IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8953-d1767460.html

Does Quality of Life Influence Pro-Environmental Intention? An Extension of Theory of Planned Behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Suk Min Pang

    (Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Persiaran Multimedia, Cyberjaya 63100, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Hasni Mohd Hanafi

    (Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Persiaran Multimedia, Cyberjaya 63100, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Choy Yoke Chong

    (Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Persiaran Multimedia, Cyberjaya 63100, Selangor, Malaysia)

  • Booi Chen Tan

    (Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Persiaran Multimedia, Cyberjaya 63100, Selangor, Malaysia)

Abstract

In light of escalating global environmental deterioration, studies on pro-environmental intention and behaviour with the ultimate goal of identifying contributing factors to minimise environmental issues are common. Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is widely used to study environmental intentions and behaviours. However, how quality of life (QoL) influences these intentions and interactions among TPB’s own variables within a single research framework has not been thoroughly explored. Therefore, this study extends TPB by incorporating the four dimensions of QoL, as measured by the Control, Autonomy, Self-Realisation, and Pleasure (CASP-19) scale, to understand pro-environmental intentions from Malaysian viewpoints. In this study, quantitative approach was applied, and the data were collected from Malaysians aged 18 and above (N = 182) in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), a two-step approach was employed to assess the measurement and structural models. The findings confirmed Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) is a robust model for environmental studies showing that subjective norm and perceived behavioural control significantly influence attitudes toward pro-environmental behaviour, ultimately leading to pro-environmental intention. Interestingly, this study found no relationship between QoL dimensions and pro-environmental intention. Lastly, both theoretical and managerial implications were discussed, and research limitations and suggestions for future research directions were put forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Suk Min Pang & Hasni Mohd Hanafi & Choy Yoke Chong & Booi Chen Tan, 2025. "Does Quality of Life Influence Pro-Environmental Intention? An Extension of Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8953-:d:1767460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8953/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8953/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siow Li Lai & Nai Peng Tey, 2021. "The Quality of Life of Older Adults in a Multiethnic Metropolitan: An Analysis of CASP-19," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    2. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    3. Faiq Aziz & Ahmad Aizuddin Md Rami & Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh & Seyedali Ahrari, 2021. "Effects of Emotions and Ethics on Pro-Environmental Behavior of University Employees: A Model Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Young-Jae Kim & Seung-Woo Kang, 2020. "The Quality of Life, Psychological Health, and Occupational Calling of Korean Workers: Differences by the New Classes of Occupation Emerging Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Hong Tian & Xinyu Liu, 2022. "Pro-Environmental Behavior Research: Theoretical Progress and Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Oscar Ribeiro & Laetitia Teixeira & Lia Araújo & Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez & Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga & Maria João Forjaz, 2020. "Anxiety, Depression and Quality of Life in Older Adults: Trajectories of Influence across Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Van Tonder, E. & Fullerton, S. & De Beer, L.T. & Saunders, S.G., 2023. "Social and personal factors influencing green customer citizenship behaviours: The role of subjective norm, internal values and attitudes," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marina Baroni & Giulia Valdrighi & Andrea Guazzini & Mirko Duradoni, 2025. "Eco-Sensitive Minds: Clustering Readiness to Change and Environmental Sensitivity for Sustainable Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Bireswar Dutta, 2025. "Understanding Pro-Environmental Behavior in Sustainable Mobility: An Integrated Framework for Electric Vehicle (EV) Purchase Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Yinuo Chu & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2025. "Investigating the Impact of Social Marketing on Tourists’ Behavior for Attaining Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Song, Jiawen & Cai, Lanhui & Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin, 2023. "Exploring consumers’ usage intention of reusable express packaging: An extended norm activation model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Hung-Yu Chen & Raofeng Guo & Chin-Chao Hung & Zong-Han Lin & Mengshan Wu, 2023. "Behavioral Intentions of Bank Employees to Implement Green Finance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Lu, Ke & Xu, Yuan, 2024. "The continuance behavioral intention to adopt electrified ride-sourcing: Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    7. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison & Wei Wei & Xihua Zhang, 2022. "Landscape and Unique Fascination: A Dual-Case Study on the Antecedents of Tourist Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intentions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Taraghi, Mahdi & Yoder, Landon, 2025. "Integrating the theory of planned behavior in agent-based models: A systematic review of applications of pro-environmental behaviors," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
    9. Ismail Ataher Ab Albakoush & Askin Kiraz, 2025. "Investigating the Impact of Corporate Environmental Sustainability Motivations on Environmental Management Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Li, Chuang & Yang, Xiaofan & Wang, Liping, 2025. "Public energy conservation behavior and the impact of tiered pricing: Based on water, electricity and gas consumption measurements in typical urban households in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    11. Anisur Rehman, 2025. "Impact of environmental values, pro-environmental behavior, and pricing on purchase intention of electric vehicles," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 22(4), pages 929-955, December.
    12. Kumar, Jai & Huang, Jinyan & Kumari, Joti, 2026. "Drivers of green consumer behavior in hotels: The roles of green attitudes and environmental gardening identity (PLS-SEM and fsQCA evidence)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Lili Geng & Yuanyuan Zhang & Xiaomeng Liang & Yongji Xue, 2025. "Uncovering the combined effects of behavioral costs, awareness of consequences, and emotional exhaustion on farmers’ behavioral intentions to recycle agricultural waste," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Tang, Decai & Obuobi, Bright & Nketiah, Emmanuel & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson, 2025. "Breaking the energy crisis: Does the role of government support impact Ghanaians' intention to adopt sustainable energy from food waste?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    15. Seemab Rana & Fazilathunissa Shafi & Aimen Rasheed & Muhammad Imran Malik, 2024. "Online environmental platforms service and green consumer behavior nexus: a multi-mediator study," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Lurdes Jesus Ferreira & Jieling Liu, 2023. "Social Determinants, Motivation, and Communication: How People Perceive and Choose Sustainable Mobility at a Local Level in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    19. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    20. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8953-:d:1767460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.