IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8509-d1755269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Through Feed Reformulation: A Multi-Objective Life Cycle Assessment Optimisation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Somindu Wachong Kum

    (Department for Sustainable Food Process (DiSTAS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy)

  • Diego Voccia

    (Department for Sustainable Food Process (DiSTAS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy)

  • Maximilian Grimm

    (Department for Sustainable Food Process (DiSTAS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy)

  • Federico Froldi

    (Department of Animal Science, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Food and Nutrition (DiANA), Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy)

  • Nicoleta Alina Suciu

    (Department for Sustainable Food Process (DiSTAS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy)

  • Lucrezia Lamastra

    (Department for Sustainable Food Process (DiSTAS), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy)

Abstract

The pursuit of alternative ingredients with improved environmental sustainability, nutritive value, and cost efficiency is crucial for modern pork production systems. Replacing soybean meals has the potential to reduce environmental impacts. This study proposes a substitution framework in which alternative ingredients are introduced to replace a growing proportion of soybean meals based on net energy equivalence. Additionally, an optimisation framework has been proposed that simultaneously addresses multiple objectives, including cost, feed weight, environmental impacts, and essential nutritional requirements. Eighteen feed mixes were obtained by introducing alternative ingredients selected from an extensive, if not systematic, literature review. Therefore, black soldier fly meal (BSF), bakery by-product (BP), and pea (P) have been introduced in feed mixes, and feed mixes were evaluated across ten environmental impact categories via a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach (ISO 14040-44), with two different functional units: 1 kg of feed mix and 1 kg of pig meat at the slaughterhouse. To assess the robustness of the optimised feed mixes under uncertainty, a cost and climate change sensitivity analysis was conducted. The results demonstrated that the introduction of BSF increased costs and environmental impacts at the single-score level (by 280% and 118%, respectively), with differences at the single-impact category level. In contrast, BP and P emerged as the most effective solutions in the substitution and optimisation approaches, respectively. BP contributed to a reduction in environmental impacts of up to 9% in optimised diets, while P achieved economic cost savings of up to 28% compared to the original diet. These findings highlighted the need to strike a balance between environmental benefits and financial viability, underscoring the importance of policy support and market incentives to make sustainable practices more accessible.

Suggested Citation

  • Somindu Wachong Kum & Diego Voccia & Maximilian Grimm & Federico Froldi & Nicoleta Alina Suciu & Lucrezia Lamastra, 2025. "Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Through Feed Reformulation: A Multi-Objective Life Cycle Assessment Optimisation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8509-:d:1755269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8509/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8509/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajeev Ravindran & Sybrandus Koopmans & Johan P. M. Sanders & Helena McMahon & James Gaffey, 2021. "Production of Green Biorefinery Protein Concentrate Derived from Perennial Ryegrass as an Alternative Feed for Pigs," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Tanja Stahn & Regina Storandt & Sandra Grebenteuch & Sascha Rohn & Detlef May & Claudia Dolsdorf & Daniel Pleissner, 2023. "Utilization of Brewer’s Spent Grains and Agricultural Residues in Pig Feed Formation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-11, September.
    3. Sotiris I. Patsios & Anna Dedousi & Evangelia Ν. Sossidou & Antonios Zdragas, 2020. "Sustainable Animal Feed Protein through the Cultivation of YARROWIA Lipolytica on Agro-Industrial Wastes and by-Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Apostolos Malamakis & Sotiris I. Patsios & Lefteris Melas & Anna Dedousi & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Konstantinos Vamvakas & Nikos Tsotsolas & Eleni Koutsouraki & Evangelia N. Sossidou & Geo, 2023. "Demonstration of an Integrated Methodology for the Sustainable Valorisation of Bakery Former Food Products as a Pig Feed Ingredient: A Circular Bioeconomy Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Ryan Huling & Doris Lee & Wasamon Nutakul & Samuel Goh, 2024. "In Asia, alternative proteins are the new clean energy," Nature, Nature, vol. 633(8031), pages 767-769, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theresa Rubhara & James Gaffey & Gavin Hunt & Fionnuala Murphy & Kevin O’Connor & Enda Buckley & Luis Alejandro Vergara, 2024. "A Business Case for Climate Neutrality in Pasture-Based Dairy Production Systems in Ireland: Evidence from Farm Zero C," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Anne Wambui Mumbi & Helen Pittson & Frank Vriesekoop & Sebnem Kurhan, 2024. "Consumer Acceptance of Grass-Derived Ingredients in the UK: A Cross-Sectional Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Richard Orozco & María Rosa Mosquera-Losada & Javier Rodriguez & Muluken Elias Adamseged & Philipp Grundmann, 2021. "Supportive Business Environments to Develop Grass Bioeconomy in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Anna Dedousi & Sotiris I. Patsios & Maria-Zoi Kritsa & Konstantinos N. Kontogiannopoulos & Maria Ioannidou & Antonios Zdragas & Evangelia N. Sossidou, 2023. "Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Welfare and Behavior Indicators of Broilers Fed Diets Supplemented with Yarrowia lipolytica Yeast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Evangelia N. Sossidou & Georgios F. Banias & Maria Batsioula & Sofia-Afroditi Termatzidou & Panagiotis Simitzis & Sotiris I. Patsios & Donald M. Broom, 2025. "Modern Pig Production: Aspects of Animal Welfare, Sustainability and Circular Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-27, June.
    6. James Gaffey & Cathal O’Donovan & Declan Murphy & Tracey O’Connor & David Walsh & Luis Alejandro Vergara & Kwame Donkor & Lalitha Gottumukkala & Sybrandus Koopmans & Enda Buckley & Kevin O’Connor & Jo, 2023. "Synergetic Benefits for a Pig Farm and Local Bioeconomy Development from Extended Green Biorefinery Value Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Margarita Ramírez-Carmona & Leidy Rendón-Castrillón & Carlos Ocampo-López & Diego Sánchez-Osorno, 2022. "Fish Food Production Using Agro-Industrial Waste Enhanced with Spirulina sp," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8509-:d:1755269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.