Author
Listed:
- Delphine Bouvier
(L’Oréal Research and Innovation, 93600 Aulnay-sous-Bois, France)
- Mathieu Bayot
(Soliance Alimentaire, 69003 Lyon, France)
- Sydney Girard
(UR ETTIS, INRAE, 33612 Cestas, France)
- Bertrand Lacroix
(L’Oréal Research and Innovation, 94550 Chevilly-Larue, France)
- Elsa Ogé
(L’Oréal Research and Innovation, 94550 Chevilly-Larue, France)
- Aurore Dieu
(L’Oréal Research and Innovation, 93600 Aulnay-sous-Bois, France)
- Magda Carrasco
(L’Oréal Research and Innovation, 93600 Aulnay-sous-Bois, France)
- David Hazoumé
(L’Oréal Research and Innovation, 93600 Aulnay-sous-Bois, France)
Abstract
Utilizing more bioresources exposes supply chains to agricultural risks. Therefore, sustainable agricultural practices are crucial for supporting a resilient transition. This requires tools for assessing the environmental performance of cropping systems. However, most existing tools are not adapted to the operational realities of, for example, cosmetics supply chains. The Field Cultivation Index (FCI) has been developed with a threefold aim: 1. assess cropping systems’ strengths and weaknesses and guide their improvement; 2. compare cropping systems to identify the most environmentally friendly; 3. promote initiatives and efforts made to improve sustainability. It also meets the requirements for tackling the specific operational challenges of global industries like cosmetics: it is (i) simple (data collection is easy and straightforward), (ii) deployable in all regions of the world (with a diversity of soils, climates, etc.), and (iii) adaptable to all cropping systems (industrial, family, etc.) and all plant species (perennials, annuals, etc.). Its methodology is based on scientifically recognized evaluation methods and economic operator initiatives. It is built around a theoretical framework embodying the concepts of regenerative agriculture, enabling the qualitative assessment of the impact of cropping systems on five main regenerative environmental outcomes: soil quality improvement water resource conservation biodiversity enhancement, pesticide reduction, and carbon emission mitigation. This article describes the FCI methodology and reveals initial results from the evaluation of about 40 diversified cropping systems. It demonstrates that the FCI is an operational, sensitive, and educational tool capable of determining the performance level of diversified cropping systems, while highlighting the need for a high level of regenerative practice deployment to achieve satisfactory scores. The tool supports farmers and supply chains in assessing and improving the environmental profile of agricultural production systems in line with sustainability goals. Finally, this paper discusses the benefits, limitations, and potential uses of this tool for monitoring the environmental impact of cropping systems within cosmetics supply chains.
Suggested Citation
Delphine Bouvier & Mathieu Bayot & Sydney Girard & Bertrand Lacroix & Elsa Ogé & Aurore Dieu & Magda Carrasco & David Hazoumé, 2025.
"The Field Cultivation Index, a New Method for Assessing Agricultural Practices’ Sustainability and Moving Towards Regenerative Agriculture—Application to Cosmetic Supply Chains,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-18, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8223-:d:1748410
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8223-:d:1748410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.