IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8854-d1764381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Regional Public Transport Evaluation Indicators for Advanced Mobility Systems: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ran Du

    (Faculty of Engineering, Gifu University, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan)

  • Fumitaka Kurauchi

    (Faculty of Engineering, Gifu University, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan)

  • Toshiyuki Nakamura

    (Faculty of Engineering, Gifu University, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193, Japan)

  • Masahiro Kuwahara

    (Social System PF Development Division, Toyota Motor Corporation (Japan), 1-6-1 Otemachi, Chiyoda City 100-0004, Tokyo, Japan)

Abstract

The emergence of advanced mobility systems, including Demand Responsive Transport (DRT), shared mobility, and Mobility as a Service (MaaS), has required a reassessment of the evaluation indicators for public transportation systems. Existing studies often address only limited aspects and lack a comprehensive, structured classification, while the unique impacts of advanced systems remain insufficiently captured. Moreover, little attention has been given to which indicators are suitable for simulation despite their growing role in transport planning. To fill these gaps, this study develops a structured classification of quantitative evaluation indicators from the existing literature, serving as a foundation for assessing advanced mobility systems. It highlights system-specific characteristics, identifies relevant indicators, and examines their correspondence with conventional ones. Furthermore, it explores the applicability of these indicators in simulation environments, offering guidance for selecting representative indicators in simulation setup, operational monitoring, and impact assessment. Finally, it highlights the potential of quantitative indicators to approximate qualitative ones, suggesting directions for future research in simulation-based evaluation. By integrating environmental, economic, and societal dimensions, this study contributes to a sustainability-oriented framework for evaluating advanced mobility systems, providing insights for both academic research and practical mobility planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ran Du & Fumitaka Kurauchi & Toshiyuki Nakamura & Masahiro Kuwahara, 2025. "Assessing Regional Public Transport Evaluation Indicators for Advanced Mobility Systems: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-37, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8854-:d:1764381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8854/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8854/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Redman, Lauren & Friman, Margareta & Gärling, Tommy & Hartig, Terry, 2013. "Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 119-127.
    2. Urbanek, Anna, 2021. "Potential of modal shift from private cars to public transport: A survey on the commuters’ attitudes and willingness to switch – A case study of Silesia Province, Poland," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Frappier, Alexis & Morency, Catherine & Trépanier, Martin, 2018. "Measuring the quality and diversity of transit alternatives," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 51-59.
    4. Nicole Ronald & Russell Thompson & Stephan Winter, 2015. "Simulating Demand-responsive Transportation: A Review of Agent-based Approaches," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 404-421, July.
    5. Zhang, Haoran & Chen, Jinyu & Li, Wenjing & Song, Xuan & Shibasaki, Ryosuke, 2020. "Mobile phone GPS data in urban ride-sharing: An assessment method for emission reduction potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    6. Wei Yu & Xiaofei Ye & Jun Chen & Xingchen Yan & Tao Wang, 2020. "Evaluation Indexes and Correlation Analysis of Origination–Destination Travel Time of Nanjing Metro Based on Complex Network Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Zhao, Yu & Yingrui, Gou & Moru, Li & Zhifeng, Zhao & Pengjun, Zhao, 2025. "Mobility constraints of residents in marginal rural areas of megacities: Evidence from Beijing, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    8. Lu, Qing-Long & Qurashi, Moeid & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2023. "Simulation-based policy analysis: The case of urban speed limits," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Hamidi, Zahra & Camporeale, Rosalia & Caggiani, Leonardo, 2019. "Inequalities in access to bike-and-ride opportunities: Findings for the city of Malmö," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 673-688.
    10. Ana Belén Rodríguez González & Mark Richard Wilby & Juan José Vinagre Díaz & Rubén Fernández Pozo & Carmen Sánchez Ávila, 2023. "Utilization rate of the fleet: a novel performance metric for a novel shared mobility," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 285-301, February.
