IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7976-d1742098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probability-Based Framework for Applying the Ecological Area Ratio: Insights from South Korea’s New Towns

Author

Listed:
  • Juyeon Jang

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Plant Engineering, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Nakyung Lee

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Plant Engineering, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sanha Kim

    (Department of Civil, Environmental and Plant Engineering, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

  • Yeeun Shin

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyeseon Eom

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

  • Kyungjin An

    (Department of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

  • Daeryong Park

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

As urbanization intensifies, the ecological area ratio (EAR) has become an essential tool for assessing ecological performance in urban development projects. However, conventional EAR systems remain largely prescriptive and surface-oriented, lacking adaptability to diverse planning contexts. This study proposes a probability-based EAR reference table developed from empirical data collected across six representative large-scale urban development districts. EAR values were statistically analyzed for 16 land-use types to construct a reference table using mean and quartile indicators. The table was then applied to seven newly planned towns to evaluate its predictive utility. The results showed that predicted EAR values closely aligned with institutional targets and revealed meaningful internal variation depending on land-use composition. Green space and parks showed the highest ecological contributions, while multi-family housing, despite moderate unit-area performance, played a key stabilizing role due to its large spatial footprint. Correlation analyses further demonstrated that EAR composition varied across housing supply types, shaped by differing regulatory frameworks and design priorities. By transitioning EAR from a uniform ratio to a data-driven, probabilistic guideline, this study offers both a practical estimation tool and a strategic planning aid. The findings provide actionable insights for more adaptive, equitable, and ecologically robust urban development practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Juyeon Jang & Nakyung Lee & Sanha Kim & Yeeun Shin & Hyeseon Eom & Kyungjin An & Daeryong Park, 2025. "Probability-Based Framework for Applying the Ecological Area Ratio: Insights from South Korea’s New Towns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7976-:d:1742098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7976/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7976/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan Li & Hongwu Du & Ceren Sezer, 2022. "Sky Gardens, Public Spaces and Urban Sustainability in Dense Cities: Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Soo-Young Moon & Daehee Jang & Hyeon Soo Kim & Ji-Young Lee & Jonghoon Kim, 2020. "Importance of Government Roles for Market Expansion of Eco-Village Development Plan Establishment Research: Case Study in the City of Suwon, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Patricia Romero-Lankao & Daniel M. Gnatz & Olga Wilhelmi & Mary Hayden, 2016. "Urban Sustainability and Resilience: From Theory to Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Melissa Keeley, 2011. "The Green Area Ratio: an urban site sustainability metric," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 937-958, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yangang Xing & Phil Jones & Iain Donnison, 2017. "Characterisation of Nature-Based Solutions for the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Lu Liu & Yun Luo & Jingjing Pei & Huiquan Wang & Jixia Li & Ying Li, 2021. "Temporal and Spatial Differentiation in Urban Resilience and Its Influencing Factors in Henan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Laijun Zhao & Huiyong Li & Yan Sun & Rongbing Huang & Qingmi Hu & Jiajia Wang & Fei Gao, 2017. "Planning Emergency Shelters for Urban Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Location-Allocation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    4. V. M. Jayasooriya & A. W. M. Ng & S. Muthukumaran & B. J. C. Perera, 2016. "Optimal Sizing of Green Infrastructure Treatment Trains for Stormwater Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(14), pages 5407-5420, November.
    5. Jackie Parker & Greg D. Simpson, 2020. "A Theoretical Framework for Bolstering Human-Nature Connections and Urban Resilience via Green Infrastructure," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Amy Hillier & Bing Han & Theodore S. Eisenman & Kelly R. Evenson & Thomas L. McKenzie & Deborah A. Cohen, 2016. "Using Systematic Observations to Understand Conditions that Promote Interracial Experiences in Neighbourhood Parks," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 51-64.
    7. Alexandra Lenis Escobar & Ramón Rueda López & Jorge E. García Guerrero & Enrique Salinas Cuadrado, 2020. "Design of Strategies for the Implementation and Management of a Complementary Monetary System Using the SWOT-AHP Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Surjono Surjono & Pandu Zanuar & Allifia Rizqi, 2022. "Cross-border strategies to respond the impact of climate change in the upstream Brantas Watershed, Indonesia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14393-14420, December.
    9. Emanuel George Mesteru, 2025. "Sustainability in the Management of the Private Medical Sector in Romania: A European, USA and Japan Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-27, June.
    10. Liang Wang & Xiaolong Xue & Yuanxin Zhang & Xiaowei Luo, 2018. "Exploring the Emerging Evolution Trends of Urban Resilience Research by Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, October.
    11. Diana Mancilla-Ruiz & Francisco de la Barrera & Sergio González & Ana Huaico, 2021. "The Effects of a Megafire on Ecosystem Services and the Pace of Landscape Recovery," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Paul Jones, 2017. "Formalizing the Informal: Understanding the Position of Informal Settlements and Slums in Sustainable Urbanization Policies and Strategies in Bandung, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-27, August.
    13. Amy Hillier & Bing Han & Theodore S. Eisenman & Kelly R. Evenson & Thomas L. McKenzie & Deborah A. Cohen, 2016. "Using Systematic Observations to Understand Conditions that Promote Interracial Experiences in Neighbourhood Parks," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 51-64.
    14. R. Patrick Bixler & Katherine Lieberknecht & Fernanda Leite & Juliana Felkner & Michael Oden & Steven M. Richter & Samer Atshan & Alvaro Zilveti & Rachel Thomas, 2019. "An Observatory Framework for Metropolitan Change: Understanding Urban Social–Ecological–Technical Systems in Texas and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Marco Criado & Antonio Martínez-Graña & Fernando Santos-Francés & Sergio Veleda & Caridad Zazo, 2017. "Multi-Criteria Analyses of Urban Planning for City Expansion: A Case Study of Zamora, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Outi Tahvonen, 2018. "Scalable Green Infrastructure—The Case of Domestic Private Gardens in Vuores, Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Barbara Ribeiro & James A. Turner, 2021. "Sustainability Buckets: A Flexible Heuristic for Facilitating Strategic Investment on Place-Dependent Sustainability Narratives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Magdalena Gyurkovich & Joanna Kołata & Marta Pieczara & Piotr Zierke, 2024. "Assessment of the Greenery Content in Suburban Multi-Family Housing Models in Poland: A Case Study of the Poznań Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-31, April.
    19. Peng, Panyu & Li, Mingyang & Ao, Yibin & Deng, Shulin & Martek, Igor, 2024. "Spatial-temporal evolution of driving mechanisms of city resilience: A Sichuan-based case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    20. Alexandru Bănică & Marinela Istrate & Ionel Muntele, 2017. "Challenges for the Resilience Capacity of Romanian Shrinking Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7976-:d:1742098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.