IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8806-d1762270.html

Innovation Dynamics and Ethical Considerations of Agentic Artificial Intelligence in the Transition to a Net-Zero Carbon Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Subhra Mondal

    (Department of Marketing, SouthStar Management Institute, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Cao Thục Uyen

    (Department of Marketing, SouthStar Management Institute, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam)

  • Subhankar Das

    (Department of Marketing, SouthStar Management Institute, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam)

  • Vasiliki G. Vrana

    (Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Administration, The Campus of Serres, International Hellenic University, 62124 Serres, Greece)

Abstract

As climate action becomes increasingly urgent, nations and institutions worldwide seek advanced technologies for practical mitigation efforts. This study examines how agentic artificial intelligence systems capable of decision-making and learning from experience drive innovation dynamics in climate change mitigation, with a particular focus on ethical considerations during the net-zero transition. The current urgency of climate action demands advanced technologies, yet organisations struggle to effectively deploy agentic AI for climate mitigation due to unclear implementation pathways and ethical consideration. This study examines the relationships among agentic AI capabilities, innovation dynamics, and net-zero transition performance, using survey data from 340 organisations across the manufacturing, energy, and technology sectors, and analysed using structural equation modelling. Based on dynamic capabilities theory, this research proposes a novel theoretical model that examines how agentic AI drives innovation dynamics in climate change mitigation within governance frameworks that encompass transparency, accountability, and environmental justice. Results reveal significant mediation effects of innovation dynamics, dynamic capabilities, and ethical considerations, while environmental context negatively moderates innovation and ethical pathways. Findings suggest that overly restrictive ethical considerations can lead to implementation delays that undermine the urgency of climate action. This study proposes three solutions: (1) adaptive ethical protocols adjusting governance intensity based on climate risk severity, (2) pre-approved ethical templates reducing approval delays by 60%, and (3) stakeholder co-design processes building consensus during development. The research advances dynamic capabilities theory for AI contexts by demonstrating how AI-enabled sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring capabilities create differentiated pathways to climate performance. This study provides empirical validation of the responsible innovation framework, identifies asymmetric environmental contingencies, and offers evidence-based guidance for organisations implementing agentic AI for climate action.

