IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8270-d1749519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Conflict to Coexistence: Integrated Landscape Optimization for Sustainable Tourism in Urban Tourism Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Shen

    (School of Public Administration, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Lei Li

    (Department of Geography, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236000, China
    Graduate School of Global Environment Studies, Sophia University, Tokyo 102-8554, Japan)

  • Liang Peng

    (School of Economy, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 210023, China)

Abstract

Urban Tourism Areas (UTAs) face growing challenges in balancing tourism development with ecological preservation, particularly under the pressures of rapid urbanization and intensified land use. However, systematic approaches to optimizing landscape patterns in urban tourism contexts remain limited. The aim of this study is to develop and apply an integrated framework that combines ecological sensitivity evaluation and landscape eco-ethics to guide sustainable landscape optimization. Using Shihe District in Xinyang City, China—a region marked by diverse natural landscapes and intensive human–environment interactions—as a case study, we applied a multi-indicator ecological sensitivity assessment together with landscape pattern analysis, supported by Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and FRAGSTATS software. The results revealed significant spatial heterogeneity in ecological sensitivity across the district. High- and very-high-sensitivity zones accounted for 23.2% of the total area, primarily located in southwestern mountainous regions, while low-sensitivity zones covered 53.8%, concentrated in urban plains and lowlands. The landscape exhibited a Shannon’s Diversity Index (SHDI) of 0.8617 and an Edge Density (ED) of 17.05, reflecting a moderately fragmented spatial structure. Based on these findings, a hierarchical optimization strategy was proposed, delineating three protection zones: primary conservation zones (23.2%), secondary buffer zones (22.9%), and development-prioritized zones (53.8%). This framework promotes ecological integrity, supports balanced tourism development, and accommodates the needs of both tourists and local communities. The model has potential applicability to other global UTAs facing similar conflicts between ecological protection and tourism expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Shen & Lei Li & Liang Peng, 2025. "From Conflict to Coexistence: Integrated Landscape Optimization for Sustainable Tourism in Urban Tourism Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8270-:d:1749519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8270/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8270/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Yanguang, 2020. "Equivalent relation between normalized spatial entropy and fractal dimension," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 553(C).
    2. Guoyi Wei & Zhao Yang & Chaozhong Liang & Xuewei Yang & Shuiming Zhang, 2022. "Urban Lake Scenic Protected Area Zoning Based on Ecological Sensitivity Analysis and Remote Sensing: A Case Study of Chaohu Lake Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Feng, Zhe & Jin, Xueru & Chen, Tianqian & Wu, Jiansheng, 2021. "Understanding trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services to support the decision-making in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Tianshu Liu & Xiangbin Peng & Junjie Li, 2024. "Evaluation of Ecological Sensitivity and Spatial Correlation Analysis of Landscape Patterns in Sanjiangyuan National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Duan & Pu Shi & Yuanyuan Yang & Dongyan Wang, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Change Analysis and Multi-Scenario Modeling of Ecosystem Service Values: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Maria del Carmen Soto-Camacho & Jazmin Susana De la Cruz-Garcia & Juan Bory-Reyes & Aldo Ramirez-Arellano, 2025. "Volume Dimension of Mass Functions in Complex Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Yang Yi & Chen Zhang & Jinqi Zhu & Yugang Zhang & Hao Sun & Hongzhang Kang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution, Prediction and Optimization of LUCC Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Models: A Case Study of Mentougou District, Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Jingheng Wang & Meichen Fu & Xiangxue Han & Yuting Wu & Hongyan Wen, 2025. "Research on Human Needs and the Valorization of Supply–Need Relationships in Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Southwest Karst Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
    5. Mengxue Liu & Xiaobin Dong & Xuechao Wang & Bingyu Zhao & Hejie Wei & Weiguo Fan & Chenyang Zhang, 2022. "The Trade-Offs/Synergies and Their Spatial-Temporal Characteristics between Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being Linked to Land-Use Change in the Capital Region of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Menghao Qi & Mingcan Sun & Qinping Liu & Hongzhen Tian & Yanchao Sun & Mengmeng Yang & Hui Zhang, 2025. "Multi-Scale Ecosystem Service Supply–Demand Dynamics and Driving Mechanisms in Mainland China During the Last Two Decades: Implications for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-29, July.
    7. Tianshu Liu & Xiangbin Peng & Junjie Li, 2024. "Evaluation of Ecological Sensitivity and Spatial Correlation Analysis of Landscape Patterns in Sanjiangyuan National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Qiurong Xu & Ruipeng Li & Jia Yu & Pei Zhang, 2023. "Synergies and Trade-Offs among Different Ecosystem Services through the Analyses of Spatio-Temporal Changes in Beijing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Keyu Luo & Zhenyu Wang & Wei Sha & Jiansheng Wu & Hongliang Wang & Qingliang Zhu, 2021. "Integrating Sponge City Concept and Neural Network into Land Suitability Assessment: Evidence from a Satellite Town of Shenzhen Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Liu, Yu & Liu, Zhengjia & Zhang, Xun & Zhang, Bin & Shi, Jinlian & Liu, Aijun & Chang, Shujuan & Yang, Yong & Wang, Yu, 2024. "Spatially explicit priority optimization of land ecosystem services in the ecologically fragile region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Jinyan Liu & Junyi Li & Daoyuan Chen & Linye Guo & Guochang Ding & Jianwen Dong, 2024. "Differential Analysis of Island Mountain Plant Community Characteristics: Ecological Sensitivity Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Yang, Hao & Zou, Runyan & Hu, Yueming & Wang, Lu & Xie, Yingkai & Tan, Zhengxi & Zhu, Zhiqiang & Zhu, A.-Xing & Gong, Jianzhou & Mao, Xiaoyun, 2024. "Sustainable utilization of cultivated land resources based on "element coupling-function synergy" analytical framework: A case study of Guangdong, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    13. Muyi Huang & Qilong Wang & Qi Yin & Weihua Li & Guozhao Zhang & Qiaojun Ke & Qin Guo, 2023. "Analysis of Ecosystem Service Contribution and Identification of Trade-Off/Synergy Relationship for Ecosystem Regulation in the Dabie Mountains of Western Anhui Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Jinjin Wu & Xueru Jin & Zhe Feng & Tianqian Chen & Chenxu Wang & Dingrao Feng & Jiaqi Lv, 2021. "Relationship of Ecosystem Services in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Based on the Production Possibility Frontier," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Hui Li & Qing Xu & Huiyi Qiu & Jiaheng Du & Zhenzhou Xu & Longying Liu & Zixiu Zhao & Zixin Zhu & Yun He, 2024. "Study on Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Synergies in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area Based on Ecosystem Service Bundles," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, December.
    16. Răzvan-Cornel Sfetcu & Vasile Preda, 2023. "Fractal Divergences of Generalized Jacobi Polynomials," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    17. Yanqi Zhao & Yue Zhang & Ying Yang & Fan Li & Rongkun Dai & Jianlin Li & Mingshi Wang & Zhenhua Li, 2023. "The Impact of Land Use Structure Change on Utilization Performance in Henan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Ziyi Zhang & Zhaomin Tong & Feifei Fan & Ke Liang, 2025. "How to Achieve Integrated High Supply and a Balanced State of Ecosystem Service Bundles: A Case Study of Fujian Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Jinxiao Li & Guijun Zhang & Pengtao Zhang & Siyu Jing & Jie Dong, 2023. "Simulation and Zoning Research on the Ecosystem Service in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region Based on SSP–RCP Scenarios," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Maaroufi, Nadir & Zerouali, El Hassan, 2023. "Point-extended box dimension," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8270-:d:1749519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.