IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8561-d1757017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Review of Environmental Education Teaching Practices in Schools: Trends and Gaps (2015–2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Xinqi Zhang

    (Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto 603-8047, Japan)

  • Wanseop Jung

    (Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan)

  • Misuzu Asari

    (Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto 603-8047, Japan)

Abstract

Environmental education plays a vital role in cultivating environmentally responsible citizens. Although teachers are central to environmental education, their pedagogical practices remain under-researched. Thus, this study targeted to systematically review empirical research on environmental education teaching practices to synthesize findings and identify gaps. 2273 papers between 2015 and 2024 from Teacher Reference Center, ERIC, and GreenFILE were filtered to cover studies focused on environmental education teaching practices by teachers under formal education. To interpret trends of discoveries, we propose an expanded Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge framework—TPAC+E—by incorporating environmental knowledge alongside existing dimensions. Majority of 111 peer-reviewed articles employed case study designs and interviews, with an increasing emphasis on digital technologies in the post-COVID era. Common teaching practices identified include cross-disciplinary integration, outdoor learning, participatory approaches, and the promotion of critical thinking and empathy. However, widespread reliance on textbooks and teacher-centered instruction persists. The review also highlights significant research gaps in primary education and in underrepresented regions such as the Global South and East Asia. We advocate for more interdisciplinary and context-specific approaches, along with enhanced support for teacher training and curriculum development. This review offers both practical and conceptual insights to advance equitable and effective environmental education worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinqi Zhang & Wanseop Jung & Misuzu Asari, 2025. "Systematic Review of Environmental Education Teaching Practices in Schools: Trends and Gaps (2015–2024)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8561-:d:1757017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8561/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8561/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8561-:d:1757017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.