IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7956-d1741652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveiling the Nexus Between Farmer Households’ Subjective Flood Risk Cognition and Disaster Preparedness in Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Liu

    (School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Zhibo Zhang

    (School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Zhe Song

    (School of Public Administration, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China)

  • Jia Shi

    (School of Public Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

Understanding Farmer households’ subjective flood risk cognition is important for effectively mitigating the impacts of flood, and adequate disaster preparedness reduces the impact of floods on the sustainability of farmers’ livelihoods. The existing literature focuses on objective flood risk assessment and subjective–objective risk consistency and less systematically explores the correlation between Farmer households’ subjective flood risk cognition and disaster preparedness. Therefore, this study aims to explores the correlation between Farmer households’ subjective flood risk cognition and disaster preparedness. This study employed a random sampling method to conduct a survey among 540 households in Gaoxian County, Jiajiang County, and Yuechi County, which are flood-prone areas in Southwest China. Based on the survey results, this research framework can be used to evaluate systems of subjective flood risk cognition and farmers’ disaster preparedness. We chose the Tobit Regression Model to empirically explore the correlation between subjective flood risk cognition and farmers’ disaster preparedness. The results showed that among the 540 surveyed farmers, their overall subjective flood risk cognition was at a medium-high level (3.58), with self-efficacy more than response efficacy, more than threat, and more than probability. Further, the overall disaster preparedness of farmers was at a medium level (0.5), with physical disaster preparedness more than emergency disaster preparedness and more than knowledge and skills preparedness. The regression analysis showed that the probability of flooding and the threat in Farmer households’ subjective flood risk cognition were positively related to disaster preparedness, whereas self-efficacy, response efficacy, and overall risk cognition in Farmer households’ subjective flood risk cognition were negatively related to disaster preparedness. This study is representative of or may serve as a reference for building governance systems and disaster prevention in other flood risk areas in Southwest China.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Liu & Zhibo Zhang & Zhe Song & Jia Shi, 2025. "Unveiling the Nexus Between Farmer Households’ Subjective Flood Risk Cognition and Disaster Preparedness in Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7956-:d:1741652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7956-:d:1741652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.