IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8562-d1757043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Removal of Heavy Metals from Galvanic Industry Wastewater: A Review of Different Possible Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Kowalik-Klimczak

    (Łukasiewicz Research Network–Institute for Sustainable Technologies, Pułaskiego St. 6/10, 26-600 Radom, Poland)

Abstract

The galvanic industry requires considerable amounts of water and produces significant quantities of wastewater. Two types of wastewater are created in the processes of the galvanic application of metal coatings: used galvanic baths and wastewater generated while rinsing coated elements. The composition and amount of wastewater depend on the type of process, the plant’s operational system, and the quantity of water utilised to rinse the coated elements. In this article, the possibilities of using different techniques, such as chemical precipitation, coagulation and flocculation, ion exchange, adsorption, and membrane filtration, to remove heavy metals from galvanic wastewater were analysed and assessed. It was determined that the use of physicochemical methods (i.e., chemical precipitation, coagulation, and flocculation) to remove heavy metals has significant disadvantages, including operational costs connected with the purchase of chemical reagents and the emergence of metal complexes requiring management/utilisation. On the other hand, the processes of ion exchange and adsorption can be used only for wastewater characterised by a low heavy metal concentration, with organic matter preliminarily removed. In addition, waste polluted with heavy metals in the form of used regenerative baths and used sorbents is generated during these processes. In turn, the advanced techniques of membrane filtration allow for the removal of different types of organic pollutants and heavy metals. The processes of membrane wastewater treatment exhibit a range of advantages compared to traditional technologies, including the complete, environmentally friendly removal of permanent organic pollution, easy integration into conventional technologies, a limited amount of residue, a high level of separation, and a shorter process time. The efficiency of membrane wastewater treatment depends on many parameters, including, most of all, the composition, pH, and type of membrane, as well as process conditions. The possibility of using new types of membranes to remove heavy metals from spent galvanic baths was analysed, and the possibility of using the processes in wastewater treatment systems according to the circular economy model was assessed. The assessment of the efficiency of heavy metal removal in hybrid systems combining specific individual processes and the development of state-of-the-art material solutions to realise these processes may be an interesting direction of research in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Kowalik-Klimczak, 2025. "Removal of Heavy Metals from Galvanic Industry Wastewater: A Review of Different Possible Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8562-:d:1757043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8562/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8562/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marzena Smol & Joanna Duda & Agnieszka Czaplicka-Kotas & Dominika Szołdrowska, 2020. "Transformation towards Circular Economy (CE) in Municipal Waste Management System: Model Solutions for Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Ali Hashim Mohammed & Sufyan Mohammed Shartooh & Mohamed Trigui, 2025. "Biosorption and Isotherm Modeling of Heavy Metals Using Phragmites australis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Zarifeh Raji & Ahasanul Karim & Antoine Karam & Seddik Khalloufi, 2023. "Adsorption of Heavy Metals: Mechanisms, Kinetics, and Applications of Various Adsorbents in Wastewater Remediation—A Review," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-31, September.
    4. Ayşe Ulusoy & Atılgan Atılgan & Roman Rolbiecki & Barbara Jagosz & Stanisław Rolbiecki, 2024. "Innovative Approaches for Sustainable Wastewater Resource Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Javier I. Ordóñez & Sonia Cortés & Pablo Maluenda & Ignacio Soto, 2023. "Biosorption of Heavy Metals with Algae: Critical Review of Its Application in Real Effluents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marzena Smol, 2023. "Inventory and Comparison of Performance Indicators in Circular Economy Roadmaps of the European Countries," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 557-584, March.
    2. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Suhaiza Zailani & Yasanur Kayikci & John G. Keogh, 2023. "Examining Knowledge Diffusion in the Circular Economy Domain: a Main Path Analysis," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 125-166, March.
    3. Antonio Gattuso & Alessandra De Bruno & Amalia Piscopo & Simone Santacaterina & Maria Josè Frutos & Marco Poiana, 2024. "Bergamot Pomace Flour: From Byproduct to Bioactive Ingredient for Pasta Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-13, September.
    4. G. Perkoulidis & A. Malamakis & G. Banias & N. Moussiopoulos, 2022. "Development of a Methodological Framework for the Evaluation of the Material and Energy Recovery Potential of Municipal Solid Waste Management: Implementation in Five Greek Regions," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 313-326, March.
    5. Agata Mlonka-Mędrala, 2023. "Recent Findings on Fly Ash-Derived Zeolites Synthesis and Utilization According to the Circular Economy Concept," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Amir, Nizar & Hussin, Farihahusnah & Aroua, Mohamed Kheireddine & Gozan, Misri, 2025. "Exploring seaweed as a sustainable solution for carbon dioxide adsorption: Trends, opportunities, and future research prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Karolina Gwarda & Magdalena Klopott, 2021. "Selective Bio-Waste Collection System in Gdynia from the Perspective of Residents of Multi-Family Households," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4 - Part ), pages 590-600.
    8. Rocío González-Sánchez & Sara Alonso-Muñoz & María Sonia Medina-Salgado, 2023. "Circularity in waste management: a research proposal to achieve the 2030 Agenda," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1520-1540, September.
    9. Năstase Luiza Loredana, 2023. "Circularity and Municipal Waste in Romania An Evaluation between 2011 and 2021," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1509-1518, July.
    10. Liliana Topliceanu & Petru Gabriel Puiu & Catalin Drob & Vlad Vasile Topliceanu, 2022. "Analysis Regarding the Implementation of the Circular Economy in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, December.
    11. Patrycja Wojciechowska & Karolina Wiszumirska, 2022. "Sustainable Communication in the B2C Market—The Impact of Packaging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Olga Lingaitienė & Aurelija Burinskienė & Vida Davidavičienė, 2022. "Case Study of Municipal Waste and Its Reliance on Reverse Logistics in European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, February.
    13. Marzena Smol & Renata Koneczna, 2021. "Economic Indicators in Water and Wastewater Sector Contributing to a Circular Economy (CE)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Elżbieta Antczak, 2020. "Regionally Divergent Patterns in Factors Affecting Municipal Waste Production: The Polish Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.
    15. Simona Andreea Apostu & Iza Gigauri & Mirela Panait & Pedro A. Martín-Cervantes, 2023. "Is Europe on the Way to Sustainable Development? Compatibility of Green Environment, Economic Growth, and Circular Economy Issues," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Tomasz Jedynak & Krzysztof Wąsowicz, 2021. "The Relationship between Efficiency and Quality of Municipally Owned Corporations: Evidence from Local Public Transport and Waste Management in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-30, August.
    17. Piotr Kordel & Radosław Wolniak, 2021. "Technology Entrepreneurship and the Performance of Enterprises in the Conditions of Covid-19 Pandemic: The Fuzzy Set Analysis of Waste to Energy Enterprises in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    18. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:590-600 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Marzena Smol & Christian Adam & Stefan Anton Kugler, 2020. "Thermochemical Treatment of Sewage Sludge Ash (SSA)—Potential and Perspective in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Przemysław Rajca & Andrzej Skibiński & Anna Biniek-Poskart & Monika Zajemska, 2022. "Review of Selected Determinants Affecting Use of Municipal Waste for Energy Purposes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    21. Ishmael Onungwe & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Ian Jefferson, 2023. "Transition and Implementation of Circular Economy in Municipal Solid Waste Management System in Nigeria: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-26, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8562-:d:1757043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.