IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8646-d1758579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Objective Optimization of Window Design for Energy and Thermal Comfort in School Buildings: A Sustainable Approach for Hot-Humid Climates

Author

Listed:
  • Tian Xia

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Azlan Shah Ali

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Norhayati Mahyuddin

    (Centre for Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

Abstract

School buildings in hot-humid climates encounter considerable difficulties in balancing energy use and thermal comfort due to this environment, necessitating optimized design strategies to reduce energy consumption while enhancing occupant comfort. This study presents sustainable design strategies for educational structures in hot-humid regions, aiming to optimize energy efficiency and thermal comfort for environmental preservation and occupant welfare. The present work introduces a multi-objective optimization framework for window design in school buildings situated in hot-humid climates, targeting a balance between Energy Use Intensity (EUI) and Thermal Comfort Time Ratio (TCTR). Exploring multi-objective optimization through NSGA-II genetic algorithms, the study conducts Sobol sensitivity analysis for parameter assessment and applies Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) for effective model validation, identifying optimal window configurations that reduce energy consumption while enhancing thermal comfort. It finds that the Window-to-Wall Ratio (WWR) and Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) are the most significant factors, with WWR and SHGC accounting for 28.1% and 23.7% of the variance in EUI and TCTR, respectively. The results reveal a non-linear trade-off between the objectives, with the Balanced Solution offering a practical compromise: a 6.7% decrease in energy use and a 14.3% enhancement in thermal comfort. The study examined various ranges of window parameters, including WWR (0.1–0.50), SC (0.20–0.80), K (1.0–2.5 W·m −2 ·K −1 ), SHGC (0.1–0.4), Shading width (0.3–2.0 m), and Shading angle (0°–90°). The recommended compromise, known as the Balanced Solution, suggests optimal values as follows: WWR = 0.40, SC = 0.30, SHGC = 0.40, K = 1.2 W·m −2 ·K −1 , Shading width = 1.22 m, and Shading angle = 28°. The GPR model exhibited high predictive precision, with R 2 values of 0.91 for EUI and 0.95 for TCTR, underscoring the framework’s effectiveness. This research offers actionable insights for designing energy-efficient and comfortable school buildings in hot-humid climates, enriching sustainable architectural design knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian Xia & Azlan Shah Ali & Norhayati Mahyuddin, 2025. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Window Design for Energy and Thermal Comfort in School Buildings: A Sustainable Approach for Hot-Humid Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-34, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8646-:d:1758579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8646-:d:1758579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.