IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8853-d1764333.html

From Abstraction to Realization: A Diagrammatic BIM Framework for Conceptual Design in Architectural Education

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy Alassaf

    (Department of Architecture Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan)

Abstract

The conceptual design phase in architecture establishes the foundation for subsequent design decisions and influences up to 80% of a building’s lifecycle environmental impact. While Building Information Modeling (BIM) demonstrates transformative potential for sustainable design, its application during conceptual design remains constrained by perceived technical complexity and limited support for abstract thinking. This research examines how BIM tools can facilitate conceptual design through diagrammatic reasoning, thereby bridging technical capabilities with creative exploration. A mixed-methods approach was employed to develop and validate a Diagrammatic BIM (D-BIM) framework. It integrates diagrammatic reasoning, parametric modeling, and performance evaluation within BIM environments. The framework defines three core relationships—dissection, articulation, and actualization—which enable transitions from abstract concepts to detailed architectural forms in Revit’s modeling environments. Using Richard Meier’s architectural language as a structured test case, a 14-week quasi-experimental study with 19 third-year architecture students assessed the framework’s effectiveness through pre- and post-surveys, observations, and artifact analysis. Statistical analysis revealed significant improvements ( p < 0.05) with moderate to large effect sizes across all measures, including systematic design thinking, diagram utilization, and academic self-efficacy. Students demonstrated enhanced design iteration, abstraction-to-realization transitions, and performance-informed decision-making through quantitative and qualitative assessments during early design stages. However, the study’s limitations include a small, single-institution sample, the absence of a control group, a focus on a single architectural language, and the exploratory integration of environmental analysis tools. Findings indicate that the framework repositions BIM as a cognitive design environment that supports creative ideation while integrating structured design logic and performance analysis. The study advances Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) by embedding critical, systems-based, and problem-solving competencies, demonstrating BIM’s role in sustainability-focused early design. This research provides preliminary evidence that conceptual design and BIM are compatible when supported with diagrammatic reasoning, offering a foundation for integrating competency-based digital pedagogy that bridges creative and technical dimensions of architectural design.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy Alassaf, 2025. "From Abstraction to Realization: A Diagrammatic BIM Framework for Conceptual Design in Architectural Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-29, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8853-:d:1764333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8853/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8853/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quentin Ssossé & Johanna Wagner & Carina Hopper, 2021. "Assessing the Impact of ESD: Methods, Challenges, Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Tian Han & Qiong Huang & Anxiao Zhang & Qi Zhang, 2018. "Simulation-Based Decision Support Tools in the Early Design Stages of a Green Building—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Marcelle Feitoza Bassi Costa & Carla Martins Cipolla, 2025. "Critical Soft Skills for Sustainability in Higher Education: A Multi-Phase Qualitative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Fermín Sánchez-Carracedo & Jordi Segalas & Gorka Bueno & Pere Busquets & Joan Climent & Victor G. Galofré & Boris Lazzarini & David Lopez & Carme Martín & Rafael Miñano & Estíbaliz Sáez de Cámara & Bá, 2021. "Tools for Embedding and Assessing Sustainable Development Goals in Engineering Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-30, November.
    5. María-José Terrón-López & Paloma J. Velasco-Quintana & Silvia Lavado-Anguera & María del Carmen Espinosa-Elvira, 2020. "Preparing Sustainable Engineers: A Project-Based Learning Experience in Logistics with Refugee Camps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Adolfo Cazorla-Montero & Ignacio de los Ríos-Carmenado & Juan Ignacio Pasten, 2019. "Sustainable Development Planning: Master’s Based on a Project-Based Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Stanislav Avsec & Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk & Agnieszka Żabicka & Joanna Gil-Mastalerczyk & Agata Gawlak, 2024. "Human-Centered Systems Thinking in Technology-Enhanced Sustainable and Inclusive Architectural Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-45, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gemma Tejedor & Fermín Sánchez-Carracedo & Jordi Segalàs, 2022. "Education for Sustainable Development in Higher Education-Introduction to a Special Issue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-6, August.
