IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8355-d1751791.html

The Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Accessibility Analysis of Modern Commemorative Landscapes: A Case Study in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Ziyang Yan

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Zhiyuan Zheng

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Zun Feng

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Suyu Zhong

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Yuan Gao

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Xinwang Sun

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Urban commemorative landscapes serve as vital components of a city’s cultural expression. Employing a two-dimensional “physical-perceptual” accessibility evaluation framework, this study conducted a systematic analysis of the spatial distribution characteristics and accessibility of 124 commemorative landscapes in Nanjing, and investigated the factors influencing their accessibility. The analysis revealed four key findings: (1) A pronounced “core-periphery” pattern was identified, characterized by high-density, evenly distributed clusters in central districts that contrast with sparse, scattered layouts in outer suburbs. (2) Weighting analysis via the entropy method indicated that perceived accessibility (53.96%) exerted a slightly greater influence on composite accessibility than spatial accessibility (46.04%). (3) Modern commemorative landscapes in the main urban areas exhibited strong correlations with road network density and high public perception, and their comprehensive accessibility is significantly better than that of the remote suburban areas. Significant disparities in accessibility were observed among different types of modern commemorative landscapes. The comprehensive accessibility of memorial facilities was found to be the highest, attributable to their balanced spatial distribution and the fact that most of them are distributed in the densely populated main urban areas. (4) Key factors influencing accessibility were identified as attraction carrying capacity, regional population density, and elevation. This study aims to provide a reference for the comprehensive quantitative evaluation of urban commemorative landscapes, thereby promoting the coordinated development of historical space preservation and cultural resource utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziyang Yan & Zhiyuan Zheng & Zun Feng & Suyu Zhong & Yuan Gao & Xinwang Sun, 2025. "The Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Accessibility Analysis of Modern Commemorative Landscapes: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8355-:d:1751791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8355/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8355/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul J. Kelsch, 2022. "Viewing the Landscape of the George Washington Memorial Parkway: A Cultural History of Scenic Resources and Landscape Ideology," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Matthew W. Rofe & Michael Ripmeester, 2023. "Memorial landscapes and contestation: destabilising artefacts of stability," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 609-614, July.
    3. Haisheng Hu, 2025. "Spatial Synergy Between Cultural Heritage and Metro Networks: A Case Study of Distribution Patterns and Value Assessment in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Carlos Moreno & Catherine Gall & Junghyun Woo & Doyun Lee & Madiha Bencekri, 2025. "Assessing accessibility of cultural sites through the 15-minute city framework in Seoul," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 8-39, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jasso Chávez, José Arturo & Manaugh, Kevin, 2025. "How does the spatial scale impact accessibility analysis and equity? The case of accessibility to supermarkets in Montreal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Feng, Xuan & Jia, Ning & Su, Xiaohan & Adams, Matthew D. & Deng, Yongqi & Ling, Shuai, 2025. "Assessing the applicability of the 15-minute city: Insights from a spatial accessibility perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Rouyu Zhengchen & Jiaming Liu & Jiamin Ren & Shuying Zhang & Bingzhi Liu, 2025. "Spatio-Temporal Distribution Evolution Characteristics and Geographical Influencing Factors of Cultural Heritage Sites in Xinjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8355-:d:1751791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.