Author
Listed:
- Yankun Liu
(College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Security and Water Disasters Prevention, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Mingliang Du
(College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Security and Water Disasters Prevention, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Xiaofei Ma
(College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Security and Water Disasters Prevention, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Shuting Hu
(College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Security and Water Disasters Prevention, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Ziyun Tuo
(College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Security and Water Disasters Prevention, Urumqi 830052, China)
Abstract
Groundwater level (GWL) prediction in arid regions faces two fundamental challenges in conventional numerical modeling: (i) irreducible parameter uncertainty, which systematically reduces predictive accuracy; (ii) oversimplification of nonlinear process interactions, which leads to error propagation. Although machine learning (ML) methods demonstrate strong nonlinear mapping capabilities, their standalone applications often encounter prediction bias and face the accuracy–generalization trade-off. This study proposes a hybrid TCN–Transformer–LSTM (TTL) model designed to address three key challenges in groundwater prediction: high-frequency fluctuations, medium-range dependencies, and long-term memory effects. The TTL framework integrates TCN layers for short-term features, Transformer blocks to model cross-temporal dependencies, and LSTM to preserve long-term memory, with residual connections facilitating hierarchical feature fusion. The results indicate that (1) at the monthly scale, TTL reduced RMSE by 20.7% ( p < 0.01) and increased R 2 by 0.15 compared with the Groundwater Modeling System (GMS); (2) during abrupt hydrological events, TTL achieved superior performance (R 2 = 0.96–0.98, MAE < 0.6 m); (3) PCA revealed site-specific responses, corroborating the adaptability and interpretability of TTL; (4) Grad-CAM analysis demonstrated that the model captures physically interpretable attention mechanisms—particularly evapotranspiration and rainfall—thereby providing clear cause–effect explanations and enhancing transparency beyond black-box models. This transferable framework supports groundwater forecasting, risk warning, and practical deployment in arid regions, thereby contributing to sustainable water resource management.
Suggested Citation
Yankun Liu & Mingliang Du & Xiaofei Ma & Shuting Hu & Ziyun Tuo, 2025.
"Groundwater Level Prediction Using a Hybrid TCN–Transformer–LSTM Model and Multi-Source Data Fusion: A Case Study of the Kuitun River Basin, Xinjiang,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-17, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8544-:d:1756484
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8544-:d:1756484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.