Author
Listed:
- Roula Aad
(Department of Landscape and Territory Planning, Faculty of Agronomy, Lebanese University, Dekwaneh P.O. Box 90775, Lebanon
Climate Resilience in Agriculture and Biodiversity (CRAB), Higher Center for Research, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon)
- Nour Zaher
(Department of Landscape and Territory Planning, Faculty of Agronomy, Lebanese University, Dekwaneh P.O. Box 90775, Lebanon)
- Victoria Dawalibi
(Department of Landscape and Territory Planning, Faculty of Agronomy, Lebanese University, Dekwaneh P.O. Box 90775, Lebanon)
- Rodrigue el Balaa
(Department of Agriculture, Issam Fares Faculty of Technology, University of Balamand, Tripoli P.O. Box 100, Lebanon)
- Jane Loukieh
(Department of Interior Architecture, Faculty of Fine Arts and Architecture, Lebanese University, Deir el Qamar P.O. Box 6573/14, Lebanon)
- Nabil Nemer
(Climate Resilience in Agriculture and Biodiversity (CRAB), Higher Center for Research, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon
Department of Agriculture and Food Engineering, School of Engineering, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh P.O. Box 446, Lebanon)
Abstract
Landscapes are vital systems where ecological, cultural, perceptual, and socio-economic values meet, making their quality assessment essential for sustainable development. Landscape Quality (LQ), shaped by the interaction of natural processes and human activities, remains methodologically challenging due to its interdisciplinarity and the need to integrate multiple dimensions. This challenge is particularly perceived in peri-urban areas, predominantly understudied in landscape research. This article addresses this gap in LQ assessment at peri-urban landscapes, through the case of Houch Al Oumaraa, Zahleh, a peri-urban area of patrimonial significance and agricultural landscape value. To evaluate the four spatial dimensions of LQ (structural, ecological, cultural and visual), we adopted a mixed methodology, where a pre-developed set of landscape indicators (LIs) applied within GIS and spatial technics, were supplemented by expert analysis through visual studies. Two questions framed this research: (i) is remote sensing sufficient to assess peri-urban LQ, and (ii) what are the limits of applying pre-developed LIs to diverse landscape contexts? Results show moderate fragmentation (CONTAG 61.6%), low diversity (MSDI 0.27), high density of cultural monuments (PROTAP 4.19) and average visual disharmony (FCDHI 0.49). Findings reveal that spatial dimensions alone are insufficient for assessing LQ of peri-urban landscapes, where socio-economic dimensions must also be integrated. Structural indicators (PLAND, MPA, ED, CONTAG) and MSDI proved transferable, while ECOLBAR was less applicable, cultural indicators (PROTAP, HLE) were limited to tangible heritage, and visual indicators (FCDHI, SDHI) highly context dependent. Establishing a differentiated yet standardized framework would not only enhance methodological precision but also ensure that LQ assessment remain relevant across diverse contexts, providing policymakers with actionable insights to align planning with sustainability goals.
Suggested Citation
Roula Aad & Nour Zaher & Victoria Dawalibi & Rodrigue el Balaa & Jane Loukieh & Nabil Nemer, 2025.
"The Application of Landscape Indicators for Landscape Quality Assessment; Case of Zahleh, Lebanon,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8946-:d:1767204
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8946-:d:1767204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.