Author
Listed:
- Xin Xi
(College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)
- Xiaona Shi
(College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
Research Center for Human Geography of Tibetan Plateau and Its Eastern Slope, Chengdu 610059, China)
- Tielin Wang
(Chengdu Planning Research and Application Technology Center, Chengdu 610042, China)
- Xinyi Wang
(College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)
- Ke Huang
(Sichuan Zhongjia Wanxing Architectural Design & Planning Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610036, China)
Abstract
Rural settlement systems in core ecological barrier zones face heightened geological disaster risks, making vulnerability assessment crucial for enhancing resilience and sustainable development. This study examines Maoxian County, a typical high-risk disaster zone in western Sichuan, using the Vulnerability Scoping Diagram (VSD) model framework. The framework integrates exposure, sensitivity, and resilience dimensions to construct a comprehensive vulnerability assessment index system. Using the CRITIC-AHP combined weighting method and the Spatially Explicit Vulnerability Model, this research evaluates spatial differentiation patterns of geological disaster vulnerability in rural settlement systems at the township level to identify dominant vulnerability types and their underlying mechanisms. Results reveal significant spatial differentiation in vulnerability across the study area with distinct patterns: exposure exhibits an “east-high, west-low” distribution, sensitivity shows a “northwest-high, southeast-low” pattern, and resilience follows a “southeast-high, northwest-low” distribution. Overall vulnerability presents a “northwest–southeast high, central low” spatial configuration. The dominant factor method identified eight vulnerability types in rural settlements, including strong comprehensive vulnerability and exposure-sensitivity vulnerability. Based on the principle of “ecological security anchoring, systemic hierarchical regulation, chain-based risk interruption, and spatial precision adaptation,” tailored resilience enhancement strategies were proposed for each vulnerability type. This study provides a scientific basis for disaster risk prevention and control, land use optimization, and sustainable development in rural settlement systems.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8629-:d:1758276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.