IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8451-d1754123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Environmental, Social, and Governance Risks? A Critical Literature Review with Practical Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Timotej Jagrič

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Maribor, Razlagova 14, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Damijan Mumel

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Maribor, Razlagova 14, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Aljaž Skaza

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Maribor, Razlagova 14, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

Abstract

The evaluation of environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks is an important yet challenging aspect of the investor decision-making process, largely attributable to the volatility of this domain. A significant proportion of these challenges arise from divergent ESG ratings, which are the consequence of absence of clarity and consistency in definitions, data, and rating methodologies. A review of the existing literature revealed that no article summarized findings related to the evaluation of ESG risks based on uniform definitions, which would help with understanding and measure development. The aim of this paper is to address ESG risks evaluation issues through a critical review of literature and deconstruction of associated issues, providing both theoretical and practical insights. The literature review began with the definition of ESG risks, which served as a foundation for the deconstruction and analysis of the ESG risk evaluation process. The findings indicate that there are numerous issues related to the evaluation process, starting with the definition of ESG, continuing through reporting and data issues, which ultimately leads to issues with the evaluation process itself. The conclusion drawn from this analysis is that usability is contingent upon the clarity of definitions and comprehension, thereby ensuring the efficacy of the ratings for investors and other stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Timotej Jagrič & Damijan Mumel & Aljaž Skaza, 2025. "Evaluation of Environmental, Social, and Governance Risks? A Critical Literature Review with Practical Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8451-:d:1754123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8451/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8451/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jong Gyu Park & Kijung Park & Heena Noh & Yong Geun Kim, 2023. "Characterization of CSR, ESG, and Corporate Citizenship through a Text Mining-Based Review of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, February.
    2. He, Feng & Duan, Lin & Lucey, Brian & Hao, Jing, 2025. "Biodiversity risk or climate risk? Which factor affects corporate ESG rating divergence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    3. Bjorg Jonsdottir & Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson & Lara Johannsdottir & Stefan Wendt, 2022. "Barriers to Using ESG Data for Investment Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Nick Bloom & Stephen Bond & John Van Reenen, 2007. "Uncertainty and Investment Dynamics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 74(2), pages 391-415.
    5. Scott R. Baker & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis, 2016. "Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 131(4), pages 1593-1636.
    6. Dorothée Baumann-Pauly & Christopher Wickert & Laura Spence & Andreas Scherer, 2013. "Organizing Corporate Social Responsibility in Small and Large Firms: Size Matters," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(4), pages 693-705, July.
    7. Hammed Afolabi & Ronita Ram & Gunnar Rimmel, 2022. "Harmonization of Sustainability Reporting Regulation: Analysis of a Contested Arena," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Teodora Maria Rusu & Antonia Odagiu & Horia Pop & Laura Paulette, 2024. "Sustainability Performance Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Liu, Xiangqiang & Peng, Yuling & Li, Qinyang & Wu, Chu-Hua, 2025. "CEO pay structure and ESG rating disagreement," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Alfonso Del Giudice & Silvia Rigamonti, 2020. "Does Audit Improve the Quality of ESG Scores? Evidence from Corporate Misconduct," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Christian Bux & Paola Geatti & Serena Sebastiani & Andrea Del Chicca & Pasquale Giungato & Angela Tarabella & Caterina Tricase, 2025. "Toward an Experimental Common Framework for Measuring Double Materiality in Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Sipiczki, Agnes, 2022. "A critical look at the ESG market," CEPS Papers 36111, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    13. Shauhrat S. Chopra & Sachini Supunsala Senadheera & Pavani Dulanja Dissanayake & Piumi Amasha Withana & Rajeev Chib & Jay Hyuk Rhee & Yong Sik Ok, 2024. "Navigating the Challenges of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: The Path to Broader Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Aaron K. Chatterji & Rodolphe Durand & David I. Levine & Samuel Touboul, 2016. "Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1597-1614, August.
    15. Mathew Kevin Bosi & Nelson Lajuni & Avnner Chardles Wellfren & Thien Sang Lim, 2022. "Sustainability Reporting through Environmental, Social, and Governance: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yong Shi & Tongsheng Yao, 2025. "ESG Rating Divergence: Existence, Driving Factors, and Impact Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Chan, Yue-Cheong & Saffar, Walid & Wei, K.C. John, 2021. "How economic policy uncertainty affects the cost of raising equity capital: Evidence from seasoned equity offerings," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Li, Xiao-Ming, 2017. "New evidence on economic policy uncertainty and equity premium," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA), pages 41-56.
    4. Philip Barrett & Mariia Bondar & Sophia Chen & Mali Chivakul & Deniz Igan, 2024. "Pricing protest: the response of financial markets to social unrest," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 28(4), pages 1419-1450.
    5. Panagiotidis, Theodore & Printzis, Panagiotis, 2020. "What is the investment loss due to uncertainty?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    6. N. Bloom, 2016. "Fluctuations in uncertainty," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 4.
    7. Azzimonti, Marina, 2019. "Does partisan conflict deter FDI inflows to the US?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 162-178.
    8. Yuan, Di & Li, Sufang & Li, Rong & Zhang, Feipeng, 2022. "Economic policy uncertainty, oil and stock markets in BRIC: Evidence from quantiles analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Wensheng Kang & Ronald A. Ratti & Joaquin Vespignani, 2020. "Impact of global uncertainty on the global economy and large developed and developing economies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(22), pages 2392-2407, May.
    10. Joëts, Marc & Mignon, Valérie & Razafindrabe, Tovonony, 2017. "Does the volatility of commodity prices reflect macroeconomic uncertainty?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 313-326.
    11. Tung Nguyen & Dimitris Petmezas & Nikolaos Karampatsas, 2023. "Does Terrorism Affect Acquisitions?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 4134-4168, July.
    12. Mathias S. Kruttli & Brigitte Roth Tran & Sumudu W. Watugala, 2025. "Pricing Poseidon: Extreme Weather Uncertainty and Firm Return Dynamics," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 80(2), pages 783-832, April.
    13. Lu, Man & Wang, Wei & Chen, Fengwen & Li, Hongmei, 2024. "Dynamic impacts of multidimensional uncertainty on the renminbi exchange rate: Insights from time-varying analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    14. Gan, Tian & Jiang, Yan & Wu, Xi & Zhang, Mingxin, 2023. "Oil price uncertainty and the cost of debt: Evidence from the Chinese bond market," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Tarek A Hassan & Stephan Hollander & Laurence van Lent & Ahmed Tahoun, 2019. "Firm-Level Political Risk: Measurement and Effects," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(4), pages 2135-2202.
    16. Yao, Shouyu & Pan, Yuying & Sensoy, Ahmet & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Cheng, Feiyang, 2021. "Green credit policy and firm performance: What we learn from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Ashton De Silva & Huu Nhan Duong & My Nguyen & Yen Ngoc Nguyen, 2023. "Bank risk in uncertain times: Do credit rationing and revenue diversification matter?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(7-8), pages 1240-1273, July.
    18. Bertrand Candelon & Laurent Ferrara & Marc Joëts, 2021. "Global financial interconnectedness: a non-linear assessment of the uncertainty channel," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(25), pages 2865-2887, May.
    19. Laurent Ferrara & Pierre Guérin, 2018. "What are the macroeconomic effects of high‐frequency uncertainty shocks?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 662-679, August.
    20. Azqueta-Gavaldon, Andres, 2023. "Political referenda and investment: Evidence from Scotland," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8451-:d:1754123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.