IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8793-d1762164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Customer Perceptions of Business Model Innovation in Family Economic Groups: Evidence from Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Belén Tulcanaza-Prieto

    (Grupo de Investigación Negocios, Economía, Organizaciones, y Sociedad (NEOS), Escuela de Negocios, Universidad de Las Américas (UDLA), Quito 170124, Ecuador)

  • Alexandra Cortez-Ordoñez

    (ViRVIG Group, Department of Computer Science, Universidad Politécnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Jairo Rivera

    (Área Académica de Gestión, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Quito 170525, Ecuador)

  • Chang Won Lee

    (School of Business, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of customers’ perception of business model innovation (BMI) and its impact on customer satisfaction (CS), customer loyalty (CL), and firm sustainability (FS) within Ecuadorian family economic groups (EFEGs). It also examines the moderating role of perceived BMI in the relationships between CS, CL, and FS. Data were collected through an online survey yielding 342 valid responses, using a structured instrument that included socio-demographic variables, perceived EFEG characteristics, and nine validated constructs. Reliability and validity were corroborated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, while structural equation modeling (SEM) and multiple regression analyses were employed to test the proposed relationships. The results reveal that socially responsible consumption (SRC), technological/digital customer skills (TCS), value creation innovativeness (VCrI), value proposition innovativeness (VPI), and value capture innovativeness (VCI) significantly influence customers’ perception of BMI. In turn, BMI positively influences CS, CL, and FS, and moderates the relationships between CS and FS, and CL and FS, though it does not significantly moderate the CS–CL relationship. These findings are consistent with previous research on European family firms, emphasizing the relevance of innovation capabilities, entrepreneurial orientation, and socioemotional wealth in enhancing adaptability and performance in family-owned businesses. This study contributes novel empirical evidence on BMI in the context of an emerging economy dominated by family firms. It underscores BMI as a dynamic capability crucial for fostering customer engagement, improving competitiveness, and ensuring long-term sustainability. Managerial implications suggest that EFEG managers should prioritize digital integration, service innovation, and transparency to strengthen customer trust and loyalty. Future research should broaden the scope to include other Latin American contexts, integrate internal organizational perspectives, and explore intergenerational dynamics and digital transformation processes to deepen understanding of BMI in family business ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Belén Tulcanaza-Prieto & Alexandra Cortez-Ordoñez & Jairo Rivera & Chang Won Lee, 2025. "Exploring Customer Perceptions of Business Model Innovation in Family Economic Groups: Evidence from Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8793-:d:1762164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8793/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8793/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Satish Nambisan, 2017. "Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(6), pages 1029-1055, November.
    2. Kannan, P.K. & Li, Hongshuang “Alice”, 2017. "Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 22-45.
    3. Keiningham, Timothy & Aksoy, Lerzan & Bruce, Helen L. & Cadet, Fabienne & Clennell, Natasha & Hodgkinson, Ian R. & Kearney, Treasa, 2020. "Customer experience driven business model innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 431-440.
    4. Ovidiu-Ioan Moisescu & Oana-Adriana Gică, 2020. "The Impact of Environmental and Social Responsibility on Customer Loyalty: A Multigroup Analysis among Generations X and Y," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Buchanan, Robin W. T. & Gillies, Crawford S., 1990. "Value managed relationships: The key to customer retention and profitability," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 523-526, December.
    6. Arzubiaga, Unai & Diaz-Moriana, Vanessa & Bauweraerts, Jonathan & Escobar, Octavio, 2021. "Big data in family firms: A socioemotional wealth perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 344-352.
    7. Vinit Parida & David Sjödin & Wiebke Reim, 2019. "Reviewing Literature on Digitalization, Business Model Innovation, and Sustainable Industry: Past Achievements and Future Promises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Ana Belén Tulcanaza-Prieto & Manuel Eugenio Morocho-Cayamcela, 2021. "The Evolution and Takeoff of the Ecuadorian Economic Groups," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Tarun Khanna & Yishay Yafeh, 2007. "Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Paragons or Parasites?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(2), pages 331-372, June.
