IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p8062-d1744277.html

The Impact of Technological Progress and Industrial Structure Upgrading on Agricultural Economic Resilience: An Empirical Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Changyu Ren

    (College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Weizhong Liu

    (College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Tong Xiao

    (College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)

  • Alessandra Castellini

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 50, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

  • Giulia Maesano

    (Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 50, 40127 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

Technological advancements are a key engine for improving productivity and are fundamental to enhancing the resilience of the agricultural economy by influencing production methods and driving structural transformation. The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of technological progress on agricultural economic resilience in China, with particular attention to (i) its direct effects on resistance, recovery, and reconstruction; (ii) its indirect effects through the upgrading of the agricultural industrial structure; and (iii) its potential nonlinear effects under different structural thresholds. To achieve this, a multidimensional evaluation framework has been developed to assess agricultural economic resilience through three distinct dimensions: resistance, recovery, and reconstruction. Using fixed effects, mediation, threshold and spatial Durbin models, we empirically analyze the impact pathways. The results suggest that technological progress significantly increases agricultural resilience, with robustness confirmed by various tests including model substitution and variable replacement. Furthermore, regional heterogeneity is evident, with the central region showing the strongest positive effect. The mediation analysis shows that modernization of industrial structure serves as an important transmission channel, while the threshold regression identifies nonlinear effects, with significant improvements occurring beyond certain structural thresholds. The results underline the importance of promoting technological innovation in agriculture, developing region-specific support measures and accelerating structural optimization to strengthen the resilience of agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Changyu Ren & Weizhong Liu & Tong Xiao & Alessandra Castellini & Giulia Maesano, 2025. "The Impact of Technological Progress and Industrial Structure Upgrading on Agricultural Economic Resilience: An Empirical Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8062-:d:1744277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8062/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8062/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christophe Béné & Derek Headey & Lawrence Haddad & Klaus Grebmer, 2016. "Is resilience a useful concept in the context of food security and nutrition programmes? Some conceptual and practical considerations," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 123-138, February.
    2. Ika Darnhofer, 2014. "Resilience and why it matters for farm management," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 41(3), pages 461-484.
    3. Mingdou Zhang & Qingbang Wu & Weilu Li & Dongqi Sun & Fei Huang, 2021. "Intensifier of urban economic resilience: Specialized or diversified agglomeration?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Gu & Jinyu Sun & Jianming Cai & Yanwen Xie & Jiahao Guo, 2024. "Urban Planning Perspective on Food Resilience Assessment and Practice in the Zhengzhou Metropolitan Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Egamberdiev, Bekhzod & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Kuhn, Lena & Glauben, Thomas & Akramov, Kamiljon, 2024. "Household resilience and coping strategies to food insecurity: An empirical analysis from Tajikistan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 1646-1661.
    3. Daniele, Bertolozzi-Caredio & Barbara, Soriano & Isabel, Bardaji & Alberto, Garrido, 2022. "Analysis of perceived robustness, adaptability and transformability of Spanish extensive livestock farms under alternative challenging scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Katarzyna Zawalińska & Alexandra Smyrniotopoulou & Katalin Balazs & Michael Böhm & Mihai Chitea & Violeta Florian & Mihaela Fratila & Piotr Gradziuk & Stuart Henderson & Katherine Irvine & Vasilia Kon, 2022. "Advancing the Contributions of European Stakeholders in Farming Systems to Transitions to Agroecology," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 50-63, December.
    5. Basharat Ali & Peter Dahlhaus, 2022. "Roles of Selective Agriculture Practices in Sustainable Agricultural Performance: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Christophe Béné & Alex Cornelius & Fanny Howland, 2018. "Bridging Humanitarian Responses and Long-Term Development through Transformative Changes—Some Initial Reflections from the World Bank’s Adaptive Social Protection Program in the Sahel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Khalilullah Mayar & David G. Carmichael & Xuesong Shen, 2022. "Resilience and Systems—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Thorsøe, Martin Hvarregaard & Noe, Egon Bjørnshave & Lamandé, Mathieu & Frelih-Larsen, Ana & Kjeldsen, Chris & Zandersen, Marianne & Schjønning, Per, 2019. "Sustainable soil management - Farmers’ perspectives on subsoil compaction and the opportunities and barriers for intervention," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 427-437.
    9. George Van Voorn & Geerten Hengeveld & Jan Verhagen, 2020. "An agent based model representation to assess resilience and efficiency of food supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, November.
    10. Egamberdiev, Bekhzod, 2024. "Social capital effects on resilience to food insecurity: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 435-450.
    11. Manyanga, Mark & Murendo, Conrad & Pedzisa, Tarisayi & Mutyasira, Vine & Ndou, Richard, . "Resilience capacities and implications for food security in Zimbabwe," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(4).
    12. Hare Krisna Kundo & Martin Brueckner & Rochelle Spencer & John Davis, 2021. "Mainstreaming climate adaptation into social protection: The issues yet to be addressed," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 953-974, August.
    13. Cariola, Lucía & De la Peña García, Antonio & Hilgert, Norma I., 2020. "Adaptive farm management in the context of the expansion of industrial tree plantations in northern Argentina," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Thomas Slijper & Yann de Mey & P Marijn Poortvliet & Miranda P M Meuwissen, 2022. "Quantifying the resilience of European farms using FADN," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 121-150.
    15. Chishimba, Elizabeth Mubanga & Wilson, Paul N., . "Resilience to shocks in Malawian households," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 16(2).
    16. Meuwissen, Miranda P. M. & Feindt, Peter H. & Spiegel, Alisa & Paas, Wim & Soriano, Bárbara & Mathijs, Erik & Balmann, Alfons & Urquhart, Julie & Kopainsky, Birgit & Garrido, Alberto & Reidsma, Pytrik, 2022. "SURE-Farm approach to assess the resilience of European farming systems," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-17.
    17. Poliana Araújo Palmeira & Ruben Araujo de Mattos & Rosana Salles-Costa, 2020. "Food security governance promoted by national government at the local level: a case study in Brazil," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(3), pages 591-606, June.
    18. Michał Borychowski & Sebastian Stępień & Anna Matuszczak & Agnieszka Sapa & Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Adam Majchrzak, 2026. "Are farms in short food supply chains more resilient to external shocks? The assessment of Polish farmers’ perception," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Decker, Emily & Flueckiger, Rebecca M. & Frumkin, Micah & Jeudin, Rebecca H. & Celestin, Christelle & Osman Essa, Abdul Kareem & Yilmaz, Ezgi E., 2025. "Camel leasing as a resilience-building practice: Insights from Somali pastoralist households and dairy farms," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    20. Norman Siebrecht, 2020. "Sustainable Agriculture and Its Implementation Gap—Overcoming Obstacles to Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-27, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8062-:d:1744277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.