IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8100-d1745387.html

Hierarchical Seniority vs. Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism Sustainability Education: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Thowayeb H. Hassan

    (Social Studies Department, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 400, Saudi Arabia)

  • Muhannad Mohammed Alfehaid

    (Department of Geography and GIS, College of Social Sciences, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia)

  • Fahad Mohammed Alhuqbani

    (Tourism & Hotel Management Department, College of Tourism & Archaeology, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mostafa A. Hassanin

    (Mass Media Communication Department, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 400, Saudi Arabia)

  • Omar M. Ali

    (Arabic Language Department, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 400, Saudi Arabia)

  • Kurmanbek Narynbek Uulu

    (Department of Tourism and Recreational Geography, Faculty of Geography, Ecology and Tourism, Kyrgyz National University of J. Balasagyn, Bishkek 720033, Kyrgyzstan)

  • Pereș Ana Cornelia

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Protection, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania)

  • Amany E. Salem

    (Social Studies Department, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 400, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Seniority-based hierarchical structures in higher education may hinder innovation in hospitality and tourism (H&T) sustainability education; therefore, this study applies Social Exchange Theory (SET) to examine how these hierarchies affect curriculum development and modernization in H&T programs. We used semi-structured interviews with 22 faculty members and administrators from hospitality and tourism programs across multiple universities—including four university presidents, three deans, three department heads, one professor, four associate professors, four assistant professors, and three lecturers with work experience ranging from 3 to 30 years—and we explored social exchange dynamics including reciprocity, trust, power imbalances, and perceived obligations that influence the integration of contemporary sustainable practices. Findings indicate that rigid seniority systems impede sustainability curriculum modernization and limit the incorporation of innovative industry expertise; however, institutions implementing SET principles—characterized by equitable recognition and balanced exchange between academic tenure and industry experience—demonstrate superior adaptability and better prepare students for evolving sustainability demands. This research illuminates organizational dynamics governing educational innovation and provides SET-based recommendations for developing institutional cultures that effectively bridge academic tradition with industry relevance and sustainability imperatives in H&T education.

Suggested Citation

  • Thowayeb H. Hassan & Muhannad Mohammed Alfehaid & Fahad Mohammed Alhuqbani & Mostafa A. Hassanin & Omar M. Ali & Kurmanbek Narynbek Uulu & Pereș Ana Cornelia & Amany E. Salem, 2025. "Hierarchical Seniority vs. Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism Sustainability Education: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8100-:d:1745387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jürgen Mihm & Christoph H. Loch & Dennis Wilkinson & Bernardo A. Huberman, 2010. "Hierarchical Structure and Search in Complex Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 831-848, May.
    2. Kevin C. Duncan & Lisi Krall & Joel G. Maxcy & Mark J. Prus, 2004. "Faculty Productivity, Seniority, and Salary Compression," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 293-310, Spring.
    3. Flabbi, Luca & Ichino, Andrea, 2001. "Productivity, seniority and wages: new evidence from personnel data," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 359-387, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Bayo-Moriones & Jose E. Galdon-Sanchez & Maia Güell, 2010. "Is seniority-based pay used as a motivational device? Evidence from plant-level data," Research in Labor Economics, in: Jobs, Training, and Worker Well-being, pages 155-187, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    2. Antonio Cabrales, 2010. "The causes and economic consequences of envy," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 1(4), pages 371-386, September.
    3. Boeri, Tito & Garibaldi, Pietro & Moen, Espen R., 2017. "Inside severance pay," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 211-225.
    4. Sauermann, Jan, 2014. "The Heterogeneous Effects of Bonus Pay on Performance Outcomes: Evidence from Personnel Data," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100568, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. repec:ilo:ilowps:386486 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Michael Carlos Best & Henrik Jacobsen Jacobsen, 2013. "Optimal Income Taxation with Career Effects of Work Effort," Working Papers 2013-9, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    7. Catherine Haeck & Frank Verboven, 2012. "The Internal Economics of a University: Evidence from Personnel Data," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(3), pages 591-626.
    8. Grund, Christian, 2002. "The Wage Policy of Firms: Comparative Evidence for the U.S. and Germany from Personnel Data," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 30/2002, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    9. Juho Jokinen & Jaakko Pehkonen, 2017. "Promotions and Earnings – Gender or Merit? Evidence from Longitudinal Personnel Data," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 306-334, September.
    10. Anders Frederiksen & Lisa B. Kahn & Fabian Lange, 2020. "Supervisors and Performance Management Systems," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2123-2187.
    11. Daniel A. Levinthal & Maciej Workiewicz, 2018. "When Two Bosses Are Better Than One: Nearly Decomposable Systems and Organizational Adaptation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 207-224, April.
    12. Mario Bossler & Philipp Grunau, 2020. "Asymmetric information in external versus internal promotions," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(6), pages 2977-2998, December.
    13. Frederiksen, Anders & Lange, Fabian & Kriechel, Ben, 2017. "Subjective performance evaluations and employee careers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 408-429.
    14. Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2013. "Preference for increasing wages: How do people value various streams of income?," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 74-90, January.
    15. Adrian Chadi & Clemens Hetschko, 2021. "How Job Changes Affect People's Lives — Evidence from Subjective Well‐Being Data," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 279-306, June.
    16. Nicola Gagliardi & Elena Grinza & François Rycx, 2021. "Can You Teach an Old Dog New Tricks? New Evidence on the Impact of Tenure on Productivity," Working Papers CEB 21-007, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    17. Christopher M. Schlick & Soenke Duckwitz & Sebastian Schneider, 2013. "Project dynamics and emergent complexity," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 480-515, December.
    18. Oliver Baumann & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2013. "Dealing with Complexity: Integrated vs. Chunky Search Processes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 116-132, February.
    19. Mohsen Jafari Songhori & Madjid Tavana & Takao Terano, 2020. "Product development team formation: effects of organizational- and product-related factors," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 88-122, March.
    20. John S. Heywood & Uwe Jirjahn, 2015. "The German Labor Market for Older Workers in Comparative Perspective," Research Papers in Economics 2015-02, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    21. Susana Iranzo & Fabiano Schivardi & Elisa Tosetti, 2008. "Skill Dispersion and Firm Productivity: An Analysis with Employer-Employee Matched Data," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 247-285, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8100-:d:1745387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.