    11. Di Yao & Liqun Xu & Jinpei Li, 2019. "Evaluating the Performance of Public Transit Systems: A Case Study of Eleven Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Shibayama, Takeru & Laa, Barbara, 2024. "Sustainable Mobility Guarantee: Developing the concept from a transport planning perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 287-299.
    13. Eboli, Laura & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2011. "A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger's point of view," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 172-181, January.
    14. Fadaei, Masoud & Cats, Oded, 2016. "Evaluating the impacts and benefits of public transport design and operational measures," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 105-116.
    15. Haochun Yang & Yunyi Liang, 2023. "Examining the Connectivity between Urban Rail Transport and Regular Bus Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Crawford, F. & Watling, D.P. & Connors, R.D., 2018. "Identifying road user classes based on repeated trip behaviour using Bluetooth data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 55-74.
    17. Ali, Nazam & Sagmanli, Seda Sucu & Ouelhadj, Djamila & Dadashzadeh, Nima & Woods, Lee & Fletcher, Graham, 2025. "Monitoring and evaluation of travel behaviour change in mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) trials: Insights from a longitudinal study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 996-1011.
    18. Lopez-Carreiro, Iria & Monzon, Andres & Lopez-Lambas, Maria E., 2021. "Comparison of the willingness to adopt MaaS in Madrid (Spain) and Randstad (The Netherlands) metropolitan areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 275-294.
    19. Sheth, Chintan & Triantis, Konstantinos & Teodorovic, Dusan, 2007. "Performance evaluation of bus routes: A provider and passenger perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 453-478, July.
    20. Daraio, Cinzia & Diana, Marco & Di Costa, Flavia & Leporelli, Claudio & Matteucci, Giorgio & Nastasi, Alberto, 2016. "Efficiency and effectiveness in the urban public transport sector: A critical review with directions for future research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 1-20.
    21. Shaowu Cheng & Qian Gao & Yaping Zhang, 2016. "Evaluating the Impacts of Bus Fare on Social Equity Based on IC Card Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-15, October.
    22. Chen, Xumei & Yu, Lei & Zhang, Yushi & Guo, Jifu, 2009. "Analyzing urban bus service reliability at the stop, route, and network levels," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 722-734, October.
    23. Chen, Zhiwei & Guo, Yujie & Stuart, Amy L. & Zhang, Yu & Li, Xiaopeng, 2019. "Exploring the equity performance of bike-sharing systems with disaggregated data: A story of southern Tampa," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 529-545.
    24. Guo-Ling Jia & Rong-Guo Ma & Zhi-Hua Hu, 2019. "Urban Transit Network Properties Evaluation and Optimization Based on Complex Network Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    25. Wang, Siqin & Liu, Yan & Corcoran, Jonathan, 2021. "Equity of public transport costs before and after a fare policy reform: An empirical evaluation using smartcard data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 104-118.
    26. Graham Currie & Majid Sarvi & Bill Young, 2007. "A new approach to evaluating on-road public transport priority projects: balancing the demand for limited road-space," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 413-428, July.
    27. Zhang, Chunqin & Juan, Zhicai & Luo, Qingyu & Xiao, Guangnian, 2016. "Performance evaluation of public transit systems using a combined evaluation method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 156-167.
    28. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    29. Huang, Wencheng & Shuai, Bin & Sun, Yan & Wang, Yang & Antwi, Eric, 2018. "Using entropy-TOPSIS method to evaluate urban rail transit system operation performance: The China case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 292-303.
    30. Becker, Henrik & Balac, Milos & Ciari, Francesco & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Assessing the welfare impacts of Shared Mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 228-243.
    31. Velasco, Alexandra & Gerike, Regine, 2024. "A composite index for the evaluation of sustainability in Latin American public transport systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    32. Mingzhu Song & Yi Zhang & Meng Li & Yi Zhang, 2021. "Accessibility of Transit Stops with Multiple Feeder Modes: Walking and Private-Bike Cycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    33. Yeh, Chung-Hsing & Deng, Hepu & Chang, Yu-Hern, 2000. "Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 459-473, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hassan, Mohammad Nurul & Hawas, Yaser E. & Ahmed, Kamran, 2013. "A multi-dimensional framework for evaluating the transit service performance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-61.
