IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8863-d1764662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Governance Pressure and the Co-Benefit of Carbon Emissions Reduction: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment on 2012 Air Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Sun

    (School of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, No.1, Erxianqiao East Third Road, Chenghua District, Chengdu 610051, China
    Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Chengdu University of Technology, No.1, Erxianqiao East Third Road, Chenghua District, Chengdu 610051, China)

  • Wu Deng

    (School of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, No.1, Erxianqiao East Third Road, Chenghua District, Chengdu 610051, China
    Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Chengdu University of Technology, No.1, Erxianqiao East Third Road, Chenghua District, Chengdu 610051, China)

  • Hui Gao

    (Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Chengdu University of Technology, No.1, Erxianqiao East Third Road, Chenghua District, Chengdu 610051, China
    School of Business, Chengdu University of Technology, No.1, Erxianqiao East Third Road, Chenghua District, Chengdu 610051, China)

  • Zhongliang Nie

    (School of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, No.1, Erxianqiao East Third Road, Chenghua District, Chengdu 610051, China
    Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Chengdu University of Technology, No.1, Erxianqiao East Third Road, Chenghua District, Chengdu 610051, China)

Abstract

Achieving carbon emission reduction synergy is vital for green economic transformation. This study examines whether environmental governance pressure promotes such synergy, simultaneously driving carbon reduction and pollution control. Leveraging the 2012 Ambient Air Quality Standard as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ a continuous difference-in-differences (DID) method on 250 prefecture-level cities from 2009 to 2022. Our findings reveal that increased environmental governance pressure significantly reduces both the total amount and intensity of carbon emissions, demonstrating a clear synergistic effect. This synergy is positively correlated with reductions in major air pollutants (e.g., SO 2 and NO x ), indicating that pressure curbs both the total amount and intensity of carbon emissions. Mechanistic analysis shows that this pressure primarily curtails carbon emissions by fostering green innovation and accelerating cleaner energy transitions, with no ‘green paradox’. It also promotes low-carbon industrial restructuring while reducing reliance on end-of-pipe pollution management. Heterogeneity analysis indicates stronger synergistic effects in regions with lower emission reduction costs (e.g., western China, less developed industrial bases). We recommend robust central government environmental regulation policies to amplify local governance pressure, strengthen carbon reduction synergy, and facilitate continuous green development.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Sun & Wu Deng & Hui Gao & Zhongliang Nie, 2025. "Environmental Governance Pressure and the Co-Benefit of Carbon Emissions Reduction: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment on 2012 Air Standards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-31, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8863-:d:1764662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8863/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8863/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8863-:d:1764662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.