entrepreneurship and technological market expansion: The role of technology readiness, exploration and exploitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 100-111.
    11. Xiaofan Zuo & Zhisheng Hong, 2022. "The Impact of Digital Technology on Land Rent-Out Behavior: Information Sharing or Exclusion?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Gao, Jie & Li, Zhizhuo & Nguyen, Thithuha & Zhang, Wentao, 2025. "Digital transformation and enterprise employment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Wan, Guanghua & Hu, Xiaoshan & Liu, Weiqun, 2021. "China's poverty reduction miracle and relative poverty: Focusing on the roles of growth and inequality," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Feng, Yongqi & Dai, Jiahang & Zhang, Lei, 2025. "Digital infrastructure and income disparities: A quasi-natural experiment based on the "Broadband China" strategy," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Wenwu Zhang & Shunji Zhao & Jinguo Wang & Xinyao Xia & Hongkui Jin, 2024. "Rural Land Circulation and Peasant Household Income Growth—Empirical Research Based on Structural Decomposition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-24, August.
    16. Liu, Chang & Yi, Fujin, 2023. "Relative deprivation and health revisited: New evidence from middle-aged and older adults in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Chen Weng & Hui Wang & Nico Heerink & Marrit van den Berg, 2022. "Credit Constraints and Rural Households’ Entrepreneurial Performance in China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 570-583, January.
    18. Elinor Benami & Michael R. Carter, 2021. "Can digital technologies reshape rural microfinance? Implications for savings, credit, & insurance," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1196-1220, December.
    19. Mariscal Avilés, Judith & Benítez Larghi, Sebastián & Martínez Aguayo, María Angélica, 2016. "The informational life of the poor: A study of digital access in three Mexican towns," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 661-672.
    20. Tian Liu & Guangwen He & Calum G. Turvey, 2021. "Inclusive Finance, Farm Households Entrepreneurship, and Inclusive Rural Transformation in Rural Poverty-stricken Areas in China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 1929-1958, May.
    21. Li, Bin & Pan, Ya, 2025. "Digital inclusive finance and rural entrepreneurial survival: The moderating role of digital and financial literacy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1119-1136.
    22. Li, Xingguang & Zhang, Jianjun, 2024. "Rural digital credit and residential energy consumption: Evidence from the agricultural production perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Chen & Hao Cheng & Fujia Li & Zihan Song, 2025. "Can Digital Infrastructure Construction Promote Energy Conservation in Resource-Based Cities? Evidence from the “Broadband China” Strategy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Phan, Van-Phuc, 2023. "Is the internet penetration pro-poor? Evidence from a panel data analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8).
    3. Ningze Yang & Yiwei Wang & Hui Jin & Qi Qi & Yongliang Yang, 2025. "Impacts of Internet Information Literacy on Farmers’ Relative Poverty Vulnerability: Evidence from CGSS Survey Data in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 1169-1200, July.
    4. Yingzheng Yan & Liupeng Chen & Ziwei Zhou & Yuanzhu Wei, 2025. "Digital financial inclusion and agricultural modernization development in China—a study based on the perspective of agricultural mechanization services," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Intini, Mario & Nademi, Younes, 2025. "Rethinking poverty: An econometric analysis of the role of ICT poverty in a global context," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    6. Jianling Qi & Huanjiao Li & Wenlong Li & Jing Jin & Feng Ye, 2024. "The Influence of Digital Skills on Farm Households’ Vulnerability to Relative Poverty: Implications for the Sustainability of Farmers’ Livelihoods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Yang, Yaofeng & Jiang, Mingchun & Li, Xiuqing & Chen, Yajuan, 2024. "Energy poverty and household development resilience: Household level evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    8. Ping Wang & Ruisheng Zhang & Lu Liu, 2025. "The Digital Economy and Common Prosperity: Empirical Evidence from Multidimensional Relative Poverty in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-25, September.
    9. repec:ilo:ilowps:366690 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Vieira, Flávio & MacDonald, Ronald & Damasceno, Aderbal, 2012. "The role of institutions in cross-section income and panel data growth models: A deeper investigation on the weakness and proliferation of instruments," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 127-140.
    11. Eicher, Theo S. & Schreiber, Till, 2010. "Structural policies and growth: Time series evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 169-179, January.
    12. Sylvie Démurger & Jeffrey D. Sachs & Wing Thye Woo & Shuming Bao & Gene Chang & Andrew Mellinger, 2002. "Geography, Economic Policy, and Regional Development in China," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 1(1), pages 146-197.
    13. Alexandre Janiak & Paulo Santos Monteiro, 2011. "Inflation and Welfare in Long‐Run Equilibrium with Firm Dynamics," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(5), pages 795-834, August.
    14. Nilanjan Banik & John Gilbert, 2010. "Regional Integration and Trade Costs in South Asia," Chapters, in: Douglas H. Brooks & Susan F. Stone (ed.), Trade Facilitation and Regional Cooperation in Asia, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Haidar, Jamal Ibrahim, 2012. "The impact of business regulatory reforms on economic growth," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 285-307.
    16. Lederman, Daniel,Saenz, Laura, 2005. "Innovation and development around the world, 1960-2000," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3774, The World Bank.
    17. Löschel, Andreas & Pothen, Frank & Schymura, Michael, 2015. "Peeling the onion: Analyzing aggregate, national and sectoral energy intensity in the European Union," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(S1), pages 63-75.
    18. Joshua Hall & Robert Lawson, 2008. "Theory and evidence on economic freedom and economic growth: A comment," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 15(18), pages 1-6.
    19. Cristiana & Teodora Borota, 2011. "World Trade Patterns and Prices: The Role of Productivity and Quality Heterogeneity," Working papers 19, National Bank of Serbia.
    20. Graziella Bertocchi, 2016. "The legacies of slavery in and out of Africa," IZA Journal of Migration and Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    21. Kui-Wai Li & Tung Liu & Lihong Yun, 2007. "Technology Progress, Efficiency, and Scale of Economy in Post-reform China," Working Papers 200701, Ball State University, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2007.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:8967-:d:1767739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.