    2. Md. Nazmul Huda Naim & Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani Adnan & Ashraf Dewan & Khatun E. Zannat, 2022. "Assessing the performance of public transport services in a developing country: A case study using data envelopment analysis," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 377-409, March.
    3. Yao, Di & Xu, Liqun & Li, Jinpei, 2020. "Does technical efficiency play a mediating role between bus facility scale and ridership attraction? Evidence from bus practices in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 77-96.
    4. Wan, Dan & Kamga, Camille & Liu, Jun & Sugiura, Aaron & Beaton, Eric B., 2016. "Rider perception of a “light” Bus Rapid Transit system - The New York City Select Bus Service," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 41-55.
    5. Aydin, Nezir & Celik, Erkan & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2015. "A hierarchical customer satisfaction framework for evaluating rail transit systems of Istanbul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 61-81.
    6. Gao, Sa & Ran, Qingsong & Su, Zicheng & Wang, Ling & Ma, Wanjing & Hao, Ruochen, 2024. "Evaluation system for urban traffic intelligence based on travel experiences: A sentiment analysis approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Benedetto Barabino & Nicola Aldo Cabras & Claudio Conversano & Alessandro Olivo, 2020. "An Integrated Approach to Select Key Quality Indicators in Transit Services," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 1045-1080, June.
    8. Benedetto Barabino, 2018. "Automatic recognition of “low-quality” vehicles and bus stops in bus services," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 257-289, August.
    9. Link, Heike, 2019. "The impact of including service quality into efficiency analysis: The case of franchising regional rail passenger serves in Germany," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 284-300.
    10. Chen, Zhiwei & Li, Xiaopeng, 2021. "Unobserved heterogeneity in transportation equity analysis: Evidence from a bike-sharing system in southern Tampa," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Celik, Erkan & Aydin, Nezir & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2014. "A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 283-293.
    12. Ahmed Derbel & Younes Boujelbene, 2023. "Performance classification of Tunisian public transport operators," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 535-574, June.
    13. Juan de Oña & Rocio de Oña, 2015. "Quality of Service in Public Transport Based on Customer Satisfaction Surveys: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Approaches," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 605-622, August.
    14. Daniel (Jian) Sun & Shukai Chen & Chun Zhang & Suwan Shen, 2016. "A bus route evaluation model based on GIS and super-efficient data envelopment analysis," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 407-423, June.
    15. Wey, Wann-Ming & Kang, Chao-Chung & Khan, Haider A., 2020. "Evaluating the effects of environmental factors and a transfer fare discount policy on the performance of an urban metro system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 172-185.
    16. Mahmood Mahmoodi Nesheli & Avishai (Avi) Ceder & Robin Brissaud, 2017. "Public transport service-quality elements based on real-time operational tactics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 957-975, September.
    17. Ji, Wei & Huang, Zhengfeng & Gao, Gao & Zheng, Pengjun, 2024. "Evaluation of integrated transport efficiency and equity at the county level——taking the counties in ningbo city as an example," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 257-272.
    18. Yunqiang Xue & Lin Cheng & Kuang Wang & Jing An & Hongzhi Guan, 2020. "System Dynamics Analysis of the Relationship between Transit Metropolis Construction and Sustainable Development of Urban Transportation—Case Study of Nanchang City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, April.
    19. Sweet, Matthias N. & Scott, Darren M., 2021. "Shared mobility adoption from 2016 to 2018 in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: Demographic or geographic diffusion?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Violeta Lukic Vujadinovic & Aleksandar Damnjanovic & Aleksandar Cakic & Dragan R. Petkovic & Marijana Prelevic & Vladan Pantovic & Mirjana Stojanovic & Dejan Vidojevic & Djordje Vranjes & Istvan Bodol, 2024. "AI-Driven Approach for Enhancing Sustainability in Urban Public Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8854-:d:1764381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.