Suggested Citation

  • Subhra Mondal & Nguyen Cao Thục Uyen & Subhankar Das & Vasiliki G. Vrana, 2025. "Innovation Dynamics and Ethical Considerations of Agentic Artificial Intelligence in the Transition to a Net-Zero Carbon Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-34, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8806-:d:1762270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8806/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8806/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nizar Abdulwahab Ali Al-Moaid & Senan Ghaleb Almarhdi, 2024. "Developing dynamic capabilities for successful digital transformation projects: the mediating role of change management," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Leal Filho, Walter & Wall, Tony & Rui Mucova, Serafino Afonso & Nagy, Gustavo J. & Balogun, Abdul-Lateef & Luetz, Johannes M. & Ng, Artie W. & Kovaleva, Marina & Safiul Azam, Fardous Mohammad & Alves,, 2022. "Deploying artificial intelligence for climate change adaptation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Krishna Raj Bhandari & Mikko Ranta & Jari Salo, 2022. "The resource‐based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm's embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1525-1537, May.
    4. Muhammad Khalid Anser & Muhammad Naeem & Shoukat Ali & Sajid Ali & Rubab Javid, 2025. "The relationship between artificial intelligence and environmental performance: the mediating role of external environmental factors," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. Lynn H. Kaack & Priya L. Donti & Emma Strubell & George Kamiya & Felix Creutzig & David Rolnick, 2022. "Aligning artificial intelligence with climate change mitigation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(6), pages 518-527, June.
    6. David Horan, 2019. "A New Approach to Partnerships for SDG Transformations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Nicholas Stern & Anna Valero, 2021. "Innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions," CEP Discussion Papers dp1773, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    8. Li, Yang & Chen, Meng & Cai, Zhao & Liu, Hefu, 2023. "Online-offline channel integration and innovation ambidexterity: Roles of top management team and environmental dynamism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Laurie Hughes & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Keyao Li & Mandanna Appanderanda & Mousa Ahmad Al-Bashrawi & Inyoung Chae, 2025. "AI Agents and Agentic Systems: Redefining Global it Management," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 175-185, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gubareva, Mariya & Shafiullah, Muhammad & Teplova, Tamara, 2025. "Corrigendum to “Cross-quantile risk assessment: The interplay of crude oil, artificial intelligence, clean tech, and other markets” [Energy Economics Volume 141, January 2025, 108085]," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Chen, Zhan-Ming & Xiong, Qiyang & Duan, Jiahui & Ma, Jianhong & Chen, Zhuo & Guo, Shan, 2025. "AI carbon footprint in China sets to double post-2030 carbon peaking," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Cristina Peñasco, 2025. "France's Green Horizon: Supply-Side Drivers for a Competitive Transition in Export Markets," Working papers 990, Banque de France.
    4. Xi Liu & Yugang He & Renhong Wu, 2024. "Revolutionizing Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Technologies in OECD Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Simran Gupta & Vaishali & Rahul Kumar, 2025. "Which ownership structure will sustain sustainability? An empirical examination of ESG disclosure," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 759-775, September.
    6. Hu, Lei & Song, Min & Wen, Fenghua & Zhang, Yun & Zhao, Yunning, 2025. "The impact of climate attention on risk spillover effect in energy futures markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Leonel Prieto & Md Farid Talukder, 2023. "Resilient Agility: A Necessary Condition for Employee and Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Alessio Terzi & Monika Sherwood & Aneil Singh, 2023. "European industrial policy for the green and digital revolution," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(5), pages 842-857.
    9. Cai, Cen & Li, Yijia & Tu, Yongqian, 2024. "Big data capabilities, ESG performance and corporate value," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    10. Iteke van Hille & Frank G.A. de Bakker & Julie E. Ferguson & Peter Groenewegen, 2020. "Cross-Sector Partnerships for Sustainability: How Mission-Driven Conveners Drive Change in National Coffee Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Keyan Zheng & Fagang Hu & Yaliu Yang, 2023. "Data-Driven Evaluation and Recommendations for Regional Synergy Innovation Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Oughton, Edward J., 2025. "Infrastructure sharing reduces the energy, emissions and costs of universal mobile 4G and 5G broadband," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    13. Rahman, Mahabubur & Rodríguez-Serrano, M. Ángeles & Hossain, Md. Tareq Bin, 2025. "When corporate environmentalism backfires: unpacking the double-edged effect of environmental product innovation on firm growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    14. Kolawole Anthony Fayemi, 2025. "Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Smarter Climate Policy and Strategic Government Planning," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(6), pages 1-77, November.
    15. Karim Mahran & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2026. "Navigating the Corporate Ego: Understanding the Association Between ESG Performance and Organizational Narcissistic Rhetoric," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 204(2), pages 437-456, March.
    16. Jun Liu & Hengxu Shen & Junwei Chen & Xin Jiang & Abdul Waheed Siyal, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and Carbon Emissions: Mediating Role of Energy Efficiency, Factor Market Allocation and Industrial Structure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Seray Ergene & Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee & Erim Ergene, 2024. "Environmental Racism and Climate (In)Justice in the Anthropocene: Addressing the Silences and Erasures in Management and Organization Studies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(4), pages 785-800, September.
    18. Radebe, Nomkhosi & Chipangamate, Nelson, 2024. "Mining industry risks, and future critical minerals and metals supply chain resilience in emerging markets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Katinka Holtsmark & Katinka Kristine Holtsmark, 2024. "Can Revenue Recycling Kill Green Technology?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11510, CESifo.
    20. Tulin Dzhengiz, 2020. "A Literature Review of Inter-Organizational Sustainability Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-52, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8806-:d:1762270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.