IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8377-d1752524.html

Reshaping Sustainable Technology Progress: The Role of China’s National Carbon Unified Market in the Power Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Jingwen Xia

    (School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Qinghua Pang

    (School of Economics and Finance, Hohai University, Changzhou 213200, China)

  • Fan Ren

    (School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

To achieve carbon peak and neutrality goals and promote sustainable development, the power sector, as China’s largest source of carbon emissions, is the first industry to implement the national carbon emission trading scheme (ETS). A differences-in-differences model is employed on firm-level data to assess the causal impact of China’s national ETS, launched in 2017, on the sustainable technology progress of power generation enterprises. This study employs green patents and total factor productivity as measures for sustainable technology progress and then explores mechanisms and heterogeneity of the impact. Results show that: (1) The national ETS has a positive effect on green innovation capability and efficiency in the power industry, and the increasing causal effect is mainly achieved through research and development expenditure. (2) The national ETS exerts a more significant positive effect on power generation enterprises that are non-state-owned, have smaller asset scale, demonstrate superior environmental performance, and are located in the eastern region. However, there is no significant difference in total factor productivity across power enterprises. (3) Green innovations are predominantly concentrated in new energy and hybrid power generation enterprises. This study contributes to the literature by providing novel empirical evidence from China’s national ETS, highlighting its dual impact on innovation and productivity within a unified framework. The findings not only offer targeted recommendations for China’s power sector but also serve as an important reference for other high-emitting industries and other regions worldwide facing the same challenges in their pursuit of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingwen Xia & Qinghua Pang & Fan Ren, 2025. "Reshaping Sustainable Technology Progress: The Role of China’s National Carbon Unified Market in the Power Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8377-:d:1752524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8377/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8377/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, Kai & Pei, Ping & Zhang, Chao & Wu, Xin, 2017. "Exploring the price dynamics of CO2 emissions allowances in China's emissions trading scheme pilots," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 213-223.
    2. Zhang, Kaixia & Li, Weibing, 2024. "Understanding the puzzle of polluting companies' social responsibility," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Ralf Martin & Mirabelle Muûls & Ulrich J. Wagner, 2016. "The Impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on Regulated Firms: What Is the Evidence after Ten Years?," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(1), pages 129-148.
    4. Löschel, Andreas & Lutz, Benjamin Johannes & Managi, Shunsuke, 2019. "The impacts of the EU ETS on efficiency and economic performance – An empirical analyses for German manufacturing firms," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 71-95.
    5. Seifert, Jan & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese & Wagner, Michael, 2008. "Dynamic behavior of CO2 spot prices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 180-194, September.
    6. Montgomery, W. David, 1972. "Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 395-418, December.
    7. Shen, Lin & Zhang, Wen & Ma, Dan, 2025. "ESG practices and financing constraints of Chinese high-carbon enterprises under carbon reduction pressure: The role of credit financing and corporate reputation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Salter, Ammon J. & Martin, Ben R., 2001. "The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 509-532, March.
    9. Zhang, Yufei & Wang, Li & He, Tengjiao, 2024. "Can IP tribunals increase firm patent applications?—Empirical evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Shaoda Wang & David Y. Yang, 2025. "Policy Experimentation in China: The Political Economy of Policy Learning," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(7), pages 2180-2228.
    11. Cai, Jinyang & Zhu, Mengze & Wu, Jian & Chen, Xueli & Xu, Junjie & Shen, Zhi-Yang, 2025. "Evaluating the impact of new energy vehicle subsidies on urban carbon emissions: Evidence from 261 Chinese cities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    12. Lanoie, Paul & Laplante, Benoit & Roy, Maite, 1998. "Can capital markets create incentives for pollution control?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 31-41, July.
    13. Böhringer, Christoph & Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Storrøsten, Halvor Briseid, 2017. "Robust policies to mitigate carbon leakage," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 35-46.
    14. Yao, Shiyue & Yu, Xueying & Yan, Sen & Wen, Shiyan, 2021. "Heterogeneous emission trading schemes and green innovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    15. Zhao, Xiaoli & Yin, Haitao & Zhao, Yue, 2015. "Impact of environmental regulations on the efficiency and CO2 emissions of power plants in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 238-247.
    16. Giovanni Marin & Marianna Marino & Claudia Pellegrin, 2018. "The Impact of the European Emission Trading Scheme on Multiple Measures of Economic Performance," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(2), pages 551-582, October.
    17. Giovanni Marin & Marianna Marino & Claudia Pellegrin, 2018. "The impact of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme on Multiple Measures of Economic Performance," Post-Print hal-01768870, HAL.
    18. Lee, Jong-Wha, 1996. "Government Interventions and Productivity Growth," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 391-414, September.
    19. Chen, Rushi & Howley, Peter & Kesidou, Effie, 2024. "The impact of ETS on productivity in developing economies: A micro-econometric evaluation with Chinese firm-level data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Zhang, Dongyang & Kong, Qunxi & Wang, Yizhi & Vigne, Samuel A., 2023. "Exquisite workmanship through net-zero emissions? The effects of carbon emission trading policy on firms' export product quality," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    21. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Peng, Yu-Lu & Ma, Chao-Qun & Shen, Bo, 2017. "Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 18-28.
    22. Wang, Can & Ye, Minhua & Cai, Wenjia & Chen, Jining, 2014. "The value of a clear, long-term climate policy agenda: A case study of China’s power sector using a multi-region optimization model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 276-288.