    10. Baoliang Hu & Wei Huang & Shuai Yan & Guang Liu & Tao Zhang, 2020. "Business Model Design and Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Customer Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    11. de Reuver, Mark & Sørensen, Carsten & Basole, Rahul C., 2018. "The digital platform: a research agenda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 80669, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Cozzolino, Alessio & Corbo, Leonardo & Aversa, Paolo, 2021. "Digital platform-based ecosystems: The evolution of collaboration and competition between incumbent producers and entrant platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 385-400.
    13. Tobias Hahn & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss & Frank Figge, 2015. "Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 297-316, March.
    14. Carla Curado & António Mota, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review on Sustainability in Family Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Claessens, Stijn & Djankov, Simeon & Lang, Larry H. P., 2000. "The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1-2), pages 81-112.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guangping Xu & Guangyuan Hou & Jinshan Zhang, 2022. "Digital Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Digital Capability Perspective through Digital Innovation Orientation for Social and Environmental Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Jongmoo Jay Choi & Hoje Jo & Jimi Kim & Moo Sung Kim, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 931-954, December.
    3. Muhammad Sajjad Hussain & Muhammad Muhaizam Bin Musa Musa & Abdelnaser Omran Ali, 2018. "The Impact of Private Ownership Structure on Risk Taking by Pakistani Banks: An Empirical Study AbstractThe financial crisis of 2007-09 was converted the focus of researchers and regulators toward ban," Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 6(3), pages :325-337, September.
    4. Katsuhiko Muramiya & Tomomi Takada, 2015. "Cross-Shareholdings and Information Environment," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 15-20, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    5. World Bank, 2023. "Digital Conglomerates in East Asia," World Bank Publications - Reports 40641, The World Bank Group.
    6. Chimenti, Gianluca & Hagberg, Johan & Araujo, Luis, 2025. "Platforms, infrastructures and the Futures of market society," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    7. Chenglei Xu & Shuxin Zhu & Boru Yang & Bin Miao & Yi Duan, 2023. "A Review of Policy Framework Research on Promoting Sustainable Transformation of Digital Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    8. Gala, Kaushik & Schwab, Andreas & Mueller, Brandon A., 2024. "Star entrepreneurs on digital platforms: Heavy-tailed performance distributions and their generative mechanisms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1).
    9. Heitor Almeida & Sang Yong Park & Marti Subrahmanyam & Daniel Wolfenzon, 2009. "The Structure and Formation of Business Groups: Evidence from Korean Chaebols," NBER Working Papers 14983, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Ararat, Melsa & Claessens, Stijn & Yurtoglu, B. Burcin, 2021. "Corporate governance in emerging markets: A selective review and an agenda for future research," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    11. Randall Morck, 2011. "Finance and Governance in Developing Economies," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 375-406, December.
    12. Richard W. Carney & Travers Barclay Child, 2015. "Business Networks and Crisis Performance: Professional, Political, and Family Ties," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-135/V, Tinbergen Institute, revised 20 Feb 2015.
    13. Hearn, Bruce, 2014. "The impact of institutions, ownership structure, business angels, venture capital and lead managers on IPO firm underpricing across North Africa," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 19-42.
    14. Ilhang Shin & Sorah Park & Seong Pyo Cho & Seungho Choi, 2020. "The effect of labor unions on innovation and market valuation in business group affiliations: new evidence from South Korea," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(2), pages 239-270, April.
    15. Roy Kouwenberg & Pipat Thontirawong, 2016. "Group affiliation and earnings management of Asian IPO issuers," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 897-917, November.
    16. Banerjee, Pradip & Dhole, Sandip & Mishra, Sagarika, 2023. "Operating performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: Is there a business group advantage?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Espenlaub, Susanne & Khurshed, Arif & Sitthipongpanich, Thitima, 2012. "Bank connections, corporate investment and crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1336-1353.
    18. Kuo-Pin Yang & Gavin M. Schwarz, 2016. "A Multilevel Analysis of the Performance Implications of Excess Control in Business Groups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1219-1236, October.
    19. Lerch, Christian M. & Horvat, Djerdj & Jasny, Johannes, 2024. "When manufacturers turn into digital platform providers: A transformation model to understand the platformization pathway," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    20. Bowo Setiyono & Amine Tarazi, 2018. "Does Diversity of Bank Board Members Affect Performance and Risk? Evidence from an Emerging Market," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Belén Díaz Díaz & Samuel O. Idowu & Philip Molyneux (ed.), Corporate Governance in Banking and Investor Protection, chapter 0, pages 185-218, Springer.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8793-:d:1762164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.