IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8100-d1745387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical Seniority vs. Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism Sustainability Education: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Thowayeb H. Hassan

    (Social Studies Department, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 400, Saudi Arabia)

  • Muhannad Mohammed Alfehaid

    (Department of Geography and GIS, College of Social Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia)

  • Fahad Mohammed Alhuqbani

    (Tourism & Hotel Management Department, College of Tourism & Archaeology, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mostafa A. Hassanin

    (Mass Media Communication Department, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 400, Saudi Arabia)

  • Omar M. Ali

    (Arabic Language Department, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 400, Saudi Arabia)

  • Kurmanbek Narynbek Uulu

    (Department of Tourism and Recreational Geography, Faculty of Geography, Ecology and Tourism, Kyrgyz National University of J. Balasagyn, Bishkek 720033, Kyrgyzstan)

  • Pereș Ana Cornelia

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Protection, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Amany E. Salem

    (Social Studies Department, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 400, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Seniority-based hierarchical structures in higher education may hinder innovation in hospitality and tourism (H&T) sustainability education; therefore, this study applies Social Exchange Theory (SET) to examine how these hierarchies affect curriculum development and modernization in H&T programs. We used semi-structured interviews with 22 faculty members and administrators from hospitality and tourism programs across multiple universities—including four university presidents, three deans, three department heads, one professor, four associate professors, four assistant professors, and three lecturers with work experience ranging from 3 to 30 years—and we explored social exchange dynamics including reciprocity, trust, power imbalances, and perceived obligations that influence the integration of contemporary sustainable practices. Findings indicate that rigid seniority systems impede sustainability curriculum modernization and limit the incorporation of innovative industry expertise; however, institutions implementing SET principles—characterized by equitable recognition and balanced exchange between academic tenure and industry experience—demonstrate superior adaptability and better prepare students for evolving sustainability demands. This research illuminates organizational dynamics governing educational innovation and provides SET-based recommendations for developing institutional cultures that effectively bridge academic tradition with industry relevance and sustainability imperatives in H&T education.

Suggested Citation

  • Thowayeb H. Hassan & Muhannad Mohammed Alfehaid & Fahad Mohammed Alhuqbani & Mostafa A. Hassanin & Omar M. Ali & Kurmanbek Narynbek Uulu & Pereș Ana Cornelia & Amany E. Salem, 2025. "Hierarchical Seniority vs. Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism Sustainability Education: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8100-:d:1745387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8100-:d:1745387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.