    23. Yang, Lisha & Li, Yutianhao & Liu, Hongxun, 2021. "Did carbon trade improve green production performance? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    24. Yu, Fan & Zheng, Shilin & Zheng, Shuhong & Guo, Chenhao, 2024. "Does carbon ETS affect the distribution of labor's slice of the factor income pie? From the low carbon transition perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    25. Wang, Haijun & Li, Lingchunzi & Sun, Jiaxuan & Shen, Minghao, 2023. "Carbon emissions abatement with duopoly generators and eco-conscious consumers: Carbon tax vs carbon allowance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 786-804.
    26. Caparrós, Alejandro & Péreau, Jean-Christophe & Tazdaït, Tarik, 2013. "Emission trading and international competition: The impact of labor market rigidity on technology adoption and output," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 36-43.
    27. Xu, Xin & Huang, Shupei & An, Haizhong, 2021. "Identification and causal analysis of the influence channels of financial development on CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    28. David Hirshleifer & Po-Hsuan Hsu & Dongmei Li, 2018. "Innovative Originality, Profitability, and Stock Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(7), pages 2553-2605.
    29. Miao, Chenglin & Fang, Debin & Sun, Liyan & Luo, Qiaoling, 2017. "Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 153-161.
    30. Hu, Yucai & Ren, Shenggang & Wang, Yangjie & Chen, Xiaohong, 2020. "Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? Evidence from the industrial sector in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    31. Feng, Taiwen & Sun, Linyan & Zhang, Ying, 2009. "The relationship between energy consumption structure, economic structure and energy intensity in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5475-5483, December.
    32. Yongrok Choi & Ziqian Tang & Yunning Ma, 2024. "Lessons from the Pilot Project of Korean ETS on the Local Landscape of Economy," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    33. Olley, G Steven & Pakes, Ariel, 1996. "The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(6), pages 1263-1297, November.
    34. Yan, Zheming & Du, Keru & Yang, Zhiming & Deng, Min, 2017. "Convergence or divergence? Understanding the global development trend of low-carbon technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 499-509.
    35. Meng, Jia & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2022. "Corporate environmental information disclosure and investor response: Evidence from China's capital market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    36. Xu, Xinkuo & Liu, Qianyu, 2025. "Transformation of innovation in heavily polluting enterprises under resource constraints: The role of green finance policy," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    37. Binbin Yang & Sang Do Park, 2024. "Under the ESG Dome of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-23, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan Ren, 2024. "Does Government Environmental Concern Affect Enterprise Sustainable Development? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Marit Klemetsen & Knut Einar Rosendahl & Anja Lund Jakobsen, 2020. "The Impacts Of The Eu Ets On Norwegian Plants’ Environmental And Economic Performance," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 1-32, February.
    3. Themann, Michael & Koch, Nicolas, 2021. "Catching up and falling behind: Cross-country evidence on the impact of the EU ETS on firm productivity," Ruhr Economic Papers 904, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. D’Arcangelo, Filippo Maria & Pavan, Giulia & Calligaris, Sara, "undated". "The Impact of the European Carbon Market on Firm Productivity: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms," FEEM Working Papers 324170, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    5. Filippo Maria D’Arcangelo & Giulia Pavan & Sara Calligaris, 2022. "The Impact of the European Carbon Market on Firm Productivity: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms," Working Papers 2022.24, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    6. Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Nachtigall, Daniel & Venmans, Frank, 2023. "The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Peng Xiaobao & Wu Jian & Chen Yuhui & Sumran Ali & Xie Qijun, 2024. "Does the carbon emission trading pilot policy promote green innovation cooperation? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Shi, Mengjie & Zhang, Yupu & Meinerding, Christoph, 2025. "The impact of climate policies on financial markets: Evidence from the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism," Discussion Papers 14/2025, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    9. Svetlana V. Doroshenko & Anna D. Mingaleva, 2020. "Carbon Exchanges: European Experience in Developing the Mechanism of Emission Permit Trading," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 52-68, August.
    10. Wang, Junling & Cheng, Siyu & Guo, Xinyu & Xu, Xin & Wang, Zehao, 2024. "An evolutionary analysis of the diffusion of low-carbon technology innovation in supply networks," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    11. Koch, Nicolas & Themann, Michael, 2022. "Catching up and falling behind: Cross-country evidence on the impact of the EU ETS on firm productivity," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. Qiang Tu & Limei Zuo & Jianlei Mo & Yingnan Wang, 2026. "Carbon pricing, green innovation, and production efficiency—new evidence from China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 1-32, March.
    13. Zhang, Jiekuan, 2023. "Emissions trading scheme and energy consumption and output structure: Evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    14. Chu, Baoju & Dong, Yizhe & Liu, Yaorong & Ma, Diandian & Wang, Tianju, 2024. "Does China's emission trading scheme affect corporate financial performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    15. Simone Lazzini & Zeila Occhipinti & Angela Parenti & Roberto Verona, 2021. "Disentangling economic crisis effects from environmental regulation effects: Implications for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2332-2353, July.
    16. Maogang Tang & Silu Cheng & Wenqing Guo & Weibiao Ma & Fengxia Hu, 2023. "Relationship between carbon emission trading schemes and companies’ total factor productivity: evidence from listed companies in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11735-11767, October.
    17. Keyang Zhan & Zhengning Pu, 2025. "Carbon market and emission reduction: evidence from evolutionary game and machine learning," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Benatti, Nicola & Groiss, Martin & Kelly, Petra & Lopez-Garcia, Paloma, 2024. "Environmental regulation and productivity growth in the euro area: Testing the porter hypothesis," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    19. Teixidó, Jordi & Verde, Stefano F. & Nicolli, Francesco, 2019. "The impact of the EU Emissions Trading System on low-carbon technological change: The empirical evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Yu, Xiaolin & Wan, Kai & Du, Qunyang, 2023. "Can carbon market policies achieve a “point-to-surface” effect?—Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8377-:d:1752524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.