IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8735-d1760713.html

Assessing the Impact of Workplace Incivility and Organizational Support on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Work Behavior in Service Industry: A Moderated Mediation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Wamba Syntiche Dongmo

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Cyprus International University, Haspolat, via Mersin 10, Nicosia 99258, Turkey)

  • Cem Tanova

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Cyprus International University, Haspolat, via Mersin 10, Nicosia 99258, Turkey)

Abstract

In Cameroon’s service industry, where sustainability is increasingly crucial, this study examines how workplace incivility and organizational support influence employees’ pro-environmental work behavior, applying the Conservation of Resources and Self-Determination Theories. A moderated mediation model was tested, with emotional exhaustion and mindfulness as mediators and psychological capital as a moderator. Data from 280 service industry employees were analyzed using SPSS 24 and SmartPLS 4. Workplace incivility reduces pro-environmental behavior through emotional exhaustion, but shows no significant link with mindfulness. Organizational support enhances pro-environmental behavior and reduces exhaustion, though it does not influence mindfulness. Psychological capital does not mitigate the negative impact of incivility on pro-environmental behavior and its positive impact on exhaustion. These results highlight the critical role of supportive workplaces in fostering sustainable behaviors and the buffering role of psychological capital. This study advances the theoretical understanding of employee behavior in service settings and offers practical insights for managers in banking and insurance to promote sustainability by reducing workplace incivility and enhancing support systems, particularly in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Wamba Syntiche Dongmo & Cem Tanova, 2025. "Assessing the Impact of Workplace Incivility and Organizational Support on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Work Behavior in Service Industry: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8735-:d:1760713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhenglin Zhang & Haiqing Shi & Taiwen Feng, 2022. "Why Good Employees Do Bad Things: The Link between Pro-Environmental Behavior and Workplace Deviance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Yijing Li & Yannan Li, 2025. "Enhancing Pro-Environmental Behavior Through Green HRM: Mediating Roles of Green Mindfulness and Knowledge Sharing for Sustainable Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Boshra H. Namin & Torvald Øgaard & Jo Røislien, 2021. "Workplace Incivility and Turnover Intention in Organizations: A Meta-Analytic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Bandura, Albert, 1991. "Social cognitive theory of self-regulation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 248-287, December.
    5. David M. Sluss & Blake E. Ashforth, 2008. "How Relational and Organizational Identification Converge: Processes and Conditions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(6), pages 807-823, December.
    6. Elham Anasori & Steven. W. Bayighomog & Cem Tanova, 2020. "Workplace bullying, psychological distress, resilience, mindfulness, and emotional exhaustion," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1-2), pages 65-89, January.
    7. Hewawasam Puwakpitiyage Rasika Priyankara & Fan Luo & Amer Saeed & Saviour Ayertey Nubuor & Mahabaduge Prasad Fernando Jayasuriya, 2018. "How Does Leader’s Support for Environment Promote Organizational Citizenship Behaviour for Environment? A Multi-Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Hae-Ryong Kim & Moonkyu Lee & Hyoung-Tark Lee & Na-Min Kim, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee–Company Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(4), pages 557-569, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walumbwa, Fred O. & Mayer, David M. & Wang, Peng & Wang, Hui & Workman, Kristina & Christensen, Amanda L., 2011. "Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader-member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 204-213, July.
    2. Byung-Jik Kim & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Tae-Hyun Kim & Se-Youn Jung, 2019. "Does a Good Firm Breed Good Organizational Citizens? The Moderating Role of Perspective Taking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Hongwei He & Weichun Zhu & Xiaoming Zheng, 2014. "Procedural Justice and Employee Engagement: Roles of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity Centrality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(4), pages 681-695, July.
    4. Kenneth De Roeck & Assâad El Akremi & Valérie Swaen, 2016. "Consistency Matters! How and When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Employees’ Organizational Identification?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(7), pages 1141-1168, November.
    5. Tran Thi Ngoc Lien, 2024. "Stakeholder Perception of Extracurricular Activities at the Tertiary Level in Vietnam," Studies in Educational Management, EUROKD, vol. 15, pages 35-59.
    6. Carlos Bazan, 2022. "Effect of the University’s Environment and Support System on Subjective Social Norms as Precursor of the Entrepreneurial Intention of Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    7. Christopher S. Tuggle & David G. Sirmon & Cameron J. Borgholthaus & Leonard Bierman & A. Erin Bass, 2022. "From Seats at the Table to Voices in the Discussion: Antecedents of Underrepresented Director Participation in Board Meetings," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1253-1283, July.
    8. Irene Chu & Mai Chi Vu, 2022. "The Nature of the Self, Self-regulation and Moral Action: Implications from the Confucian Relational Self and Buddhist Non-self," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 245-262, September.
    9. Mahabubur Rahman & M. Ángeles Rodríguez-Serrano & Mary Lambkin, 2019. "Brand equity and firm performance: the complementary role of corporate social responsibility," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(6), pages 691-704, November.
    10. Chen, Xi & Zhang, Stephen X., 2024. "Too much of two good things: The curvilinear effects of self-efficacy and market validation in new ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    11. Xu, Xiaojing & Chen, Chien-fei & Zhu, Xiaojuan & Hu, Qinran, 2018. "Promoting acceptance of direct load control programs in the United States: Financial incentive versus control option," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1278-1287.
    12. Jaeyeob Jeong & Myeonggil Choi, 2017. "The Expected Job Satisfaction Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention as Career Choice in the Cultural and Artistic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Lei Zhou & Feng Wei & Yu Kong, 2022. "Do Employee Stock Ownership Plans Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Jay A. Richards & Martin P. Johnson, 2014. "A Case for Theoretical Integration," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, May.
    15. Pedro Marques-Quinteiro & Luís Curral & Ana Passos, 2012. "Adapting The Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire to The Portuguese Context," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 108(3), pages 553-564, September.
    16. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    17. Mohammed-Aminu Sanda, 2011. "Managerial Self-efficacy and Discretionary Behavior Improving Work Environment for Small Firm Performance," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 2(6), pages 259-266.
    18. Sabrina Harris & Michael Brooks & Robin Liles & Glacia Ethridge & Quinton Boston & Kacie Blalock, 2019. "Understanding Differences between CORE and CACREP Counselors-in-Training Perceptions of Self-Efficacy," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 40-52, January.
    19. Bo Shao & Pablo Cardona & Isabel Ng & Raymond N. C. Trau, 2017. "Are prosocially motivated employees more committed to their organization? The roles of supervisors’ prosocial motivation and perceived corporate social responsibility," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 951-974, December.
    20. Shen, Chung-Hua & Wu, Meng-Wen & Chen, Ting-Hsuan & Fang, Hao, 2016. "To engage or not to engage in corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from global banking sector," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 207-225.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8735-:d:1760713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.