IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8145-d1746521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Metaheuristic-Based Planning of Rural Medium- Voltage Grids: A Comparative Study of Spanning and Steiner Tree Topologies for Cost-Efficient Electrification

Author

Listed:
  • Lina María Riaño-Enciso

    (Grupo de Compatibilidad e Interferencia Electromagnética (GCEM), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá 110231, Colombia)

  • Brandon Cortés-Caicedo

    (Grupo de Compatibilidad e Interferencia Electromagnética (GCEM), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá 110231, Colombia
    Departamento de Eléctrica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Institución Universitaria Pascual Bravo, Medellín 050036, Colombia)

  • Oscar Danilo Montoya

    (Grupo de Compatibilidad e Interferencia Electromagnética (GCEM), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá 110231, Colombia)

  • Luis Fernando Grisales-Noreña

    (Grupo de Investigación en Alta Tensión—GRALTA, Escuela de Ingeniería Eléctrica y Electrónica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760015, Colombia)

  • Jesús C. Hernández

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Jaén, Campus Lagunillas s/n, Edificio A3, 23071 Jaén, Spain)

Abstract

This paper presents a heuristic methodology for the optimal expansion of unbalanced three-phase distribution systems in rural areas, simultaneously addressing feeder routing and conductor sizing to minimize the total annualized cost—defined as the sum of investments in conductors and operational energy losses. The planning strategy explores two radial topological models: the Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) and the Steiner Tree (ST). The latter incorporates auxiliary nodes to reduce the total line length. For each topology, an initial conductor sizing is performed based on three-phase power flow calculations using Broyden’s method, capturing the unbalanced nature of the rural networks. These initial solutions are refined via four metaheuristic algorithms—the Chu–Beasley Genetic Algorithm (CBGA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), the Sine–Cosine Algorithm (SCA), and the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO)—under a master–slave optimization framework. Numerical experiments on 15-, 25- and 50-node rural test systems show that the ST combined with GWO consistently achieves the lowest total costs—reducing expenditures by up to 70.63% compared to MST configurations—and exhibits superior robustness across all performance metrics, including best-, average-, and worst-case solutions, as well as standard deviation. Beyond its technical contributions, the proposed methodology supports the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals by promoting universal energy access (SDG 7), fostering cost-effective rural infrastructure (SDG 9), and contributing to reductions in urban–rural inequalities in electricity access (SDG 10). All simulations were implemented in MATLAB 2024a, demonstrating the practical viability and scalability of the method for planning rural distribution networks under unbalanced load conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lina María Riaño-Enciso & Brandon Cortés-Caicedo & Oscar Danilo Montoya & Luis Fernando Grisales-Noreña & Jesús C. Hernández, 2025. "Sustainable Metaheuristic-Based Planning of Rural Medium- Voltage Grids: A Comparative Study of Spanning and Steiner Tree Topologies for Cost-Efficient Electrification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-39, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8145-:d:1746521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8145-:d:1746521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.