Author
Listed:
- Fangyuan Sun
(School of Journalism & Communication, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China)
- Zeming Kong
(School of International Communication and Arts, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)
Abstract
While scientific and technological advancements drive societal progress, they have concurrently contributed to environmental pollution and climate change. Given the intrinsic interconnection between communication and environmental studies, this research leverages data from the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS 2021) as its sample. Employing structural equation modeling (SEM), the study investigates the impact of media usage and perception of climate change issues on willingness to pay (WTP) for environmental protection. This study aims to investigate the interrelationships between media usage, climate perception, and WTP for environmental protection among Chinese residents through innovative model construction and variable selection, seeking to contribute to the enhancement of environmental protection from the perspective of media usage. Results indicate that media usage frequency (MU) positively predicts environmental concern (EC), climate risk perception (CRP), and WTP. Media trustworthiness (MT) positively influences climate impact perception (CIP), EC, and environmental satisfaction (ES). Climate impact perception negatively predicts WTP, while climate risk perception negatively affects ES. Environmental concern positively predicts both ES and WTP, and ES further positively predicts WTP. To enhance public environmental awareness, improve ES, and strengthen WTP for sustainable climate governance, we recommend that media institutions intensify climate risk communication and construct science-based narrative frameworks, while governmental bodies should improve environmental governance systems to elevate public satisfaction.
Suggested Citation
Fangyuan Sun & Zeming Kong, 2025.
"How Media and Climate Perception Affect Residents’ Willingness to Pay for Environmental Protection: Evidence from China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-13, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8138-:d:1746206
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8138-:d:1746206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.