IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8648-d1758609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agronomic Impact and Cost Analysis of Natural Rocks and Biological Inoculants in Potato Production

Author

Listed:
  • AboBakr A. Youssef

    (Department of Biology, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo 11835, Egypt
    Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute (AGERI), Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza 12619, Egypt)

  • Amal A. Badr

    (Biotechnology Graduate Program, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

  • Walid M. Fouad

    (Department of Biology, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo 11835, Egypt
    Biotechnology Graduate Program, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

Abstract

Potato ( Solanum tuberosum ) is an important food crop. However, intensive cultivation has led to increased reliance on chemical fertilizers, raising environmental and economic concerns. One of the concerns in potato plantations is phosphorus, which often exhibits low availability due to leaching and poor use efficiency, coupled with rising fertilizer production costs. This study investigates the agronomic and economic impacts of using natural rock amendments combined with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as sustainable alternatives to chemical fertilizers on the yield and tuber quality of potato. A field experiment assessed three treatments: conventional chemical fertilizers (T1), reduced chemical fertilizers combined with PGPR ( Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus mucilaginosus , and Azotobacter ) (T2), and natural rock amendments of potassium feldspar and rock phosphate combined with PGPR (T3). Results showed that T2 and T3 demonstrated improved tuber quality compared to T1, with T3 achieving the highest starch content (314.05 mg/g FW) and reduced sugar content (102.03 mg/g FW). Furthermore, T3 improved soil quality after the growing season, showing higher phosphorus and potassium availability compared to T1. Economically, T3 reduced operating costs by 11% and achieved the highest yield (42 tons/ha). The return on investment for T3 reached approximately 79.48% (USD 3988/ha), with a 40.9% profit increase compared to T1 (USD 2460/ha) These findings confirm that integrating PGPR with natural rock fertilizers offers a cost-effective and durable alternative to conventional fertilization practices, enhancing productivity and profitability while providing significant opportunities for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and promoting long-term soil sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • AboBakr A. Youssef & Amal A. Badr & Walid M. Fouad, 2025. "Agronomic Impact and Cost Analysis of Natural Rocks and Biological Inoculants in Potato Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8648-:d:1758609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8648-:d:1758609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.