IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8452-d1754128.html

The Dual-Driven Mechanism of “Value and Need” Influencing Consumers’ Continuous Purchase Behavior in Blind Box Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Linglin Zhou

    (School of Design, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, China)

  • Juncheng Mu

    (School of Fine Arts, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Chun Yang

    (School of Design, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

Abstract

This study, grounded in the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) model and incorporating a sustainable consumption perspective, investigates how the characteristics and marketing strategies of blind box products influence continuous purchase behavior through perceived value and perceived needs. Empirical evidence reveals that perceived needs are crucial for sustained purchases, with significant impacts from intellectual property (IP) characteristics and uncertainty, highlighting the core role of emotional resonance and experiential stimulation. In the context of sustainable consumption, long-term consumption is based on rational cognition of product value. Consumers form a dual cognitive understanding of “value” and “needs” regarding blind boxes, with these two acting as mediating variables linking antecedents and behaviors. Perceived sustainable value is increasingly becoming an important factor in decision-making. IP and economic attributes positively influence continuous purchases, while social attributes have an insignificant effect on perceived needs, reflecting the priority of individual needs recognition, with sustainable consumption pursuits gradually integrating. Identity recognition indirectly influences continuous purchases through perceived value and needs, validating the “identity–perception–behavior” logic, with sustainable consumption concepts also participating in this transmission. This research constructs an S-O-R framework suitable for blind boxes, enriching the model’s application in emerging industries. It reveals a dual-driving mechanism, providing a basis for understanding the rational logic of “irrational consumption” and the practice of sustainable consumption in the blind box field. It clarifies the priority of individual and group needs and the path of sustainable consumption. The conclusions offer references for blind box product design (strengthening IP, balancing attributes, integrating sustainable concepts), marketing (reasonable use of uncertainty, focusing on individuals, guiding sustainable behavior), and industry development (guiding rational consumption, promoting transformation, and fostering sustainable development).

Suggested Citation

  • Linglin Zhou & Juncheng Mu & Chun Yang, 2025. "The Dual-Driven Mechanism of “Value and Need” Influencing Consumers’ Continuous Purchase Behavior in Blind Box Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8452-:d:1754128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8452/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8452/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    2. Supranee Lisawadi & S. Ejaz Ahmed & Orawan Reangsephet & Muhammad Kashif Ali Shah, 2019. "Simultaneous estimation of Cronbach’s alpha coefficients," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(13), pages 3236-3257, July.
    3. Daniel Kahneman & Jack L. Knetsch & Richard H. Thaler, 1991. "Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 193-206, Winter.
    4. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hüttel, Alexandra & Balderjahn, Ingo & Hoffmann, Stefan, 2020. "Welfare Beyond Consumption: The Benefits of Having Less," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Ostovan, Nima & Khalili Nasr, Arash, 2022. "The manifestation of luxury value dimensions in brand engagement in self-concept," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Büyükdağ, Naci & Kitapci, Olgun, 2021. "Antecedents of consumer-brand identification in terms of belonging brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Oyedele, Adesegun & Simpson, Penny M., 2018. "Streaming apps: What consumers value," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 296-304.
    5. Yuqing Song, 2026. "The art of the gift: provenance and the endowment effect in Chinese gift artworks," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 50(1), pages 129-158, March.
    6. Nikolaus Franke & Martin Schreier & Ulrike Kaiser, 2010. "The "I Designed It Myself" Effect in Mass Customization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 125-140, January.
    7. Natee Srisomthavil & Nuttapol Assarut, 2018. "The Impact of Perceived Counterfeit Luxury Brand Proliferation on Luxury Brand Values and Patronage Intention," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 30(1), pages 41-60.
    8. Nguyen, July & Ferraro, Carla & Sands, Sean, 2020. "Similarity over difference: How congruency in customer characteristics drives service experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 592-603.
    9. Donald R. Lehmann & Jeffrey R. Parker, 2017. "Disadoption," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 36-51, June.
    10. Frank, Björn & Herbas-Torrico, Boris & Schvaneveldt, Shane J., 2021. "The AI-extended consumer: Technology, consumer, country differences in the formation of demand for AI-empowered consumer products," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Sangeeta Devanathan, 2020. "Indian Consumers’ Assessment of ‘Luxuriousness’: A Comparison of Indian and Western Luxury Brands," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 84-95, January.
    12. Wang, Nan & Xie, Wenxuan & Ali, Ahsan & Brem, Alexander & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "How do individual characteristics and social capital shape users’ continuance intentions of smart wearable products?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Hoorens, Vera & Remmers, Nicole & van de Riet, Kamieke, 1999. "Time is an amazingly variable amount of money: Endowment and ownership effects in the subjective value of working time," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 383-405, August.
    14. Daniel Villanova, 2019. "The extended self, product valuation, and the endowment effect," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 357-371, December.
    15. Eunyoung Choi & Kun Chang Lee, 2019. "Effect of Trust in Domain-Specific Information of Safety, Brand Loyalty, and Perceived Value for Cosmetics on Purchase Intentions in Mobile E-Commerce Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    16. Kokkoris, Michail D. & Hoelzl, Erik & Kamleitner, Bernadette, 2020. "Self-found, spellbound: The sense of own discovery shapes customer bonds with service venues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 303-316.
    17. Millan, Elena & Reynolds, Jonathan, 2014. "Self-construals, symbolic and hedonic preferences, and actual purchase behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 550-560.
    18. Jiyun Kang & Assemgul Bissenbina & Amy A. Faria & Jisu Jang, 2024. "Psychological ownership rather than material consumption: Can fashion firms' new subscription services become an environmentally sustainable business strategy?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1592-1609, March.
    19. Thomas M. Zellweger & Franz W. Kellermanns & James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua, 2012. "Family Control and Family Firm Valuation by Family CEOs: The Importance of Intentions for Transgenerational Control," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 851-868, June.
    20. Fritze, Martin P. & Benkenstein, Martin & Belk, Russell & Peck, Joann & Wirtz, Jochen & Claus, and Bart, 2021. "Commentaries on the Sharing Economy: Advancing New Perspectives," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(1), pages 3-19.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8452-:d:1754128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.