IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8637-d1758332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinant Factors of the Subjective Perception of Educational Projects with European Funding

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Claudia Grigoroiu

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500068 Brașov, Romania)

  • Cristina Țurcanu

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500068 Brașov, Romania)

  • Cristinel Petrișor Constantin

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500068 Brașov, Romania)

  • Alina Simona Tecău

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500068 Brașov, Romania)

  • Ileana Tache

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500068 Brașov, Romania)

Abstract

This paper investigates the subjective value perceived by teachers, defined as their overall appreciation of EU-funded educational projects in terms of usefulness, relevance, and impact on education, regarding projects implemented in Romanian schools during the period 2014–2022. The main factors influencing the perceived value were identified through a quantitative approach using a questionnaire-based survey, administered to a sample of 1050 teachers from various regions of the country. The results reveal that improvements achieved in various aspects of the educational environment quality have a positive influence on the analyzed indicator. These improvements can be grouped into two categories of factors that act at the level of school, on the one hand, and at the level of students, on the other hand, both having a significant impact on increasing the perceived value of EU-funded educational projects. The differences between schools that benefited from such educational projects and other schools were also addressed, as well as the influence of the dominant socio-economic status of children studying in different schools on the improvement of the quality of the educational environment. The conclusions highlight the strategic role of European funding in reducing educational disparities and the need to target support to vulnerable schools. The practical and managerial implications include strengthening infrastructure, adapting methodologies, and developing staff competencies, alongside interventions aimed at improving student progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Claudia Grigoroiu & Cristina Țurcanu & Cristinel Petrișor Constantin & Alina Simona Tecău & Ileana Tache, 2025. "Determinant Factors of the Subjective Perception of Educational Projects with European Funding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-34, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8637-:d:1758332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8637/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8637/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simons, E. & Hwang, S.-A. & Fitzgerald, E.F. & Kielb, C. & Lin, S., 2010. "The impact of school building conditions on student absenteeism in upstate New York," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(9), pages 1679-1686.
    2. Hosung Sohn & Heeran Park & Haeil Jung, 2023. "The Effect of Extra School Funding on Students' Academic Achievements under a Centralized School Financing System," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, Winter.
    3. Ming Hu, 2018. "Optimal Renovation Strategies for Education Buildings—A Novel BIM–BPM–BEM Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Contreras, Dante & González, Luis & Láscar, Samuel & López, Verónica, 2022. "Negative teacher–student and student–student relationships are associated with school dropout: Evidence from a large-scale longitudinal study in Chile," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Maykel Verkuyten & Jochem Thijs, 2002. "School Satisfaction of Elementary School Children: The Role of Performance, Peer Relations, Ethnicity and Gender," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 203-228, August.
    6. Joydeep Roy, 2011. "Impact of School Finance Reform on Resource Equalization and Academic Performance: Evidence from Michigan," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 6(2), pages 137-167, April.
    7. Pablo Delgado-Galindo & Jesús García-Jiménez & Juan-Jesús Torres-Gordillo & Javier Rodríguez-Santero, 2025. "School Climate and Academic Performance: Key Factors for Sustainable Education in High-Efficacy Schools and Low-Efficacy Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-17, July.
    8. NGUYEN Thi To Khuyen & NGUYEN Van Bien & Pei-Ling Lin & Jing Lin & Chun-Yen Chang, 2020. "Measuring Teachers’ Perceptions to Sustain STEM Education Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Julien Lafortune & Jesse Rothstein & Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach, 2018. "School Finance Reform and the Distribution of Student Achievement," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, April.
    10. Joshua Hyman, 2017. "Does Money Matter in the Long Run? Effects of School Spending on Educational Attainment," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 256-280, November.
