IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8247-d1748972.html

The Role and Potential of Timber in Construction for Achieving Climate Neutrality Objectives in Latvia

Author

Listed:
  • Edgars Pudzis

    (Institute of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, 6A Ķīpsalas Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Antra Kundziņa

    (Economics and Business Institute, Faculty of Engineering Economics and Management, Riga Technical University, 6 Kalnciema Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

  • Pēteris Druķis

    (Institute of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Riga Technical University, 6A Ķīpsalas Street, LV-1048 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

Low-carbon development is closely linked to the concept of sustainability, which focuses on both economic growth and the targeted reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, facilitating the transition to climate neutrality. This process involves the efficient use of resources and necessitates systemic transformations across various sectors of the economy. For Latvia to achieve its climate neutrality objectives, it is essential to adhere to the principles of the bioeconomy, with a particular emphasis on the use of timber in construction. This approach combines opportunities for economic development with environmental protection, as timber is a renewable resource that contributes to carbon sequestration. The utilisation of timber in construction enables carbon storage within buildings and substitutes traditional materials such as concrete and steel, the production of which is highly energy-intensive and generates substantial CO 2 emissions. Consequently, timber use also reduces indirect emissions associated with the construction sector. The objective of this study is to identify the main barriers hindering the broader application of timber construction materials in Latvia’s building sector and to propose solutions to overcome these obstacles. The research tasks include an analysis of climate neutrality and construction targets within the EU and Latvia; an examination of the current situation and influencing factors regarding Latvia’s forest resources, their harvesting, processing, use in construction, and trade balance; and the identification of critical problem areas and the delineation of possible solutions. For theoretical and situational analyses, the authors employ methods such as scientific literature review, policy content analysis, descriptive methodology, statistical data analysis, and interpretation of quantitative and qualitative data. The results are synthesised using PESTEL analysis, which serves as a continuation and elaboration of the initial SWOT analysis assessment and is visualised through graphical representation. The authors of this study participated in a national-level expert group whose members represented the Parliament of the Republic of Latvia, responsible ministries, forest managers, construction companies, wood product manufacturers, and representatives from higher education and research institutions. The following hypotheses are proposed and substantiated in this article: (1) Latvia possesses sufficient forest resources to increase the share of timber used in construction, (2) increasing the use of timber in construction would significantly contribute to both Latvia’s economic development and the achievement of climate neutrality targets, and (3) the expansion of timber use in the construction sector depends on a restructuring of national policy across multiple sectors. Suggested solutions include the improvement of regulatory frameworks for timber harvesting, processing, and utilisation in related sectors—agriculture and forestry, wood processing, and construction. The key challenges for policymakers include addressing the identified deficiencies in Latvia’s progress toward achieving its CO 2 targets, introducing qualitative changes in timber harvesting conditions, and amending regulations governing the forest management cycle accordingly. For timber processing companies, it is crucial to ensure stable conditions for their commercial activity. Promoting the use of timber in construction requires a broad set of changes in safety and financial regulations and procurement requirements. Timber construction is relevant not only in the building sector but also in civil engineering, and modifications and additions to educational programmes are necessary. The promotion of timber use among the wider public is of great importance. At all stages of timber processing—from harvesting to integration in buildings—access to financial resources should be facilitated. As numerous sectors of the national economy (agriculture, forestry, wood processing, construction, logistics, etc.) are involved in timber processing, interdisciplinary research is required to address complex challenges that demand expertise from multiple fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Edgars Pudzis & Antra Kundziņa & Pēteris Druķis, 2025. "The Role and Potential of Timber in Construction for Achieving Climate Neutrality Objectives in Latvia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8247-:d:1748972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8247/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8247/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Tupenaite & Viktorija Zilenaite & Loreta Kanapeckiene & Tomas Gecys & Ineta Geipele, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Modern High-Rise Timber Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Laura Tupenaite & Arturas Kaklauskas & Irene Lill & Ineta Geipele & Jurga Naimaviciene & Loreta Kanapeckiene & Linda Kauskale, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment of the New Residential Projects in the Baltic States: A Multiple Criteria Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Jim Hart & Francesco Pomponi, 2020. "More Timber in Construction: Unanswered Questions and Future Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martyna Maniak-Huesser & Lars G. F. Tellnes & Edwin Zea Escamilla, 2021. "Mind the Gap: A Policy Gap Analysis of Programmes Promoting Timber Construction in Nordic Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Yue He & Shilong Piao & Philippe Ciais & Hao Xu & Thomas Gasser, 2024. "Future land carbon removals in China consistent with national inventory," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Tayefi Nasrabadi, Mahla & Hataminejad, Hossein, 2021. "Towards residential buildings sustainability in a religious-tourism metropolis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Maija Kavosa & Inga Lapina & Konstantins Kozlovskis, 2022. "Sustainable Approach to Certification of Persons: Ensuring Reliability and Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Witold Chmielarz & Marek Zborowski, 2020. "Towards Sustainability in E-Banking Website Assessment Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Nomeda Dobrovolskienė & Anastasija Pozniak, 2021. "Simple Additive Weighting versus Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution: which method is better suited for assessing the sustainability of a real estate project," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 180-196, June.
    7. Wei Jiang & Wentao Lu Qiu & Sheng-Hau Lin & Huiming Lv & Xiaofeng Zhao & Hao Cong, 2023. "A New Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Promoting Sustainable Social Rental Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-29, April.
    8. Laura Tupenaite & Viktorija Zilenaite & Loreta Kanapeckiene & Tomas Gecys & Ineta Geipele, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Modern High-Rise Timber Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Duc Binh Tran & Van Tan Tran & Xuan Anh Pham & Van Tuan Nguyen, 2023. "A General Framework for Sustainability Assessment of Buildings: A Life-Cycle Thinking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Sanchaniya Rashmi Jaymin & Geipele Ineta, 2024. "Impact of Strategical Sustainability on Real Estate Industry’s Sustainability Performance," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 59-66, January.
    11. Jungwon Yoon & Jihye Lee, 2019. "Adaptive Reuse of Apartments as Heritage Assets in the Seoul Station Urban Regeneration Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-31, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8247-:d:1748972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.