    2. Younghun Choi & Takuro Kobashi & Yoshiki Yamagata & Akito Murayama, 2021. "Assessment of waterfront office redevelopment plan on optimal building energy demand and rooftop photovoltaics for urban decarbonization," Papers 2108.09029, arXiv.org.
    3. Manuel Mieres-Chacaltana & Sonia Salvo-Garrido & Sergio Dominguez-Lara, 2025. "Modeling the Effects of Teacher Resilience and Self-Efficacy on Prosocialness: Implications for Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Irina Makarova & Larisa Gubacheva & Larisa Gabsalikhova & Vadim Mavrin & Aleksey Boyko, 2025. "Developing Intelligent Integrated Solutions to Improve Pedestrian Safety for Sustainable Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-31, October.
    5. Ghada Elshafei & Silvia Vilcekova & Martina Zelenakova & Abdelazim M. Negm, 2021. "Towards an Adaptation of Efficient Passive Design for Thermal Comfort Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Rohit Agrawal & Abhijit Majumdar & Kirty Majumdar & Rakesh D. Raut & Balkrishna E. Narkhede, 2022. "Attaining sustainable development goals (SDGs) through supply chain practices and business strategies: A systematic review with bibliometric and network analyses," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3669-3687, November.
    7. Che Ting Chien & Chao Heng Chien, 2025. "Evaluating Problem-Based Learning in an ESG-Centered General Education Course: A Mixed-Methods Study of Student Competency Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Shan Dai & Wenfeng Bai & Jing Xiao, 2024. "Balancing Environmental Impact and Practicality: A Case Study on the Cement-Stabilized Rammed Earth Construction in Southeast Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Clemente Rodríguez-Sabiote & Álvaro Manuel Úbeda-Sánchez & José Álvarez-Rodríguez & Daniel Álvarez-Ferrándiz, 2020. "Active Learning in an Environment of Innovative Training and Sustainability. Mapping of the Conceptual Structure of Research Fronts through a Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Singh, Manav Mahan & Singaravel, Sundaravelpandian & Geyer, Philipp, 2021. "Machine learning for early stage building energy prediction: Increment and enrichment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    11. Shatha Mustafa Abdallah Al Qudah & José Luis Fuentes Bargues & Pablo Ferrer Gisbert & Hani Na'el Al‐Abdallat, 2025. "AI‐Driven Risk Management to Promote SDGs? An Exploratory Study in Jordan Construction Sector," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(S1), pages 1107-1123, November.
    12. Adolfo Cazorla-Montero & Ignacio De los Ríos-Carmenado, 2023. "From “Putting the Last First” to “Working with People” in Rural Development Planning: A Bibliometric Analysis of 50 Years of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    13. Noor Hamwy & Jennifer Bruder & Abdellatif Sellami & Michael H. Romanowski, 2023. "Challenges to Teachers Implementing Sustainable Development Goals Frameworks in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Walaa Al Husban, 2025. "The Impact of Integrating Sustainable Development Goals on Students’ Awareness and Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Case Study of Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Victor Takashi Hayashi & Reginaldo Arakaki & Felipe Valencia de Almeida & Wilson Vicente Ruggiero, 2023. "The Development of Sustainable Engineering with PjBL during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Ramy Mahmoud & John M. Kamara & Neil Burford, 2020. "Opportunities and Limitations of Building Energy Performance Simulation Tools in the Early Stages of Building Design in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
    17. Mackenzie Warren & Blake Rosenberg & Scott Rayburg & John Rodwell, 2025. "Are Accreditation Bodies Holding Back Sustainability in Civil Engineering Education in Australia? An Analysis of Syllabi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Säwén, Toivo & Sasic Kalagasidis, Angela & Hollberg, Alexander, 2024. "Critical perspectives on life cycle building performance assessment tool reviews," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    19. Zhou, Kai & Leng, Jia-Wei, 2023. "State-of-the-art research of performance-driven architectural design for low-carbon urban underground space: Systematic review and proposed design strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Renato Martins Neves & Rui M. Lima & Diana Mesquita, 2021. "Teacher Competences for Active Learning in Engineering Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8853-:d:1764333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.