Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis of Adhesives in Block-Glued Laminated Timber

The growing need for sustainable and resource-efficient materials increasingly promotes the use of block-glued laminated timber (glulam) in buildings and civil structures such as bridges. While timber is renewable and sustainable, the formaldehyde-based adhesives commonly used in glulam raise environmental and health concerns. This study addresses this gap by presenting one of the first combined life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC) analyses of bio-based versus synthetic adhesives for block-glued glulam. A pedestrian bridge in Zwolle, the Netherlands, serves as a case study. Three synthetic adhesives—melamine-urea formaldehyde (MUF), phenol resorcinol formaldehyde (PRF), and phenol formaldehyde (PF)—and two bio-based alternatives—lignin phenol glyoxal (LPG) and tannin-furfuryl alcohol formaldehyde (TFF)—are analyzed. The LCA covers raw material sourcing, transport, and end-of-life scenarios, with impacts assessed in accordance with EN 15804+A2 using Earthster and the Ecoinvent v3.11 database. The proposed method integrates environmental and economic assessments, with results presented both per kilogram of adhesive and per cubic meter of glulam to ensure comparability. Results show that synthetic adhesives have higher environmental impacts than bio-based adhesives: the carbon footprint of 1 kg of adhesive averages 0.60 kg CO 2 -eq for bio-based adhesives and 2.01 kg CO 2 -eq for synthetic adhesives. LCC are similar across adhesives, averaging EUR 400 per m 3 of glulam. These findings suggest that bio-based adhesives can compete environmentally and economically, but their limited availability and uncertain long-term performance remain barriers. Overall, the study highlights trade-offs between sustainability and structural reliability and provides guidance for sustainable adhesive selection in timber engineering.