    11. Tiberiu Catalina & Stefan Alexandru Ghita & Lelia Letiția Popescu & Răzvan Popescu, 2022. "Survey and Measurements of Indoor Environmental Quality in Urban/Rural Schools Located in Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Maria-Floriana Popescu & Bogdan-Cristian Chiripuci & Andreea Orîndaru & Marius Constantin & Albert Scrieciu, 2020. "Fostering Sustainable Development through Shifting Toward Rural Areas and Digitalization—The Case of Romanian Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    13. C. Kirabo Jackson & Cora Wigger & Heyu Xiong, 2021. "Do School Spending Cuts Matter? Evidence from the Great Recession," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 304-335, May.
    14. Sara Manca & Veronica Cerina & Valentina Tobia & Simona Sacchi & Ferdinando Fornara, 2020. "The Effect of School Design on Users’ Responses: A Systematic Review (2008–2017)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-37, April.
    15. Aibao Zhou & Xiangli Guan & Md Zahir Ahmed & Oli Ahmed & Mary C. Jobe & Fatema Akhter Hiramoni, 2021. "An Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Study Engagement and Its Enlightenment to Education: Role of Perceptions of School Climate and Self-Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mar√≠a Orduz, 2022. "Effect of educational spending on academic performance under different institutional arrangements," Documentos CEDE 20224, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    2. Eric Brunner & Joshua Hyman & Andrew Ju, 2020. "School Finance Reforms, Teachers' Unions, and the Allocation of School Resources," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(3), pages 473-489, July.
    3. Josh B. McGee, 2023. "Yes, money matters, but the details can make all the difference," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 1125-1132, September.
    4. Danielle V. Handel & Eric A. Hanushek, 2024. "Contexts of Convenience: Generalizing from Published Evaluations of School Finance Policies," Evaluation Review, , vol. 48(3), pages 461-494, June.
    5. Bass, Brittany, 2021. "The effect of technology funding on school-level student proficiency," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Acton, Riley & Orr, Cody & Rogers, Salem, 2023. "Returns to School Spending in Rural America: Evidence from Wisconsin's Sparsity Aid Program," IZA Discussion Papers 15915, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Michael D. Bates & Leslie E. Papke & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2024. "Non linear correlated random effects models with endogeneity and unbalanced panels," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(9), pages 713-732, October.
    8. Chin, Mark J. & Shi, Lena, 2025. "Average and heterogeneous effects of political party on state education finance and outcomes: Regression discontinuity evidence across U.S. election cycles," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. C. Kirabo Jackson, 2018. "Does School Spending Matter? The New Literature on an Old Question," NBER Working Papers 25368, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Kreisman, Daniel & Steinberg, Matthew P., 2019. "The effect of increased funding on student achievement: Evidence from Texas's small district adjustment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 118-141.
    11. Sungoh Kwon, 2017. "Does Public School Spending Raise Intergenerational Mobility?: Evidence from U.S. School Finance Reforms," Working papers 2017-06, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    12. Brunner, Eric & Hoen, Ben & Hyman, Joshua, 2022. "School district revenue shocks, resource allocations, and student achievement: Evidence from the universe of U.S. wind energy installations," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    13. Cordis, Adriana S. & Muzatko, Steven, 2021. "Higher education spending and CPA exam performance," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    14. Katharine L. Bradbury, 2020. "The Roles of State Aid and Local Conditions in Elementary School Test-Score Gaps," Working Papers 21-2, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    15. Erdal Asker & Eric J. Brunner & Stephen L. Ross, 2022. "The Impact of School Spending on Civic Engagement: Evidence from School Finance Reforms," Working papers 2022-16, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    16. Biasi, Barbara & Lafortune, Julien & Schönholzer, David, 2024. "What Works and For Whom? Effectiveness and Efficiency of School Capital Investments Across The U.S," CEPR Discussion Papers 18745, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Biedermann, Matthias & Häner, Melanie & Schaltegger, Christoph A., 2024. "More is not always better. Effect of educational expenditures on education quality and social mobility in Switzerland," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Candelaria, Christopher A. & Fazlul, Ishtiaque & Koedel, Cory & Shores, Kenneth A., 2024. "Weighting for progressivity? An analysis of implicit tradeoffs associated with weighted student funding in Tennessee," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Caterina Pavese & Enrico Rubolino, 2022. "Austerity Harmed Student Achievement," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 22.09, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    20. Stephen Gibbons & Sandra McNally & Martina Viarengo, 2018. "Does Additional Spending Help Urban Schools? An Evaluation Using Boundary Discontinuities," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(5), pages 1618-1668.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8637-:d:1758332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.