IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8155-d1746533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Quality of Urban Agricultural Landscapes Through an Analysis of Globally Distributed Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaochuan Xing

    (Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, 48121 Ravenna, Italy)

Abstract

Urban agricultural landscapes (UALs) constitute a vital component of urban agriculture (UA) initiatives. Nevertheless, rational and systematic evaluation guidelines remain lacking. This study, based on 16 UA case studies, aims to explore the value of UAL quality through a constructed evaluation system. It uses a combined methodology of literature review and case study analysis, alongside an urban agricultural landscape quality assessment (UALQA) framework. The evaluation system contains three dimensions—landscape design, landscape space, and landscape facilities—and 8 indicators with 25 sub-indicators. This study quantitatively assesses the 16 representative cases. The findings indicate that landscape design exerts the greatest influence on urban agricultural landscape quality (UALQ). Within the landscape space dimension, Sydney City Farm achieves the highest score (0.82). Within the landscape design dimension, Rijnvliet Edible Neighbourhood achieves the highest score (0.99). Within the landscape facilities dimension, La Ferme du Rail achieves the highest score (0.39). Through quantitative analysis, this study clarifies the characteristics of each case and proposes specific design strategies across the three dimensions to enhance UALQ. This research not only provides empirical evidence for constructing and applying quality systems but also stimulates fresh perspectives on the opportunities presented by UALs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaochuan Xing, 2025. "Exploring the Quality of Urban Agricultural Landscapes Through an Analysis of Globally Distributed Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-29, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8155-:d:1746533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8155/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8155/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8155-:d:1746533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.