IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8329-d1751314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative Advantage and Compatibility as Drivers of ChatGPT Adoption in Latin American Higher Education: A PLS SEM Study Towards Sustainable Digital Education

Author

Listed:
  • Juana Beatriz Vargas Bernuy

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Geotechnics, Jorge Basadre Grohmann National University, Tacna 23000, Peru)

  • Marco A. Nolasco-Mamani

    (Private University of Tacna, Tacna 23001, Peru)

  • Norma C. Velásquez Rodríguez

    (Faculty of Economics and Commercial Sciences, Sedes Sapientiae Catholic University, Los Olivos 15301, Peru)

  • Renza L. Gambetta Quelopana

    (Private University of Tacna, Tacna 23001, Peru)

  • Ana N. Martinez Valdivia

    (Private University of Tacna, Tacna 23001, Peru)

  • Sam M. Espinoza Vidaurre

    (Private University of Tacna, Tacna 23001, Peru)

Abstract

As Latin American universities pursue digitally and environmentally sustainable teaching models, understanding why students adopt generative AI is essential. We analyzed data from undergraduate students (n = 792) across five Latin American countries (Peru, Chile, Bolivia, Argentina, and Colombia). Grounded in the diffusion of innovations theory, the study evaluated the effects of relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability on attitudes towards ChatGPT and examined the effect of attitude on intention to use among higher education students in the region. The reliability and validity of the measurement scale were confirmed, and structural relationships were tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The model explained 58.1% of the variance in attitude: relative advantage (β = 0.247) and compatibility (β = 0.246) exerted the largest effects, followed by trialability (β = 0.223) and observability (β = 0.167); complexity showed a weaker yet significant effect (β = 0.118). Attitude strongly predicted the intention to use ChatGPT (β = 0.777), accounting for 60.4% of its variance. All paths were significant ( p < 0.001), and psychometric indicators exceeded recommended thresholds. These findings indicate that student adoption is driven more by perceived academic benefits and alignment with existing learning routines than by technical ease. Highlighting concrete, ethically delineated use cases and providing guided institutional spaces for experimentation may accelerate the responsible, long-term adoption of generative AI in quality higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Juana Beatriz Vargas Bernuy & Marco A. Nolasco-Mamani & Norma C. Velásquez Rodríguez & Renza L. Gambetta Quelopana & Ana N. Martinez Valdivia & Sam M. Espinoza Vidaurre, 2025. "Relative Advantage and Compatibility as Drivers of ChatGPT Adoption in Latin American Higher Education: A PLS SEM Study Towards Sustainable Digital Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8329-:d:1751314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8329/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8329/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Modgil, Sachin & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Rana, Nripendra P. & Gupta, Shivam & Kamble, Sachin, 2022. "Has Covid-19 accelerated opportunities for digital entrepreneurship? An Indian perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Lian, Ying & Tang, Huiting & Xiang, Mengting & Dong, Xuefan, 2024. "Public attitudes and sentiments toward ChatGPT in China: A text mining analysis based on social media," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Sam M. Espinoza Vidaurre & Norma C. Velásquez Rodríguez & Renza L. Gambetta Quelopana & Ana N. Martinez Valdivia & Ernesto A. Leo Rossi & Marco A. Nolasco-Mamani, 2024. "Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Academic Integrity Among University Students in Peru and Chile: An Approach to Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Brem, Alexander & Viardot, Eric & Nylund, Petra A., 2021. "Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: Which technologies will improve our lives?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Wang, Yacan & Douglas, Matthew & Hazen, Benjamin, 2021. "Diffusion of public bicycle systems: Investigating influences of users’ perceived risk and switching intention," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Onea Ioana Alexandra, 2022. "Exploring the COVID-19 pandemic impact on innovation and entrepreneurship – Review and evidence from Global Innovation Index," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 527-544, August.
    2. Crespo, Nuno Fernandes & Crespo, Cátia Fernandes & Silva, Graça Miranda & Nicola, Maura Bedin, 2023. "Innovation in times of crisis: The relevance of digitalization and early internationalization strategies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Darehshiri, Mahsa & Ghaemi Asl, Mahdi & Babatunde Adekoya, Oluwasegun & Shahzad, Umer, 2022. "Cross-spectral coherence and dynamic connectedness among contactless digital payments and digital communities, enterprise collaboration, and virtual reality firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Chopdar, Prasanta Kr & Paul, Justin & Prodanova, Jana, 2022. "Mobile shoppers’ response to Covid-19 phobia, pessimism and smartphone addiction: Does social influence matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Shaobin, Guo & Ahmad, Khalil & Khan, Naqib Ullah, 2024. "Natural resources, geopolitical conflicts, and digital trade: Evidence from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Xi, Xun & Xi, Baoxing & Miao, Chenglin & Yu, Rongjian & Xie, Jie & Xiang, Rong & Hu, Feng, 2022. "Factors influencing technological innovation efficiency in the Chinese video game industry: Applying the meta-frontier approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Martin Thomas Falk & Eva Hagsten, 2023. "Reverse adoption of information and communication technology among organisers of academic conferences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1963-1985, March.
    8. Ferreira, Sara & Amorim, Marco & Lobo, António & Kern, Mira & Fanderl, Nora & Couto, António, 2022. "Travel mode preferences among German commuters over the course of COVID-19 pandemic," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 55-64.
    9. Rehman, Anis ur & Behera, Rajat Kumar & Islam, Md. Saiful & Abbasi, Faraz Ahmad & Imtiaz, Asma, 2024. "Assessing the usage of ChatGPT on life satisfaction among higher education students: The moderating role of subjective health," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Ren, Xiaohang & Li, Yiying & yan, Cheng & Wen, Fenghua & Lu, Zudi, 2022. "The interrelationship between the carbon market and the green bonds market: Evidence from wavelet quantile-on-quantile method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    11. Kajikawa, Yuya & Mejia, Cristian & Wu, Mengjia & Zhang, Yi, 2022. "Academic landscape of Technological Forecasting and Social Change through citation network and topic analyses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Li, Sihong & Chen, Jinglong, 2024. "Virtual human on social media: Text mining and sentiment analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Schmidt, Sebastian & Saraceni, Adriana, 2024. "Consumer acceptance of drone-based technology for last mile delivery," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    14. Haibo Chen & Zongjun Wang & Xuesong Yu, 2021. "Sustainability Strategies of Equipment Introduction and Overcapacity Risk Sharing in Mask Emergency Supply Chains during Pandemics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Sun, Shanshan & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "An investigation of self-service technology usage during the COVID-19 pandemic: The changing perceptions of ‘self’ and technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    16. Wu, Chih-Wen & Botella-Carrubi, Dolores & Blanco-González-Tejero, Cristina, 2024. "The empirical study of digital marketing strategy and performance in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    17. Jiang, Yangyang & Stylos, Nikolaos, 2021. "Triggers of consumers’ enhanced digital engagement and the role of digital technologies in transforming the retail ecosystem during COVID-19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    18. Mauro Rodriguez-Marin & José Manuel Saiz-Alvarez & Lizette Huezo-Ponce, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis on Pay-per-Click as an Instrument for Digital Entrepreneurship Management Using VOSviewer and SCOPUS Data Analysis Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Yating Wen & Xiaodong Zhao & Xingguo Li & Yuqi Zang, 2025. "Attitude Mining Toward Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Challenges and Responses for Sustainable Development in Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-26, January.
    20. Adhikari, Pawan & Upadhaya, Bedanand & Wijethilake, Chaminda & Dhakal Adhikari, Shovita, 2023. "The sociomateriality of digitalisation in Nepalese NGOs," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8329-:d:1751314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.